User talk:JimmyButler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

_  :-)

Hi There, welcome aboard. Again :) David D. (Talk) 22:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

And welcome (back) from me too. You did some RReally gRReat woRRk, and I'm looking forward to seeing you in action once again. I'd suggest a more random selection of articles, though, and not getting too stressed replicating all your efforts in just the one place. I find that attending to a batch of articles on English grammar is a great de-stressing strategy! Snalwibma (talk) 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

wb :)--Filll (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Good to make contact again. One day I'll revisit IntrotoEvo properly, read the whole thing with fresh eyes, see what it looks like, think about how it might be improved - and probably do nothing! But it's pretty good as it is. Congratulations to you, above all people. I notice that our friend A******** has made zero edits since 31 Jan. I presume it was a one-purpose sock of some sort. Meanwhile, I'm pretty busy IRL and just glancing at WP once in a while. Snalwibma (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


Glad to see you punch in ... even if it’s only a glancing blow. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I couldn't find anywhere to put this so I'm just dumping this here. Your initiative is so very cool and I have immense respect for the idea. Not only is it fantastic in giving back contributions and teaching people to share knowledge in a community collaborative environment, but you're teaching the scientific method (fact checking, writing .etc). Good job Genjix (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Teacher Review

Will you please review Gambusia affinis? Patvac-chs (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Teacher review

Mr. Butler i know it may be a little late for this but if you would teacher review the Royal Tern i would greatly appreciate it. --Captain kirkintosh (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Another Teacher Review, I had Davis look it over as well. I put it up for peer review and its been up for almost 2 weeks.... I'm just curious if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. Especially with the Peer Review. Stanfordbound 14 (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Use the power of the orange bar. Leave messages on user talk pages and ask them to go to the Peer Review. That gets results much better than relying on some "system". People appreciate direct requests and the squeeky wheel gets the oil. Good luck.TCO (talk) 14:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Let yesterday be forever remembered...

We were on the front page yesterday! Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/January_4,_2012 Vancemiller (talk · contribs · count · email) 00:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Did you see the loggerhead attracted a song parody, apparently with the article as a source. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Someone in class caught that yesterday and shared. Always nice to know your efforts are viewed. If you take a look at the traffic on that page I'm sure it is a significant number of viewers. Congratulations. I will email Tim and let him know. --JimmyButler (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export