User talk:TeeVeeed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Housewifehader)
Jump to: navigation, search

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse[edit]

WP teahouse logo 3.png
Hello, TeeVeeed. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived. Message added by Lunashy (Lunashy (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Re:Logo reducing[edit]

You don't need to do anything. A bot will come along and resize the logo and remove the reduce tag when it's done. We hope (talk) 02:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

OH! Thank-you. Also, I would prefer to use the other license (promotional) if possible because that was more in-line with the permission that was granted when I downloaded the graphic. Is there a way to change that or should I wait 'till the bot comes-along? HousewifeHater 02:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Let me go back and take care of that also. BTW--the only time to worry that something's going to disappear is when a notice says something about the image being deleted or being deleted in X number of days unless you take care of (fill in the blank). ;-)We hope (talk) 02:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
A done deal! :-) We hope (talk) 02:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Muuy Thank-You! Yeah that is exactly what I was worried about because I thought that I saw something that said that the clock was ticking-something about "48 hours"...maybe that has something to do with the bot that re-sizes?? Also-I want to make sure that I use the graphic/and license correctly because I would like to start cleaning-up some of the other Real Housewives pages HousewifeHater 02:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

These Wikipedia:Template messages/Deletion are the ones that say something serious is up. The bot usually does the resizing within those 48 hours. ;-) We hope (talk) 03:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

TY♥ HousewifeHater 03:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, TeeVeeed. You have new messages at Nthep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

August 2012[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion, while blocked as an IP. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TeeVeeed (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

bully and abuse by admin(s)HousewifeHater 22:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC

Decline reason:

No valid reason given to unblock. I see no evidence of admin abuse.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC))

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:The Real Housewives of New Jersey.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Real Housewives of New Jersey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Senator2029 ‖ Talk 19:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atlantic City, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imitation of Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, TeeVeeed. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 03:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 03:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at The Great Gatsby (2013 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I think that I will take it to IRC thank-youTeeVeeed (talk) 04:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Good idea. I definitely agree with you that it's an Australian film. I'm not even sure how it's even an American film; it's only tie is that the distributor is American. But I'm not sure how much that really matters. It's clear the other editor is having no interest in discussing the matter.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

TY-I didn't even start it, trying to follow procedure but instead getting pulled into warring. Plus I resent the additional clarifications and cites that I added being "poofed"-like that.TeeVeeed (talk) 04:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The other editor finally responded on the talk page that the film was distributed by Warner Bro. But there is also a link to "Baz"-"Boz"? (a producer?) in a secondary source titled, "Baz/Boz says GG is "Australian". If there is some policy involved with countries and movies, that would be different, but the financial assistance provided, (and probably the controversy surrounding that)-should probably be included.TeeVeeed (talk) 04
42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

DRN Restructure[edit]

There seems to be a problem with the DRN page this morning.[1]]

I was not able to get to our page to post my comment because the links to open disputes are all broken. I am going to be unavailable for most of the day so I'm leaving my comment here which you can post if you wish, or, I will try again at the end of the day when I'm back home.

Thank you for your help.

If comments could stay focused on the text only I think we could make useful progress. It's very hard to look at text and comment when simultaneously your character is being attacked. I still think we need a neutral third party arbitrator in cases where consensus can't be reached.

LoreMariano (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm trying to fix something with how the dispute is listed.

I'm sorry if you feel attacked with anything that has been said there so far, but I assure you that any comments that I made about trying to solve the problem by following the usual policy of Wikipedia was not aimed at you or any other editors personally. I think that someone such as myself who looked at the article for the first time, not knowing anything at all about the topic, is a pretty good representative of a user of Wikipedia.TeeVeeed (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

all edits missing on July 25[edit]

So all of my edits except today's are not showing-weirdHousewifehader (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Youngkitten.JPG

H,

Housewifehader (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Diner (film)[edit]

I'm just wondering about the source of this edit. Thanks. Oh, and I think it's too long and somebody will remove it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Message[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Message[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Tildes[edit]

Hi, I notice that you are leaving edit summaries with four tildes in them ~~~~, probably due to the message SineBot left on your account when you first started. I wanted to let you know that leaving these in edit summaries is ineffectual and just clutters the field. Tildes are required when discussing on talk pages, it is how you sign your posts by leaving them at the end of a line, as wikicode inside the box. The Wiki substs them automatically into a signature. This process does not happen in edit summaries, which are intended to be concise digests of what you did. Individual edits are always "signed" with your name in the database, so we can always tell who did them and there is no need to sign. I hope that clears it up for you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

WHAT? I had no idea! Ty for letting me know about that. It might take awhile to get out of that habit.So-don't sign when editing articles? Wow.Housewifehader (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. It looks like you're on the right track. Elizium23 (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Alternate accounts[edit]

I note that you are editing under both User:Housewifehader and User:TeeVeeed. The policy on that is at WP:SOCK#LEGIT and I do not see that you are using alternate accounts for an illegitimate purpose. But, with a previous block for block evasion, I would very strongly recommend that you disclose your alternate accounts on your TeeVeeed user page (not here on your talk page) using one of the user boxes listed here and be very, very careful not to use them for any purpose which might even remotely be thought by someone to be illegitimate. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:01, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank-you for the advice. I will attempt to try that but I am having a lot of trouble staying with one account! All of my contributions keep vanishing, (so it looks like i have been here less-than four days!), and the system keeps logging me out. I am really thinking about trying a CLEANSTART, just to get a new account at this point, no SP intended, and i have never SP'd or tried to intentionally pretend that i am not one person here. That SP investigation that was alleged actually was between myself and another(S?) editor, because I agreed with his edits so I was accused of being one of his/their socks. It wasn't even about me being a sock really.OH-and my agreement to not be banned from the SP bs, was that I would log-in with a user name, and really I had better luck staying with the same identity when I was IP-editing. Now I have to look for my IP, my old name, and my new name, and 90% of the contributions that I make while logged-in are not showing-up when I want to check on my older edits with those screen-names. That's why I'm thinking that it might be worth a try to start another account and drop this one?Housewifehader (talk) 05:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Housewifehader (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The new face of DRN: TeeVeeed[edit]

Peacedove.svg

Recently the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard underwent some changes in how it operates. Part of the change involved a new list of volunteers with a bit of information about the people behind the names.

You are listed as a volunteer at DRN currently, to update your profile is simple, just click here. Thanks, Cabe6403(TalkSign) 17:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your involvement with DRN[edit]

Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

OOps sorry I just received this message. Thank-you for letting me know about inactive status. I'll see if there is still a backlog.24.0.133.234 (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)-oops again, that was me not logged-nHousewifehader (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessie Wiseman concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessie Wiseman, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessie Wiseman[edit]

Hello TeeVeeed. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jessie Wiseman".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessie Wiseman}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)