User talk:Ianmacm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hi -- given your interest in Epstein, I wonder if you'd be willing to have a look at the talk page for Alan Dershowitz, [1]. There's a push to get the underage sex thing onto his article as well. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I've never been involved at Alan Dershowitz. There is a problem with civil lawsuits, where a person can claim anything and it is not necessarily going to be found to be true by a court.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:34, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Can't find E Mails under Tools![edit]

Wiki is very confusing. I've tried to send the sleeves to you and cannot do it. Tried to email you but have no idea how. I see this on the kingofhits site about Bob Woffinden. I was going to change the incorrect entry but is this a reliable link to put in? Gary Bern (talk) 06:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

This is similar to things that have occurred in the past at Jonathan King. The problem is not Wikipedia getting it wrong or deliberately excluding things, but other editors having difficulty finding sources for the material that meet WP:V. The Bay City Rollers singles are rather specialised and online sources are not always ideal. The article says that King produced "Keep on Dancing", although it doesn't go into detail about other singles. Discogs is OK as a source and says that King produced "We Can Make Music"[2] There is a problem with WP:PRIMARY with scans of record sleeves, but the Bell records labels of "Keep On Dancing" (BLL 1164) and "We Can Make Music" (Bell 1220) are both on Discogs.[3] According to Discogs, these are the only Bay City Rollers records produced by King. "Email this user" should be at the left hand side of the page under "Tools", but the page it links to is here and gives a form to fill in. However, it wouldn't be possible to add an attachment such as an image.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Max Clifford image[edit]

Hi: I just thought I'd copy you this diff containing Stemoc's justification for reverting your edit to the Max Clifford article. -- The Anome (talk) 12:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I've reverted this with a request to discuss it on the talk page.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 12:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


That article is dire. Would you care to explain why it shouldn't be tagged for cleanup? (talk) 13:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

IF you add a sensible tag and reasons on the talk page. One of the tags was offensive and lucky not to get you blocked.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm going to re-add the tag (the article is definitely in need of a clean-up). I'll quote a few excerpts on the talk page, they really do speak for themselves. A brain-damaged monkey could write better. (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Actually I doubt that.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)


Im watching you — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

And now we're all watching you. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Am I supposed to feel bad/good about this? Such a mystery. Not a mystery though, is the WHOIS. I await further reports with bated breath. My own personal stalker, how big an honour can you get on Wikipedia?--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)