User talk:Jeff G.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Top Links

Logs Warnings ©tags Del.guidelines {{Message}} CommonsHelper Flinfo MagicWords EditWL&UT EditTopLinks RC sp WP:ADCO/RFC BRFAer RfAdrafth Reflinks (simple semiauto)

[edit] Project Matrix

Page types Commons en de m b simple
User pages Commons en de m b simple
User page histories Commons en de m b simple
User talk pages Commons en de m b simple
User talk page histories Commons en de m b simple
Your Preferences ("Number of edits" includes deleted edits) Commons en de m b simple
Your Watchlists Commons en de m b simple
View and Edit Your Watchlists Commons en de m b simple
Contributions Commons en de m b simple
query.php contribution counter ("<count>" includes deleted edits) Commons en de m b simple
Edits (Interiot's external tool Tool1 AKA wannabe_kate; no mention of deleted edits) Commons en de m b simple
Edits (Interiot's internal tool Tool3 AKA count_edits; "Deleted edits" not included in "Total edits") Commons en de m b simple
Edits (Wikimedia's stable user edit counter editcount on the Stable server; "Deleted edits" not included in "Total edits") Commons en de m b simple
Contributions & Edits (Luxo's Global user contributions tool; includes deleted edits) all all all all all all
Gallery (Duesentrieb's WikiSense Gallery DuesenTool script) Commons en de m b simple
Project Matrices Commons en de m b simple
History of Project Matrices Commons en de m b simple
Edit Project Matrices Commons en de m b simple

Page last updated 16:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

Committed identity: 727de6b488652594443d85385a2cfd607fa15b739c8b755390d6621c3199b4d42f7c3877ca6746a6dc536836fcf0b8c96620135523fe88af6d6c2e44e87aa21b is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

[edit] Welcome to my user talk page!

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to the Monthly Archive for the month of the last timestamp. Sections with less than two timestamps (that have not been replied to) are not archived.


Current Monthly Archive

   (redlinked the first week
   or more of each month):

2012/March

Past and near future
   Monthly Archives:

2006/December
2007/January
2007/February
2007/March
2007/April
2007/May
2007/June
2007/July
2007/August
2007/September
2007/October
2007/November
2007/December
2008/January
2008/February
2008/March
2008/April
2008/May
2008/July
2008/August
2008/September
2008/October
2008/November
2008/December
2009/January
2009/February
2009/March
2009/April
2009/May
2009/June
2009/July
2009/August
2009/September
2009/October
2009/November
2010/January
2010/February
2010/March
2010/April
2010/May
2010/June
2010/July
2010/August
2010/September
2010/October
2010/November
2010/December
2011/January
2011/February
2011/March
2011/April
2011/May
2011/June
2011/July
2011/August
2011/September
2011/October
2011/November
2011/December
2012/January
This page has been vandalized at least 125 time(s) as of 29 December 2010.

Contents


[edit] Maintenance

[edit] Talkback and you've got mail notices

Please place your talkback and you've got mail notices below this line in this section (no subsection necessary). I plan to delete them when I have read them. Thank you.

[edit] Other correspondence

[edit] New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyes@wikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Huggle

Might want to be a little more careful with your reverts. [1] GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. Sorry I didn't go far enough back. I have been more careful with them in the last six months.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
No worries! I'd be lying if I said I haven't done the same sort of thing before. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Greg Daniels

Hey, perhaps "sexual" is translating wrong in this context? I mean to say it brought exuberant joy. 71.237.161.31 (talk) 03:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

No, that would be way more than "mainly positive reception". What's your native language?   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Revision (Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Assessment)

Sorry I've never really done this before and I don't have an account or know how to do things in the proper way but I did have a reason for editing the page and I doubt it will change any of the pages that fall under the low importance criteria.

As I posted on the Talk page this is why I changed it,

I removed the "or not adherents to atheism" clause from the first sentence of the low importance level category. It's difficult for me to understand what this is trying to say but from what I understand it's making the assumption that adherents to atheism are especially knowledgeable or educated about Christianity? Apparently enough to be included in a comparison with Christians themselves..? This generalization is as random as it is false. Also it disrupts the flow of the sentence and seemed like an unnatural addition.

I hope to hear your thoughts.

Preston D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.236.144 (talk) 04:12, 6 March 2012‎ (UTC)

Hi, Preston. You appear to be writing about Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Assessment and this edit. "or that are not adherents to atheism" was in this very first edit by Badbilltucker (talk | contribs) at 18:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC). Good luck contacting him, though, as he hasn't been heard from in four years (since a month after that edit).   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Revision (Talk:First Baptist Church (Hammond, Indiana))

Please review my edits on First Baptist. As I said on the talk page, my information had two sources, and was not based on a personal preference. Here are the two sources. http://www.fbchammond.com/new/what-we-believe/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-JnRbj8wqE Thank You. (99.146.113.3 (talk) 04:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC))

Thanks, but that info is best presented on Talk:First Baptist Church (Hammond, Indiana).   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Also, what do you think about creating a FBC controversy page. There def. is enough to fill an article. Half of the article should not be on controversy and scandals. There's way more stuff to write about than that. Do you think its kind of disproportional? (99.146.113.3 (talk) 04:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC))

Please feel free to draft one at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/First Baptist Church (Hammond, Indiana) controversy, which I just started for you. Please also draft a summary of it for the main article.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Editor review

Hi Jeff - I forgot to notify you yesterday that I commented on your editor review, so er... now I am. Cheers, Yunshui  12:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much!   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export