User talk:Ironholds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Orphaned non-free image File:KnowledgeGraph.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KnowledgeGraph.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

@Stefan2: Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Ironholds (talk) 23:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-a-Thon[edit]

January 25 - Pollard Memorial Library and UMass Lowell Library Edit-a-Thon #2 - You're invited
Pollard Memorial Library

Yours, --LibraryGurl (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Yay, another one! *cough* @Protonk: *cough*. Ironholds (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

October–December 2014 Milhist reviewing award[edit]

Wiki-stripe1.svg Military history reviewers' award
For completing 1 review during October–December 2014, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Military history reviewers' award. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Trespass in English Law[edit]

Hey there, I undid your undoing of my edit to Trespass in English Law. I came across that page when casually going through it. I am studying English law from the University of London International Academy, and I made the edit in line with what I have and am studying in English Criminal Law and English Tort Law, respectively. I found the earlier version to be factually incorrect. If you think my edit is factually incorrect, feel free to tell me that. I do not wish to engage in an edit war, I never have; I did that with the best of intentions and beliefs. Kind regards Ahmer Jamil KhanWho?Chat? 10:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ahmer Jamil Khan: fair enough. The problem comes with the distinction between common assault and assault; Common assault is an assault, or a battery action, while assault consists exclusively of the apprehension of physical force. So we're both slightly off - if it's okay with you, I'll tweak the article and ask you to review it? Ironholds (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
@Ironholds: Sure, anything that serves the greater good. Assault in English law, in both Tort and Criminal, is defined as apprehension of immediate, unlawful forced by the defendant/claimant.Ahmer Jamil KhanWho?Chat? 14:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Indeed, the problem is the distinction between common assault and assault. My suggestion would be we tweak it to:

Under English criminal and tort law, an assault simply means to act in such a way that the claimant or victim believes they are about to be attacked

Thoughts? Ironholds (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)