User talk:Jasenlee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Speedy deletion nomination of Fred Luddy[edit]

Icon delete.svg

A tag has been placed on Fred Luddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Regancy42 (talk) 09:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Fred Luddy[edit]

Rather than delete this page I have userfied it for you to User:Jasenlee/Fred Luddy where you can develop it until it is ready for the main space. In its present state it is speedy-deletable, not as advertising but as making no credible claim of significance or importance: it says only that he is CEO of a company he founded and has worked as CTO at two other companies. Also, it has no references, and per WP:Verifiability references are necessary for any article, but are particularly important for biographies of living persons; you may not be aware that there was a big fuss recently about the backlog of unsourced BLPs, and a new WP:BLPPROD system for dealing with new ones so that we do not add to the number. I know you have been here some time, but I still suggest you read WP:Notability and WP:Your first article for good advice on writing acceptable articles.

Articles about this person and his company have been deleted before after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Luddy and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Service-now.com, so you will need to make sure that you address the concerns expressed there, otherwise new articles about them may be liable to speedy deletion as a repost of deleted material.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ron Muns[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Ron Muns has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Merz Apothecary[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Merz Apothecary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Merz Apothecarynews, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —a thing 05:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ITRPM[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as ITRPM, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK 00:48, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

United States[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to United States, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mattnad (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)