User talk:Indopug

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Reverts on INB[edit]

Hey, For such material, especially given the possibility that it could be a misuse of phone nos / names and not just a case of spamming, please consider reporting to WP:AIV for an immediate block and/or WP:Oversight for suppression of personally identifiable information. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 18:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

What's your problem, respected Indopug?[edit]

Respected Indopug, I just want to tell you that if you want to do a fair analysis of a personality, then you must talk about both his critics and supporters. Why are you trying to delete what Narendra Modi and Taruna Vijaya want to say about Golwalkar? I am not deleting what Ramchandra Guha said about this social activist! If I am comfortable about the criticisms, then why are you deleting the opinions of the followers of Golwalkar? Please don't turn Wikipedia into a battleground. I have referenced to credible sources. If Ramchandra Guha's book is credible, then Taruna Vijaya's book is also credible. If not, do clarify why not. Why should one think Guha is unbiased and Vijaya is biased? Why both sides of the story cannot be presented before public? Please visit the Wikipedia page on RSS, and you will find that Taruna Vijaya has already been accepted in general as a credible scholar to refer to. Another thing. Please read the RSS page in Wikipedia. You will find out that RSS did actively participate for India during the Indo-China and Indo-Pakistan Wars. And you must know that the multicultural and multi-ethnic Indian Army never complained about RSS' role. Then why blame the contemporary RSS chief like that? If some people criticise Golwalkar, that is okay. If some people praise Golwalkar, that must also be okay. Who are I and/or you to decide what is to be written and what is to be omitted? If I don't delete the criticisms by Guha, why do you delete the kind words from Modi? Strange!!! I humbly appeal to your leaned cooperation that please stop deleting the counter-views, when criticisms are being left untouched. I think you will understand my humble entreaty. Thanks in advance. Arghyan Opinions (talk) 15:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Satyajit-Ray.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Satyajit-Ray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Stop shirking and get back to it![edit]

Greetings, I haven't seen you around recently, which is a shame. As a fan of your work, I'd like to see you back at FAC pretty damn sharpish; get back to it, and stop shirking! Cassiantotalk 19:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)