User talk:Imeriki al-Shimoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Books of Chronicles, etc.[edit]

Just a head's-up: I've created threads at Talk:Books of Kings and Talk:Books of Samuel, as well as notifying relevant WikiProjects, in order to get discussions rolling. If it garners little interest, I would suggest we just be bold and move them, waiting to see if anyone objects. Evanh2008 (talk) (contribs) 06:53, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I only just accessed my email and got the long message - my apologies, seems to have been superseded by discussion on the page. All the best! In ictu oculi (talk) 12:11, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Ad-Rock[edit]

Regarding this edit, you should be aware that it is Adam Yauch, not Adam Horovitz.-Cntras (talk) 00:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Religion Manual of Style[edit]

Oh, yeah, it is very definitely still in the process of development. I have a couple of sections I myself am still hoping to add/develop, as soon as I figure out how to phrase it all. If you have any specific suggestions as well, please feel free to make them. But, basically, it is my hope, and that of a few other editors, that when we have the MOS in place, a lot of the existing problems we have might be a bit easier to resolve civilly. John Carter (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Karaims[edit]

I have left a reply to your comment here. Thank you for joining the discussion, wider participation is extremely valuable on this narrowly domestic topic. Kaz 08:37, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear Imeriki, Toddy1 has proposed moving a section of discussion [1] which you can see includes some of your comments. I have no objection to this move. If you agree then the Talk:Crimean_Karaites#Dispute_history_and_resolution section (which includes your comments) will be moved to follow on directly after the Talk:Crimean_Karaites#Google_book_search_counts section. Would you allow us to move your comments to the proposed location? Kaz 09:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Era style[edit]

Hello. Because you participated at some point in this lengthy discussion about the wording of MOS guidelines pertaining to the use of BC/AD and BCE/CE, I thought you might want to contribute to the current discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#RfC on era style (BC/AD and BCE/CE). I'm trying to notify all the individuals who took part in the earlier discussion but haven't weighed in yet for the current one. Cynwolfe (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

How do you feel about Genisis created issue in Gen 1:27 how did canna find his wife?[edit]

Old Testement question — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.132.86 (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are asking. Also, is this in relation to a Wikipedia article? — al-Shimoni (talk) 01:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

notification of current state of work title capitalization rules discussion over at WT:MoS[edit]

Hi. As you're one of those folks who contributed to the work title capitalization rules discussion over at WT:MoS but then seemed to tune out (and therefore – as opposed to the "MoS regulars" – probably didn't follow it any further), I just briefly wanted to point you towards my latest post there (beginning with "As there has been little progress"), which might well be the last overall: I'm phasing out, and since there hasn't been much input by other users lately, it's likely that over the next few days, the thread'll die (i.e., disappear into the archives) without there having been made any changes to the MoS. So I'd be much obliged if you took the time to stake your support for or opposition to my proposal (should I also have put an RfC tag there?) and – unless it's accepted (I'm not holding my breath...) – maybe even considered keeping the debate going. Thanks. (I'm aware of the unsolicited nature of this message, so if you feel molested by it, I apologize.) – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 14:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

IP block exemption[edit]

Please note that I have removed your IPBE flag because a review found that it is unnecessary at this time. If you feel that it is needed again in the future, please feel free to request it again. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, I have moved to a new location, so the old exemption would no longer be necessary. — al-Shimoni (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

About your post on Biblical Hebrew[edit]

Hello, al-Shimoni. I came across your post about AHRC on the Talk Page of the Biblical Hebrew. Have I really been fooled, and if so what site would you suggest? I ask this because I seek an intimate relationship with HaShem, and if I am blessing him incorrectly, I need to know. Please contact me on my talk page as soon as you finish reading this.AurumSpiral1235813 (talk) 15:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Illustration - books of Samuel[edit]

Thanks for the message abt Books of Samuel. I've left my own message at Samuelled's talk page. Just one extra point: the image is relevant, because the episode of David and Bathsheba is found in 2nd Samuel - in fact it's extremely important in the overall biblical history, as Solomon, and hence the entire House of David, is supposedly descended through Bathsheba. PiCo (talk) 04:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Revival of interest in the film Infernal Affairs[edit]

Invitation to participate in the poll for Infernal Affairs.

From your edits for the film Infernal Affairs there is presently a poll taking place on The Departed film Talk page regarding whether you believe a separate subsection should be included for (a) Infernal Affairs as a source for the plot of The Departed film, and/or (b) a second subsection for the recently captured crime figure Whitey Bulger as the source for the character played by Jack Nicholson in the film.

The recent capture of Bulger has revived the question from two years ago of Infernal Affairs from when it did have a separate subsection on The Departed film page which was deleted by User:RepublicanJ, now known as User:OldJ. Invite to visit The Departed Talk page, to the Bulger section at the end of the Page, to participate in the Poll currently taking place. 208.120.96.227 (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)