User talk:Jackiespeel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!
Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).


(Posted to my user page rather than here)


Hello! I've translated Poisonous pedagogy from the corresponding German article. I had one open issue, described on the talk page. Chonak 02:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello,

I don't know whether I can just jump in and offer some insights. I have not read all the conspiracy theory pages as yet, however, I am convinced that most of the conspiracy theories have a nugget of truth in them. I for one know for a fact that the 1969 Moon walk did not take place, perhaps in California, but not on the moon. I was on duty at the BBC in London when all this was supposed to take place and recorded that they did the take off and landing simultaneously, and the sound recording probably came out of the BBC studios.

The Vietnam war and the bombing of Cambodia was something America wanted to forget and what better boost for the American morale than supposed Space conquest.

I spoke to one man whose father was an engineer in America at the time, and he told his son "it did not happen".

Therefore I believe that conspiracy theories are political ploys to placate the masses.

I like your interest in Women as Theological Figures. The da Vinci Code proved that women as theological figures have been vanquished since the males realised that a few could control the many through religion, and they are not likely to relinquish that power.

Enjoyed chatting.


Stations[edit]

Hi. I see you;'re adding some stations. Could you check out the format and links on some of the existing stations, and maybe follow the established pattern? Links from UK railway stations - C, for instance, point to existing station articles. Thanks. --Tagishsimon

Textiles[edit]

Definitely wants an update. There is quite a lot of good stuff in the [[1911 encyclopaedia]as a basis. If you don't have one I suggest you get a good ASCII text editor and download the raw texts from the EB onto pages on that. Work on it offline and then upload into the finished result into the Wiki editor for the final tweaking. I use note Tab Pro. The link I put on the bottom of thre textile pages a few days ago has a lot of very good stuff indeed on weaving Apwoolrich 17:36, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Copyrights, stubs, and the watchlist[edit]

Thanks for your questions on my talk page. I apologize for not responding more promptly, but I was away from Wikipedia for a while due to some personal issues. I don't have the time to fully answer your questions here, but, if you haven't already, I'd suggest asking at the Help desk where someone can help you better. Good luck!  – Jrdioko (Talk) 03:08, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

RE: Women as theological figures[edit]

Hi there- I noticed your plea for non-Western religion contributions on the Buddhism talk page. I've got a very rough sketch of a structure for the article as a whole on one of my scratch pages- take a look at User:Spasemunki/temp2 if you're so inclined. In terms of naming, I was thinking that maybe 'Women in Religion' was most appropriate- my personal bias is against using 'theology' since my primary intereset is Buddhism, and we're sort of short a 'theos' (I have seen 'Buddhology' used for consistancy from time to time, which I remain a bit ambivalent about). I'm wondering if you think what I have whomped together should start a seperate article, or if there is some good way to incorporate it with what's already on the WATF page. I'm sure that the Christian and Muslim sections are a bit pathetic, but it's mostly meant as a 'proof of concept'. --Clay Collier 11:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

I added the information from the shamanism article to the article Women as theological figures just as you suggested on the shamanism talk page.--Fang 23 (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Invasions of Earth in science fiction[edit]

Merged page into Alien invasion, as you requested. Sharaith 11:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Gex[edit]

Could you add more detail about the compromise reached between Switzerland and France? If the info is only in French, I'd be happy to translate it. (I live in Gex!) UrsusMaximus 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

de:Schreibgerät[edit]

Hi, I was just thinking of removing this from the G-E translation request list (as the German article is just a series of interwiki links) and adding it to the E-G translation request list - is that OK with you? Saint|swithin 14:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


Hillingdon Borough Libraries[edit]

Can 2.85.6.26 being the IP for the above be unblocked please - as it has been blocked for some time, and whoever set off the problem has surely gone away (while I want to contribute to Wikipedia). Jackiespeel 15:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I have been working away from the Internet for most of the past week, so I have only picked up your e-mail to me tonight/this morning. I have unblocked 82.198.250.77 as requested. I will ask you to keep an eye on the contributions from this IP address and alert an Administrator when signs of vandalism become apparent. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  00:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
In relation to your comment here, you may want to have your say at this discussion. Thanks, Ansell 09:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


Editing Wikipedia[edit]

As the two library systems I tend to use have a default status of blocked IPs, I will be doing much less with Wikipedia, until an alternative system is developed.


Jackiespeel 17:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


Hungarian Revolution of 1956[edit]

Hi Jackiespeel, long ago you were active in editing this article and even asked about its 50th anniversary. You may be interested to know it is a Featured article candidate now and we hope to see it up on the main page on 23 Oct. If you have a moment, perhaps you could browse by and give a review (its come a long way). Thanks in advance, Istvan 08:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Former Countries[edit]

I would like to invite you back to WikiProject Former countries. You were previously a member of its former incarnation WP Historical States. The objective of this project is still to improve the content and accessibility of articles on former countries. A taskforce for the states of the Holy Roman Empire has also been started and the child project on Prussia has also been revived. This restart is still in its early days but it would be great to have you back. - 52 Pickup 18:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


Le Palais du Thés[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Le Palais du Thés, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Le Palais du Thés. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 18:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Failed history[edit]

I don't see anything about Edward VIII coronation notepaper at Talk:Chiltern Hundreds. If you had replied on Talk:Failed history or my user talk page (instead of e-mailing me), I would have gotten back to you several months earlier... AnonMoos 11:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Failed history[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Failed history, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. —Mira 08:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Failed history[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Failed history, has been listed by me at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failed history. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. —Mira 07:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

  • It does not look like it is going to make it. I personally think it could make a good article if you could find reference to support it and make it more encyclopedic. Jeepday 04:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
  • This article is now on Wikinfo. Jackiespeel 21:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Ruthenium (II) tris (bathophenantroline disulfonate)[edit]

You have requested cleanup of Ruthenium (II) tris (bathophenantroline disulfonate)

 Can someone translate this into something approaching English? Jackiespeel

I have read the article and I found it well written. Maybe it uses specialized language, but I consider that such kind of words should be common knowledge for someone who is looking for information about Ruthenium (II) tris (bathophenantroline disulfonate).

I have tagged the article as "insuficient context" {{context}}. If consider this is not applicable please modify it.

Will whoever wrote the above please sign it. The article does not make sense to anyone who is not familiar with the subject (as someone else has added)

Conservapedia[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. VanTucky (talk) 18:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea what you're talking about with the archives business. You might try the WP:Help desk. VanTucky (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Centre for Future Studies[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Centre for Future Studies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ARendedWinter 15:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of AIM25[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on AIM25 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RichardΩ612 22:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2008[edit]

Skeleton in the Cupboard[edit]

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Skeleton in the Cupboard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


The main reason I have given on the PROD is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary - articles need to be more than just the definition of a word or phrase. Also, articles need to quote reliable sources to back up what they say. JohnCD (talk) 22:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

See my comment on the talk page. As with Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells sometimes a dicdef can be developed.

As the phrase is used regularly - and is the title of an episode of Yes Minister - there should be something on it - or at least a redirect to the relevant Wiktionary page (which itself could be expanded).

22:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Women as theological figures Part 2[edit]

I made a section on Jainism as you requested, but as of right now it's pretty small because I could only think of three. If you contact some other WP:JAIN members, they'll probably bombard you with names, and I can help sort out the unimportant ones. Please, try to find any information you can. --Qmwne235 01:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Last of the Summer Wine are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the alert[edit]

ON the Rupert of Hentzau page, you pointed out that the crisis of conscience link went somewhere unrelated. Thanks, and I've fixed it, but next time your eagle eyes spot an error of this sort, please be bold and edit away! BrainyBabe (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Last of the Summer Wine[edit]

Unless you can find a secondary source which includes such information, it would be considering original research and in violation of Wikipedia policies. Redfarmer (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I did not mean to offend you. However, the talk page of the article has been used for discussion before and, in all honesty, you didn't say anything about wanting to incorporate the information in an article-you simply said it was a passing observation. If I misinterpreted it, I apologize. Redfarmer (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

IP block exemption[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Thatcher 17:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Random orphan article[edit]

Hi Jackiespeel, I really like your random orphan idea. I'm going to put a page together to do it. I doubt the Powers That Be would allow it in the toolbox, but maybe I can at least put it in the WP:Orphanage project. Thanks for the idea! Cheers, JaGatalk 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Religion and politics[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Religion and politics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. warrior4321 04:35, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Centre for the Economics of Education[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Centre for the Economics of Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Explodicle (T/C) 13:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed list of political disasters killing multiple leaders/elite men etc[edit]

I think the idea you floated at the air crash talk page is a good one. It won't be a long list, but that might not be a downside. I'd suggest something like these qualifications:

  • Died violently at a single event, limited in time and space.
  • At least three "leading men" (king, royal heir apparent, queen, leading noble, minister, top brass military man, president, PM etc) dead.
  • Õccurred in peace or (if in wartime) at least not through a deliberate military operation. Definite coups, revolutions and rebellions excluded: they nearly always claim deaths of this kind.

Let's see where we land with this! Strausszek (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Harrow & Wealdstone station[edit]

Further to your comment on Talk:British Rail. What exactly are we looking for here? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 12:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Is this the sign? Is the file description correct?

File:British Rail sign abandoned footpath near Harrow & Wealdstone.jpg

Didn't look for the advert though! best, Sunil060902 (talk) 09:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


Ealing Libraries[edit]

Can I be allowed to edit on signing on with IP 82.198.250.68 which is for the above address - I am not the vandal. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

What the?[edit]

Hello. I see one of my userpages User:Lozleader/lcc has been deleted/and or moved to mainspace as List of members of London County Council 1937-46. It looks like this was done at your request? I wish you'd asked me first, but no harm done.

It is still very much a work in progress (the aldermen, party strengths and so on need adding). I would suggest the article name should actually be List of members of London County Council 1937-49, as those elected in 1946 remained in office until 1949. Also it makes sense to make a break at that year as the 1949 LCC elections were conducted on the new boundaries introduced by the Representation of the People Act 1948 (which also changed representation to 3 councillors for each electoral area instead of 2)Lozleader (talk) 12:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Oh it was worse than I thought. i had only got as far as Greenwich. The entries in the rest of the table for previous elections: II copied and pasted to my userpage to work on it. I've had to delete them. Lozleader (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

They appeared to belong in the List of LCC... series - so confusion understandable: could you put in whatever link between the List... series and your page is appropriate.

I am developing the London wiki - www.london.wikia.com - and will do pieces on any LCC members I find sufficient information on (presently getting details for the LCC leaders), as probably more appropriate than WP. If you wish to copy and paste betwixt and between the two wikis, do so. Jackiespeel (talk) 14:00, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Moved it back to User:Lozleader/lcc; no harm done, I hope. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

London wiki[edit]

I am putting requests for pages variously on WP talk pages - but the wanted pages are many, there is only me at the moment, and my knowledge of sport is limited.

WikiProject Cleanup invitation[edit]

Edit-clear.svg

I've formatted the WikiProject Cleanup page to include members for those that are interested in joining, similar to how other projects have members. Since you've contributed relatively recently to the project's list page, I formally extend this invitation to join WikiProject Cleanup! I've also created a userbox template for members to use on their user pages. Thank you for your contributions to help improve Wikipedia! Northamerica1000(talk) 08:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Your Question[edit]

Sorry, I can't understand your question. You can ask in Englisch on that page. --Joe-Tomato (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

An invitation for you![edit]

Featured article collaboration.svg
Hello, Jackiespeel. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's article for improvement. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members. Happy editing! Northamerica1000(talk) 01:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

5D stellated shapes[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jackiespeel. You have new messages at Talk:Five-dimensional space.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 15:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Matthews Manly[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Matthews Manly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 22:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of William Romaine Newbold[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Romaine Newbold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 22:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Error in message[edit]

Hi. Just a ping that your last VPI edit left a dangling sentence-beginning. You might want to remove, or complete, that. (No reply needed) :) –Quiddity (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Robert Schuman Foundation (France)[edit]

To be honest, Jackie, Robert Schuman Foundation (European People's Party) looks rather suspect as well - no independent references. Can you add any? Deb (talk) 15:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I'll move it into your userspace.Deb (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Okay, it's here.Deb (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Leonell C. Strong[edit]

There isn't any place where there's a single list of all the possible categories that one can consult, unfortunately. Rather, all I can tell you is the same thing I told PinoyVeggie — one way you can find the appropriate categories is by checking our articles on similar topics (e.g. another person you know of in the same occupation or occupations); another way is by browsing the category tree from a general topic (e.g. since you describe him as a cancer scientist, you can start at Category:Scientists to see what subcategories exist for particular kinds of scientists and whether any of them fit Strong or not.)

But alternatively, please do understand that the categorization tag isn't meant as a personal tap on your nose. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and articles with maintenance issues are placed in project queues that a lot of people work on. So if you just don't know what the right categories are, it's perfectly okay to just leave it in the categorization queue so that somebody else can find the right categories for you. You're welcome to fix it yourself if you can, but you don't need to feel like you have an obligation to do so — if you don't already know how to fix it, it's perfectly okay to just leave it tagged in the queue for someone else to fix. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

London wiki[edit]

Hi Jackie, I saw you mention the London wiki somewhere. FYI, this site has a lot of suitably-licensed content that you can draw from. — Scott talk 19:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Would [1] be the most appropriate place for the website mentioned? Jackiespeel (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC) (Moved back here because I prefer conversing on a single page - S.)
No, what I mean is, all the text on that site is licensed with a Creative Commons attribution license. You can copy any text from it as long as you follow the terms in that license when you do. — Scott talk 11:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Five-dimensional space[edit]

Very sorry for the extremely late (over a year) reply – I must have accidentally unwatched the page. Well, I noticed your response and gave a reply. Double sharp (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)