User talk:JWSchmidt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Liberation. When we can see the world in more than one way. Duckrabbit

Newer talk is at the bottom of this page.


Older Talk[edit]

User:JWSchmidt/Talk archive - and barnstars

More Talk in 2011[edit]

File:Evolution of photosynthesis.png mistake?[edit]

An editor disputes the diagram you uploaded.[1] DMacks (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:TwoRuBisCOquestions.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TwoRuBisCOquestions.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion[edit]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion[edit]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

WikiProject Animal rights[edit]

You are receiving this semi-automated message because you are a participant of WikiProject Animal rights. If the project is not on your watchlist or you have not visited the WikiProject recently you will not be aware of some of the changes that I have made to the pages, or aware of an a issue that has been raised about my attempt to re-categorise some of the project related articles. Please revisit the project talk page to add your input. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:23, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

hi[edit]

this is eme... aka remi... aka... other stuff... from the project you were banned from. I just saw that you were banned...

how have you been? maybe i'll e-mail you. I think I still have that..... WIKIADVERSITY (talk) 01:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Medicine[edit]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 15:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change[edit]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion[edit]

Proposed deletion of Wikipedia[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. It duplicates information elsewhere without adding anything extra. JMcC (talk) 09:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)[edit]

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox protein - short[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Infobox protein - short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Agonists.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Another one of your uploads, File:Betareg.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Another one of your uploads, File:Beta-catenin.PNG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Another one of your uploads, File:CDdiffractionpattern.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


Bioenergetics and Your Contribution[edit]

Dear JW Schmidt, 1. I'm inspired to improve the Bioenergetics page and pray that I don't offend anyone by replacing their words with mine. Yours was the only name there on the talk page, so I supposed you may have been the original author of the article. I am not a qualified professional or expert so someone like yourself might visit the page (in a few weeks) to mitigate errors.

2. While searching for a way to contact you, experiencing talk pages et cetera for the first time, I learned that you have contributed much time and energy to the Wikipedia project. Thank you!!! But it seems you haven't been active for years. My main interest is cognition at the cellular level, especially microbes, at the molecular level. So of course your effort to develop the Molecular and Cellular Biology Portal was wonderful, and I hope you're able to do more good work.

Sincerely, Jakelove (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

p.s.

(19 March 2014) Over these past few days, I've realized that several other of my writing projects have priority over this so, as much as I'd like to see a new Bioenergetics page, I won't be contributing anytime soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakelove (talkcontribs) 21:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Acetogens references[edit]

Hi, I included a new reference in the acetogens lemma but for some reason the reference shows a link but no name. I do not understand how I should fix this. Can you do it or explain it to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uisgebeata (talkcontribs) 16:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)