User talk:Jarrio

Welcome to Wikipedia. ==Pediorodic table== A tag has been placed on Pediorodic table, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Hdt83 ^Chat 23:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Spirit Lost

A tag has been placed on Spirit Lost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Spirit Lost

A tag has been placed on Spirit Lost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Spirit Lost. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. You have been asked three times not to remove the speedy deletion tag from this (or indeed any article). Please do not do so again. If you wish to seek time to prove that an article meets wikipedia's standards do so without removing these notices. I have deleted the article because it still meets speedy deletion guidelines at this time. --VS ^talk 07:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alecsims

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alecsims, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Alecsims. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 06:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted this page - it was originally deleted under speedy classification per (CSD G1), was patent nonsense: an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content - only yesterday.--VS ^talk 06:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Syngrete'

A tag has been placed on Syngrete', requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 06:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Syngrete, you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Do not disrupt wikipedia by returning articles that have been deleted, removing templates or putting up pages that clearly do not meet the wikipedia guidelines. --VS ^talk 06:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alecsims

A tag has been placed on Alecsims, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --VS ^talk 06:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Putting up a welcome template

I am putting up a welcome template on your page in the hope that we can assist you in becoming a good wiki editor. We do welcome you but you need to abide by the rules and guidelines so by having this template (better late than never) you might be assisted and feel more supported.--VS ^talk 06:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jarrio, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. ----VS ^talk 06:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 07:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Native Americans in the United States, you will be blocked from editing. Anastrophe (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]