User talk:Jabowery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello Jabowery and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!


Thanks for being a conscientious editor and citing your sources, but including the complete reference mid-sentence is very distracting. The Book Reference template is intended for use in separate refence sections. The references should be moved and a footnote used to indicate the citation. See also: Template talk:Book reference. Thanks, -Willmcw 02:17, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that. It looks very professional! Cheers, -Willmcw 20:42, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)


How much is the theory accepted by scientists? The existence flooding event of Black Sea got disputed over time, AFAIK. Pavel Vozenilek 23:16, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Holocaust denial[edit]

Jim, your comment was out of order. "Jews should not be allowed to occupy positions of trust and authority, either in the public or private spheres, among other peoples due to their ethnocentrism ..." This kind of comment is not acceptable, regardless of which race or ethnicity it's directed against, so please stick to content in future. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Edit warring on race[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Race. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -Longing.... 21:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of White Working Class[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article White Working Class has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition. WP:NOTADICT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gosox5555 (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of White working class[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated White working class, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White working class. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewontin's Fallacy[edit]

You appear to be the original contributor to this article - I am notifying you of the AfD discussion accordingly. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Pathogen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Housewitz for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Housewitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Housewitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (talk) 14:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vacancy formation energy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vacancy formation energy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PKT(alk) 21:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)