|
Contents
- 1 Query
- 2 {{URLENCODE:{{PAGENAME}}}}
- 3 states vs "länder"
- 4 mission statement
- 5 Please see my comments on the Asian Pride page before reverting citations.
- 6 Vandal?
- 7 Spiritualistic template
- 8 Spiritualistic practises
- 9 3RR
- 10 Umbanda
- 11 Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
- 12 Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
- 13 Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
- 14 Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
- 15 Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
- 16 Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
- 17 Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
- 18 Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
- 19 Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
- 20 Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
- 21 Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
- 22 Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
- 23 Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
- 24 Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
- 25 Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
- 26 Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
- 27 Image:CaliTricolor.svg listed for deletion
- 28 Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
- 29 Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
- 30 Removed from Signpost spamlist
- 31 MfD nomination of User:UBX/LGBTinterest not
- 32 MfD nomination of User:UBX/Not all members
- 33 File:Not my flag.png listed for deletion
- 34 File:POSTNET 0.png listed for deletion
- 35 File:POSTNET 1.png listed for deletion
- 36 File:POSTNET 2.png listed for deletion
- 37 File:POSTNET 3.png listed for deletion
- 38 File:POSTNET 4.png listed for deletion
- 39 File:POSTNET 5.png listed for deletion
- 40 File:POSTNET 6.png listed for deletion
- 41 File:POSTNET 7.png listed for deletion
- 42 File:POSTNET 8.png listed for deletion
- 43 File:POSTNET 9.png listed for deletion
|
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For turning
this MfD into a less hostile environment by politely explaining the situation to a SPA. ˉˉ
anetode╦╩ 21:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
[1]
This editor is a
Journeyman Editor, and is entitled to display this
Service Badge.
Based on your comments on the CFD on "admins open to recall", I'd like to have your opinion on an alternative idea with somewhat stricter norms. >Radiant< 00:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] {{URLENCODE:{{PAGENAME}}}}
Hi!
{{SERVER}}/wiki/user:{{URLENCODE:{{PAGENAME}}}} is '''not''' {{SERVER}}/wiki/user:{{PAGENAMEE}}<br />
{{SERVER}}/wiki/user:{{URLENCODE:I}}%20{{URLENCODE:do}}%20{{URLENCODE:not}}%20{{URLENCODE:exist}} '''will''' be the same<br />
generates:
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:I+do+not+exist is not //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:I_do_not_exist
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:I%20do%20not%20exist will be the same
Best regards
·לערי ריינהארט·T·m:Th·T·email me· 07:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- I know, but that's not a problem since //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User+talk%3AI+do+not+exist works just fine. - ∅ (∅), 07:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
testing
{{SERVER}}/w/index.php?title=user:{{URLENCODE:I do not exist}}<br />
generating
//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=user:I+do+not+exist
works fine also. Regards
·לערי ריינהארט·T·m:Th·T·email me· 08:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] states vs "länder"
I stand corrected. You are correct that Wikipedia refers to the Länder of German as "states". As someone who lives between both cultures, I prefer to make distinctions about things such as this particular issue. I also disagree with translating Gymnasium and Abitur as High School, and High School Diploma. They're fundamentally different concepts and mean quite different things. However, in the case of "länder" vs "states" the difference is very minor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puellanivis (talk • contribs) 10:51, January 2, 2008
[edit] mission statement
"My mission on Wikipedia is to make this encyclopedia not look like it was written by a bunch of random people on the Internet." - this the nature of wikipedia and this is how wikipedia grows. it's like you're cleaning up a construction site because you dont want it to look so messy -- but in the process you impose your own prudishness and interfere with progress.
This link might better re-state the above: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Perfection_is_not_required http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Preserve_information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.197.135.188 (talk) 02:17, January 6, 2008
I think this subject is pretty narrow, so info is fairly limited. When there are no non-commercial websites that have the info that needs to be cited, shouldn't we cite whatever is available (if it seems to be legit).
So far, nobody has disputed the Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Mandarin Romanization, Cantonese Romanization, Korean Hangul and Korean Hanja translations. The disputed ones (As I have watched this page for a while) were from other sources, or original content from whomever edited the page (speaking of the Japanese Romaji, Japanese Katakana and Vietnamese disasters that were added).
I think the page is poorly-written and much of the content is incoherent. It seems that is what should really be tackled before refining the translation citations.
Please at least replace the current citations/links to http://www.orientaloutpost.com/asian_pride.php to some website or other source that seems more appropriate.
I might be biased to that website because they helped me avoid a terrible Asian symbol tattoo mistake that I was about to make, with no charge. But I also looked elsewhere and nothing else seemed as legit.
75.33.205.84 (talk) 06:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vandal?
I stand most offended by your shameful statements on my intentions with the editing on wikipedia. I can assure that what you are saying is wrong, I am a man of seriousness and good reputation. I do not wish for you to throw acquisitions on me without the slightest evidence (nor reason), such a behaviour is undemoratic and not in accordance with good western civilized spirit. HowardHughesExpert (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- This person seems to find all things from new and/or anons to be vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.146.148.84 (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Spiritualistic template
Hi.
I noticed you altered and removed a template I placed on a couple of articles.
On what references would you base your consider that there was no connection between the various spiritualistic traditions?
Thank you. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 22:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I was quite surprised to see the spirit(ual)ism template, it struck me as if someone had added {{Lower Saxon Circle}} to Switzerland. I'd be interested to know your reasoning behind the connection and what reliable sources you can produce to back it up. Thanks. :-) - ∅ (∅), 02:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- I agree with removing the spiritualism and spiritism category form the bottom but have replaced an updated infobox at the top. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Spiritualistic practises
If you note, it has been changed to spiritualistic practises which is quite accurate.
If you want the references and citations for such uses, check my edits.
If you have the references and citations which contradict that such practises are spiritualistic, please provide them.
I think you are confusing Spiritualism, the religious movement of the 1840s to 1920s, with spiritualism and spiritualistic which have quite different meanings in academia these days.
Again, it is all there in the citations. Thanks. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- If your template is to go on every spirituality-related page, it's way too inclusive and should be deleted. I've added a note to this effect on the TfD page. - ∅ (∅), 13:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
OK. I tried to be polite ...
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Spiritualism_small. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please pay attention to the detail. I agree, it should not go on every Spirituality page. It should only go on spiritualistic topics, which is what I have paid attention to. You do not appear to realize the considerable difference and are offering no citation to counter --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- WP:DTTR. If there's a burden of proof, it's on you. - ∅ (∅), 16:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Umbanda
Look, if you take an example like Umbanda on the top line it has;
"Umbanda is a religion that blends Catholicism, Kardecist Spiritualism, and Afro-Brazilian religions."
So please tell me how it has no relationship with the infobox and why it should be removed?
What is your understanding of animism?
Thank you. --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 12:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- A religion or religious practice that merely incorporates beliefs or practices from Spiritism is not itself Spiritism. It does have a relationship with the "infobox", but only a secondary one. - ∅ (∅), 13:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- I am afraid that it hardly and answer and without any references or citations, it is just POV. I have gone to great length to provide citations in my edits. A simple google will back me up. So what point are you really trying to make?
-
- The infobox is not promoting spiritism nor stating so, it connects spiritualistic topics that are obviously connected. It is the purpose of the wiki to inform and broaden people's knowledge.
-
-
[edit] Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:CaliTricolor.svg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CaliTricolor.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stlemur (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Removed from Signpost spamlist
Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least a few months. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the Signpost on your talk page, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ral315 (talk) 07:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
User:UBX/LGBTinterest not, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/LGBTinterest not and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/LGBTinterest not during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 23:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
User:UBX/Not all members, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Not all members and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/Not all members during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 23:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] File:Not my flag.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Not my flag.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 23:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 0.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 0.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 1.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 2.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 3.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 3.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 4.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 4.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 5.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 5.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 6.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 6.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 7.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 7.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 8.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 8.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File:POSTNET 9.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POSTNET 9.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 11:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Spiritualism_small. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please pay attention to the detail. I agree, it should not go on every Spirituality page. It should only go on spiritualistic topics, which is what I have paid attention to. You do not appear to realize the considerable difference and are offering no citation to counter --Lucyintheskywithdada (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
