User talk:Jasper Deng

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User page   Talk page   Non-autoconfirmed talk page    


This page is archived to User talk:Jasper Deng/Archives for threads older than 30 days.

RFA and RFB status[edit]

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 00:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC).—cyberbot I NotifyOnline

The chart at right lists the status of current requests for adminship and requests for bureaucratship, and is updated quarter-hourly by a bot. If the chart has only the title rows, it means there are no requests of one or both types.

Vandalism status[edit]

This meter is updated manually and displays the level of vandalism on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia vandalism information

Level 4

Low to moderate level of vandalism.

[viewpurgeupdate]


4.0CVS / 3.8RPM according to DefconBot 04:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Peacedove.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Windows Server 2012. Thank you!

Holiday wishes![edit]

Koch Snowflake 7th iteration.svg
Jasper Deng, I wish you excellent holidays and a glorious 2013!

I hope you'll have great meals, memorable family reunions and joyful times with those you love. :)


  • Salvidrim!, signing off on my best year yet, thanks in no small part to y'all!

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote[edit]

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

Consider joining the Tyop Contest![edit]

tyop

typo
Hi there! You're invited to participate in the first ever Tyop Contest! The Tyop Contest is a friendly competition between Wikipedia users to correct typos. The contest will be run from
February 1 to March 1, 2014. Depending on the typo you correct, you gain a certain number of points. The user with the highest number of points at the end wins the contest!
Considering joining? Enter yourself! -Newyorkadam

Holiday wishes![edit]

Koch Snowflake 7th iteration.svg
Jasper Deng, thanks for your hard work this year, you deserve wonderful holidays!

I wish you success and happiness in your endeavours for this coming year, and I hope we'll be able to carry on improving the wonderful project that is Wikipedia together! Keep rocking on! :)

  • Salvidrim!, wrapping up another great year of collaboration with y'all!

Merry Christmas![edit]

IPv6 prefix overly blocked[edit]

Hi Jasper,

I am aware that the blocking policy is set by each individual part of wikipedia (what a nice mess) but can you possibly forward this message to the right people so that they exempt the 2001:1af8:fe00::/39?

We have attempted to provide details at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jasper_Deng/IPv6

to get IPv6 in a better 'blocking' state, that is so that the admins know what to block and who to contact.

Unfortunately it seems that even though for instance:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2001:1AF8:FE00:845E:0:0:1:10

is banned because of:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2001:1AF8:0:0:0:0:0:0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1AF8:4700:A05A:1:0:0:256

That is a complete /32 being blocked.

Note that the /39 that SixXS uses out of that /32 is in RIPE whois:

inet6num:       2001:1af8:fe00::/39
netname:        SIXXS-NLHAA01
descr:          LEASEWEB BV -- IPv6 deployment
descr:          SixXS allocation for LEASEWEB BV POP

Hence, querying it should lead you to abuse@sixxs.net for any abuse there, next to the fact that we noted it on the above page.

Indeed the remainder of that /32 is not registered in whois; that does not mean there are no more specifics like that /39.

Can you please exempt the 2001:1af8:fe00::/39 used by users of nlhaa01 (https://www.sixxs.net/pops/leaseweb/) as these are actual users, not hosted customers like the rest of that /32?

Jeroen (talk) 09:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC) (info@sixxs.net for email, likely easier than this wiki for communications...)

@JeroenMassar: We have a {{webhostblock}}: Special:BlockList/2001:1af8:fe00::/39. Unfortunately it is not possible at this time to exempt subranges from a rangeblock. Individual users can request exemptions on a per-account basis by requesting IP block exemption. I would advise contacting the blocking administrator (Elockid (talk · contribs)) about the block if you feel that it is excessive.--Jasper Deng (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
That is a block for the whole /32 of Leaseweb, which is indeed primarily a hosting company. The 2001:1af8:fe00::/39 out of that is for SixXS though which are endusers. I'll see if Elockid is willing to resolve this problem properly... Jeroen (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Microsoft Windows#Genealogy[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Microsoft Windows#Genealogy. Thanks. Fleet Command (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews[edit]

Hello Jasper Deng. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)