Orphaned non-free image File:Tom99.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tom99.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Category edit to Allium tricoccum
Hi, I'm not sure what you were trying to achieve with your edits at Allium tricoccum. If it was to get "Ramp" listed at Category:Allium, the way to do it is to categorize the redirect, as I've now done. Maybe this isn't what you intended? Peter coxhead (talk) 21:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joan Shawlee, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Willard, Critic's Choice and Lover Come Back (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I see you have reverted my edit on the Ted Bundy article. The reason for my deletion, as part of the serial killers task force, was that there are far two many cat's for this article. I will consult further before making a final decision. I have to say that your edits would carry far more weight if you were a registered user and contributed in a constructive manner. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Could I repectfully ask that if you leave a "contribution" on my Talk page: that you sign your comments, that you check to make sure it makes some sense and is not full of typos. From the comments on this page, it does seem that you have little understanding of how to edit the encyclopedia. Experienced editors are here to help.
On the question of your edit to the Ted Bundy article; I have, as promised, consulted with other members of the community - who look after this page. They all agree that your edit was unnecessary, as there are far too many categories posted there, but we are happy to leave your edit as it stands. Case closed. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 08:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- The possessive of Davis is pronounced "Davises" (i.e., the plural is sounded); thus the 's is included. If the plural were not sounded, then Davis' would be correct; but in fact it is sounded and thus Davis' is patently incorrect.
I wanted to point out that the Manual of Style clearly states that either way is accepted, so it's not true that the use of "Davis'" instead of "Davis's" is "patently incorrect". The former was consistently used throughout the article, so there was no need to change it. Omnedon (talk) 17:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)