User talk:J Milburn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive

Archives edit header

Archive 38
Archive 39
Archive 40
Archive 41

READ THIS:

Please create new sections at the bottom of the page. Do not assume I know which article, image or page you are talking about, please provide a link so I do know, even it has been deleted. Also, please sign your messages, so I know who you are. I will reply on your talk page, unless you tell me otherwise.

I will probably remove bot and template messages after reading them, but they are still appreciated. Most other messages will be archived. Remember that a lot of people could read this- for confidential communication, email me, though for the vast majority of messages, here is the appropriate place. Thanks!

The Signpost: 23 July 2014[edit]

Your GA nomination of The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Harrowing (Inside No. 9) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Request[edit]

Hi J, I'm afraid your help on "His Last Vow" was so good I've come to ask you something else... Please can you give Ernest Radcliffe Bond a thorough going over/tell me issues as if it was a peer review, as I would really like to get him to FA sometime. I would be happy to review Inside No. 9 if you wanted in return (bearing in mind I am currently doing a GA review for a Cup contestant)? Thanks, Matty.007 16:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Matty.007- I'll certainly take a look, but it's not a subject I know anything about. Small world, though, as I'm currently visiting my parents, so I'm actually staying only a few miles from Barrow, where Bond was born. J Milburn (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Do you want me to review Inside No. 9 at some point? Thanks, Matty.007 16:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I certainly wouldn't object- it's been in the queue a long time! J Milburn (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid it may be a few weeks, but if it's still there I'll definitely take a look (taking a holiday from 15 August till end of month so want to get points for things before then). Thanks, Matty.007 18:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Primary Colours (Eddy Current Suppression Ring album)[edit]

I have addressed most of the concerns left from your GA review. It seems I can never remember how hard it is to pass a GA nomination! If you could have another look and tell me if you still think anything needs to be changed, that would be great. Jinkinson talk to me 00:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments on my talk, most of which I have now addressed as well--I uploaded a better cover image, expanded the reception section, and added the missing person under "personnel" I had a hard time finding interviews, though. Do you think it's ready for another GA nomination now? Jinkinson talk to me 19:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay. I'm taking a look now, and will hopefully get back to you later. J Milburn (talk) 18:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Jinkinson: I still don't think it'd sail through GAC, but it's much better. Here are a few more things you may want to change:

  • Original release date in the lead?
  • So it was released only in those three countries? That's what "finally" implies.
  • Two paragraphs of lead would probably be best.
  • Don't be scared of redlinks- if the topic's notable, link away. (See WP:REDLINK)
  • "They recorded Primary Colours in a single day—from August 3 to 4, 2007—" ??
  • There's a little editorialising, which potentially compromises neutrality. "in just four hours" and "a cost of only", for example.
  • Also be aware of undefined jargon- 8-track, overdub, guitar chopping
  • You've got some very short sections- most album articles don't need a whole section for the title or the release.
  • "colors are made by combining primary colours" What's the Australian spelling?
  • ""It's like sounds as well - drums and guitars - you get four dudes together and they come up with this," he added.[7]" Editorialising.
  • Be aware of MOS:LQ
  • The Fall and The Pixies, surely

Feel free to strike/reply inline/whatever. I think it would now probably be best for me not to be the GA reviewer if you renominate so that you can hear another voice. J Milburn (talk) 19:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)[edit]

The article The Harrowing (Inside No. 9) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:The Harrowing (Inside No. 9) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. 23W 21:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of The Harrowing (Inside No. 9) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cbl62 (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)