User talk:JayJasper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Dylan: keyboards?[edit]

Hi JayJasper, Any thoughts on this question? Best, Mick gold (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio[edit]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, JayJasper. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 17:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Editing 1896 Presidential Ticket Box for Populist Inclusion[edit]

I have been trying to edit the Presidential Ticket Box to display the vote Jennings Bryan recieved on the Democratic and People's tickets seperately, with a third row for the total "complete" vote of the two, similar to how they are done with fusion tickets in New York. However I am unsure how to do this given the construction of the box is different from the more generic kinds I have used elsewhere, and experimentation has led nowhere. Essentially I am trying to restructure the box so it displays:
  • Presidential Candidate
    • Rows 1-3: William Jennings Bryan
  • Party
    • Row 1: Democratic
    • Row 2: Peoples's
    • Row 3: Total
  • Home State
    • Rows 1-3: Nebraska
  • Popular Vote (Count)
    • Row 1: 6,286,469
    • Row 2: 222,583
    • Row 3: 6,509,052
  • Popular Vote (%)
    • Row 1: 45.11%
    • Row 2: 1.60%
    • Row 3: 46.70%
  • Electoral Vote
    • Row 1: 149
    • Row 2: 27
    • Row 3: 176
  • Running Mate (Vice Presidential Candidate)
    • Row 1: Arthur Sewall
    • Row 2: Thomas E. Watson
    • Row 3: Greyed Out
  • Running Mate (Home State)
    • Row 1: Maine
    • Row 2: Georgia
    • Row 3: Greyed Out
  • Running Mate (Electoral Vote)
    • Row 1: 149
    • Row 2: 27
    • Row 3: Greyed Out
Now while this isn't important in the scheme of things, I'd like to know how to do it because I also plan(ned) on posting the state-by-state totals for the seperate Democratic and Peoples's tickets, and I fully understand how to work with the table used there tedious as it may be to edit. I ultimately figured that it would be better that the data in the Presidential Ticket box should match with the summaries in the State-by-State box (even though presently, due to me holding off, it doesn't), but I'm not keen on adding a bunch of reference tags detalining the break-down of the votes in about thirty of so states between the Democratic and Peoples's tickets. --Ariostos (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Wish I could help, Ariostos, but after taking a look at the box on that page I'm afraid I don't know to implement the changes you desire. You might be able to find help at the Teahouse or the help desk. Best of luck!--JayJasper (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anwar Ibrahim[edit]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anwar Ibrahim. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Editing for Women's History in March[edit]

Hello,

I am very excited to announce this month’s events, focused on Women’s History Month:

  • Sunday, March 8: Women in the Arts 2015 Edit-a-thon – 10 AM to 4 PM
    Women in the Arts and ArtAndFeminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. Free coffee and lunch served!
    More informationRSVP on Meetup
  • Wednesday, March 11: March WikiSalon – 7 PM to 9 PM
    An evening gathering with free-flowing conversation and free pizza.
    More informationRSVP on Meetup (or just show up!)
  • Friday, March 13: NIH Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon – 9 AM to 4 PM
    In honor of Women’s History Month, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is organizing and hosting an edit-a-thon to improve coverage of women in science in Wikipedia. Free coffee and lunch served!
    More informationRSVP on Meetup
  • Saturday, March 21: Women in STEM Edit-a-Thon at DCPL – 12 PM
    Celebrate Women's History Month by building, editing, and expanding articles about women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields during DC Public Library's first full-day edit-a-thon.
    More informationRSVP on Meetup
  • Friday, March 27: She Blinded Me with Science, Part III – 10 AM to 4 PM
    Smithsonian Institution Archives Groundbreaking Women in Science Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Free lunch courtesy of Wikimedia DC!
    More informationRSVP on Meetup
  • Saturday, March 28: March Dinner Meetup – 6 PM
    Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!
    More informationRSVP on Meetup

Hope you can make it to an event! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.


Thanks,

James Hare

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 10[edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg The Wikipedia Library

Bookshelf.jpg

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
  • New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
  • TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)[edit]

Hello! I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).

One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 2[edit]

For this month's issue...

Making sense of a lot of data.

Work on our prototype will begin imminently. In the meantime, we have to understand what exactly we're working with. To this end, we generated a list of 71 WikiProjects, based on those brought up on our Stories page and those who had signed up for pilot testing. For those projects where people told stories, we coded statements within those stories to figure out what trends there were in these stories. This approach allowed us to figure out what Wikipedians thought of WikiProjects in a very organic way, with very little by way of a structure. (Compare this to a structured interview, where specific questions are asked and answered.) This analysis was done on 29 stories. Codes were generally classified as "benefits" (positive contributions made by a WikiProject to the editing experience) and "obstacles" (issues posed by WikiProjects, broadly speaking). Codes were generated as I went along, ensuring that codes were as close to the original data as possible. Duplicate appearances of a code for a given WikiProject were removed.

We found 52 "benefit" statements encoded and 34 "obstacle" statements. The most common benefit statement referring to the project's active discussion and participation, followed by statements referring to a project's capacity to guide editor activity, while the most common obstacles made reference to low participation and significant burdens on the part of the project maintainers and leaders. This gives us a sense of WikiProjects' big strength: they bring people together, and can be frustrating to editors when they fail to do so. Meanwhile, it is indeed very difficult to bring editors together on a common interest; in the absence of a highly motivated core of organizers, the technical infrastructure simply isn't there.

We wanted to pair this qualitative study with quantitative analysis of a WikiProject and its "universe" of pages, discussions, templates, and categories. To this end I wrote a script called ProjAnalysis which will, for a given WikiProject page (e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek) and WikiProject talk-page tag (e.g. Template:WikiProject Star Trek), will give you a list of usernames of people who edited within the WikiProject's space (the project page itself, its talk page, and subpages), and within the WikiProject's scope (the pages tagged by that WikiProject, excluding the WikiProject space pages). The output is an exhaustive list of usernames. We ran the script to analyze our test batch of WikiProjects for edits between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, and we subjected them to further analysis to only include those who made 10+ edits to pages in the projects' scope, those who made 4+ edits to the projects' space, and those who made 10+ edits to pages in scope but not 4+ edits to pages in the projects' space. This latter metric gives us an idea of who is active in a certain subject area of Wikipedia, yet who isn't actively engaging on the WikiProject's pages. This information will help us prioritize WikiProjects for pilot testing, and the ProjAnalysis script in general may have future life as an application that can be used by Wikipedians to learn about who is in their community.

Complementing the above two studies are a design analysis, which summarizes the structure of the different WikiProject spaces in our test batch, and the comprehensive census of bots and tools used to maintain WikiProjects, which will be finished soon. With all of this information, we will have a game plan in place! We hope to begin working with specific WikiProjects soon.

As a couple of asides...

  • Database Reports has existed for several years on Wikipedia to the satisfaction of many, but many of the reports stopped running when the Toolserver was shut off in 2014. However, there is good news: the weekly New WikiProjects and WikiProjects by Changes reports are back, with potential future reports in the future.
  • WikiProject X has an outpost on Wikidata! Check it out. It's not widely publicized, but we are interested in using Wikidata as a potential repository for metadata about WikiProjects, especially for WikiProjects that exist on multiple Wikimedia projects and language editions.

That's all for now. Thank you for subscribing! If you have any questions or comments, please share them with us.

Harej (talk) 01:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Doug Casey for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doug Casey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Casey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 23:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Paradise (to be) Regained[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Talk:Paradise (to be) Regained requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)