User talk:Jessy9009

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jessy9009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Y Adhinarayana Reddy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mat ty.007 19:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Y Adhinarayana Reddy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Y Adhinarayana Reddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mat ty.007 19:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided, as you did with Y.Adinarayana Reddy. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Y.Adinarayana Reddy, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

brothe i am his grand son why are u editing it typed abt my grand father who is a freedom fighter aand he is not living he is dead now wtf who are u dissappoint us by saying he is still living bio etc etc

You're right, I'm sorry. The article is such a mess I forgot that it says he died in 2002. But as long as I have your attention, you need to do something about the article. Otherwise, it may not be permitted to remain at Wikipedia. First, Wikipedia strongly discourages editors from creating and editing articles in which they have a conflict of interest. Second, even though your grandfather is no longer living and not subject to the extra protection of WP:BLP policy, articles at Wikipedia must be sourced. You have NO sources in that article to back up all of the material. I stripped down the article partly for that reason. The article is also very poorly written, probably due to your language difficulties. However, without sources, it's not worth the trouble to clean it up. I'm going to put some maintenance tags on the article. Don't remove them. The tag you removed before was my error, so your removal was, of course, okay, but, generally, you are not permitted to remove what are called maintenance templates without fixing the problem they address.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My dear friend as u requested i have given you a source at the bottom of the page so please don't remove or put ant timers for it he is a great leader of indian freedom struggle he was also wven awarded tamara patra for his struggle so pls dont hurt our feeling. there are some more social activists like yerrapuReddy Ravindra reddy i am putting them also on wiki so that many people who are searchin for occurance of thair family and law records and psycology students to have projects on them so pls dont even remove yerrapuReddy Ravindra reddy also i will provide sources as fast as possible.okey

and if u have such problems with my english come and improve but just dont comment like that multiple tags how will it be for you if i say you dont know any thing about the humanity..

You may/seem to be inexperienced, but your behavior is reprehensible. You should not remove maintenance templates. You must provide few reliable sources to save these articles, if you want to write in Wikipedia, you have to follow Wikipedia rules and guidelines. See WP:RS and WP:V (click on these two links to see details on sources). And sign your posts using four tildes ~~~~ Tito☸Dutta 15:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of YerrapuReddy Ravindra Reddy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YerrapuReddy Ravindra Reddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YerrapuReddy Ravindra Reddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tito☸Dutta 14:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Rayachoti. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Samantha Ruth Prabhu has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 17:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i am a copyright holder

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Rayachoti. ///EuroCarGT 17:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry (User:Bb31323). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jessy9009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here USER BB23 PLS FORGIVE ME I HAVE REALISE PLS UNBLOCKE ME PLESASE SHOW MERCY ON ME MY GRACE I AM NOT A TRAITOR I NEVER BETRAYED ANY ONE

Decline reason:

That makes no sense whatsoever. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of YerrapuReddy Ravindra Reddy[edit]

The article YerrapuReddy Ravindra Reddy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]