|Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please:
*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted.
Thanks again for visiting.
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Threads with no replies in 7 days may be automatically moved.|
|This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.|
You were the admin who closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Pi Sigma in 2011, so I thought that I'd let you know that based on the fact that "Google News" has about 20 hits for Alpha Pi Sigma and they've expanded beyond California, that I'm looking to make a stub for them. (And probably for Gamma Phi Omega which is the other member of NALFO without a chapter).Naraht (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
As you suggested, I created a new page for CppDepend in my sandbow with more relevant external links, and here's the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guruwoman/sandbox Could you please confim that everything is good? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guruwoman (talk • contribs) 12:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
I see you're the guy who deleted the article on Lindsay Ashford (the famous one, not the unknown writer). Huge mistake. The debate on pedophilia is more vivid than ever, and I see him referenced regularly. The excuse for censoring him from Wikipedia was that he is not "notable". Which is kind of ridiculous when the only reason he was nominated for deletion was exactly that a lot of people noticed him and disagreed with him. You might want to re-think that decision :). As it stands, this is emberassing for Wikipedia. 2A02:FE0:C411:9D61:8CA3:A695:B419:8E8C (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)