User talk:Jehochman

SOPA Initiative/Ideas nominated for deletion

See also: Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Ideas

Please see page..Thanks. Petersontinam (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Article titles and capitalisation case

An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Article titles and capitalisation. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Article titles and capitalisation/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 25, 2012, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Article titles and capitalisation/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Gianolibrad'oro.gif

I'm not replying to your last comment on User talk:GiacomoReturned because he left this comment on my page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARonhjones&action=historysubmit&diff=475453244&oldid=475452524) and I'm not reverting it, because I'm not playing his games - I did consider changing to fair use, but he had already reverted that action twice before, so what was the point, he was insisting on it being a free image because it was 3D and not 2D.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't know all the intricacies, but it is a 3D image. The question is what it's a useful item, like a coffee mug with a logo, or a shirt. A book has no use other than it's copyrighted purpose. I'd feel a lot better under fair use. Jehochman ^Talk 21:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

When does a 2D image become a 3D one - interesting argument - what about an oil painting that has texture because the paint has been put on with a spatula?

Anyway, I agree, fair use is typical for a book cover, but he obviously (for some reason) didn't want that. If I had accepted his argument when I read it, I would have moved it to commons, but I didn't and I'm certain it would have been deleted there.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

tldr

I have attempted to address concerns you raised on Jimbo talk.[1] I hope it is sufficient? My76Strat (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

rude?

Don't get why [2] is rude -- have asked ArbCom clerk (Salvio) to review. Nobody Ent 00:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Erm, I don't understand why it's rude either... Is there something I missed (not being a native speaker, there may be something rude I fail to notice)? Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

If you are ignorant of the history of that particular personal attack, you can contact me via email. I will not provide the details out in the open. Jehochman ^Talk 02:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Or he can Google "Jimbo Wales tshirt Ebay". --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I did.[3] I removed the comment again pending review, though I don't wish to edit war and it doesn't seem all that terrible to me. Jimbo Wales is WP:WELLKNOWN around here and I hope he's developed a sense of humor about these things, but the comment does seem kind of gratuitous and mean. - Wikidemon (talk) 02:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for explanation. Nobody Ent 03:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I mentioned this to Malleus.[4] - Wikidemon (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikidemon: I think that this is the diff you meant to post.[5] A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I thought it was possibly a little dodgy, but didn't want to delete it myself. Borderline-ish. (And I still want the hoodie, with a great big globe logo on the front ;P) Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation everyone, it turns out I was indeed missing something and my fellow clerk removed the offending post. Cheers. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Being Jimmy does not make one into a free-for-all target for personal attacks and irrelevant commentary. This isn't a case about Jimmy. His personal life has no place on Wikipedia, except for Jimmy Wales. Thank you all for sorting this out. Jehochman ^Talk 11:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Meowy

I think it would be worth giving you the heads-up, if you aren't already aware, that the block on Meowy (talk · contribs) has expired and the user has returned to editing. CT Cooper · talk 20:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)