User talk:INeverCry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Women writers[edit]

Hi again, INeverCry. I am sorry to see you leave WP:WMNWRITE because the project scope is larger than you expected. You are an important early supporter of the project and your comments have been very helpful. I'm hopeful that you decide to return at some point. Know that you can work on as much or as little of the scope, i.e. biographies only, as suits you. I wish you the best, --Rosiestep (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the confusion INeverCry. We should've updated the project page right away to reflect the changed scope. I agree that including works does make for a rather massive WikiProject, but I think there is some sense in including them too. I for one wouldn't object to revisiting the scope of the project. Either way, we'd be much better off with you as a member, especially given your extensive and excellent navbox contributions. gobonobo + c 05:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
I think I'll rejoin the project, but the size of it may be daunting to possible new members. Assessment becomes a big issue too. I've done 20000+ assessments here, and it can be pretty time consuming. Thanks for your kind message though, and thanks also to Rosiestep. My apologies for over-reacting. INeverCry 19:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Very happy to have you back! --Rosiestep (talk) 04:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

why are you undoing the notices on the talk pages?[edit]

Why are you undoing the notices on the Talk pages from the Women writers group? No reason given. When I see it, I revert, as this group has rated the article, and the author is a woman. Please explain all your reverting, or stop it. I am not in that project, but I see you actions as not positive, to say the least. --Prairieplant (talk) 19:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This has been fixed and I think it was just a simple misunderstanding over the scope of the project. gobonobo + c 05:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)