User talk:I am One of Many

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (December 2012 – May 2013)
Archive 2 (June 2013 – August 2013)
Archive 3 (September 2013 – December 2013)
Archive 4 (January 2014 – April 2014)
Archive 5 (May 2014 – July 2014)
Archive 6 (August 2014 – )

[edit]

Hi, I noticed were in favor of keeping the article on learningrx. I even added skepticism wiki-template on the talk page. However I'm seeking your help in adding their logo to the article for informative purposes, but not sure how it works. The link to the logo is here [1]

Can you help? Thanks.--Taeyebaar (talk) 20:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Sure, first add an infobox company and then download the log and use the "upload file" feature to the left. Select the file to upload and "fair use" option. Then answer all the question and check the type of image as logo. Once you are successful, you put the file name into the image section of the info box. If you have trouble, let me know and I can do it for you tonight. --I am One of Many (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

quick note re DS alert[edit]

Hi IaOoM. Roxy provided you with a DS alert in this dif. It is true that he made a mistake and referred to comments you made on Cla68's Talk page, when what Roxy meant were comments you made at Talk:Intelligent design, discussing Cla68's comments.

I just wanted to be sure you know that the placing of the alert was relevant; you have edited that article and commented on its Talk page, and the article does fall under the Arbcom pseudoscience decision. You've been alerted and it will be logged. The alert is a courtesy; that's all. Jytdog (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I apologise for getting mixed up. My observations were made entirely on the ID page, and not on CLA68's Talk page, and the DS warning that you have deleted was entirely properly placed on your Talk page. You are of course at liberty to remove them, but removal constitutes acknowledgement that you have seen them. Thanks. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 17:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Both of you should stop using these templates to intimidate people. It seems to me that both of you ought to receive the same template regarding pseudoscience. However, since I would consider that kind of behavior on my part as unconstructive and disruptive and so I wouldn't engage in it. --I am One of Many (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
This bit of misunderstanding is unfortunate. The discretionary sanctions alert is just that an alert and not a warning. To issue the alert on a users talk should not be construed as a warning and Roxy was in error in using that language. Anyone who edits in an area subject to arbcom sanctions needs to be aware of the sanctions and the need to use caution in those areas. Receiving such an alert does not imply wrongdoing on your part - and I would hope that you will continue to make good edits in the area as you have in the past. Vsmith (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Vsmith for clarifying. So, even though mistakenly I received a warning [2] I can rest assured that I won't be sanctioned without a genuine warning first? --I am One of Many (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see WP:AC/DS. As long as your edits are in line with Wikipedia policies and talk page guidelines (civil and non-disruptive) there should be no problem. Any admin should certainly notify an editor and discuss perceived problems prior to applying sanctions. Just continue with good edits, avoid edit warring and incivil comments. Vsmith (talk) 23:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Those are principles I always do my best to follow. --I am One of Many (talk) 00:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 12 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

RfC on foie gras[edit]

Hi. Thanks very much for your contributions to the RfC at Foie gras. Your input is very much appreciated. You appear to have made an edit which splits a message of mine from a collapsible box. I am sure you did this inadvertently - it's all getting a bit confused on there! Would you mind if I sorted it out by moving your edit? Feel free to do this yourself if you wish - I am just trying to save you time.__DrChrissy (talk) 21:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do sort it out! --I am One of Many (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Cheers!__DrChrissy (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)