User talk:Everymorning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Jinkinson)
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Belle Knox AFD #2[edit]

The second AFD for Belle Knox has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. Gaijin42 (talk)

The Islington[edit]

Hello there .. Thank you for reviewing and your interest in "The Islington". I am very new to Wikipedia and need to understand what you need from me in order to prove to you that "The Islington" is one of the most profile Live Music Venues in London. I have referenced sources from The Independent newspaper, one of the biggest daily newspapers in the United Kingdom.

I would have though that would have been proof. Can you let me know - in laymans terms - what you need from me to keep this page active from deletion?



RfC: AfC Helper Script access[edit]

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


You posted to my Talk page stating that, in your opinion, my edits to the Marc Morano Wiki page were not "neutral". Please be more specific.

Every edit I had made was carefully supported by detailed references. Your removal of my edits has no such support. So please defend your position.

Your User Page indicates you are a college student, so it is likely you really don't know any science yet, and ought not be so quick to judge whether the edits of an adult are "neutral" or not. I graduated from one of the world's finest institutes of science and engineering, and have more than 40 years experience working in fields related to computer science, wireless telecommunications, satellite manufacturing, solar radiation and plasma physics, and the thermodynamics of energy transfer. I've also spent 15 years studying anthropogenic global warming in my spare time. Unlike you, I have developed the skills, tools, and mental capacity to investigate complex scientific problems over the course of my career, and my successful career in science proves the abilities I've acquired.

Of course, there is no such thing as "neutrality" on Wiki, so I reject your argument outright for removing my edits. In my opinion, the entire Wiki page on Morano had not been neutral until after my edits were added. For example, do you believe it was appropriate for someone to include recognition given (meant as an insult) in a section on "awards" received by Morano? If so, then perhaps you should check you own bias.

If you have no justification for your action, other than your opinion, then let's agree to let Wiki staff judge whether you or I possess more neutrality on this matter. Please rescind your request for removal of my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olsonjs444 (talkcontribs) 16:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

  • The sources you added (e.g. this blog) were not reliable, and some of the stuff you added was not sourced at all. The edit of yours that stated "the criticism leveled at Morano was originally made by Andrew Revkin, another left-wing journalist who has written for Time Magazine in the USA." is problematic as well because it appears to be original research. If you are still convinced that your addition was correct, you can discuss it on the talk page of Morano's article. Everymorning talk 16:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The problematic edit you referenced regarding Revkin as the source of the critical comment against Morano can certainly be referenced from a reliable source. No such reference should be necessary for someone familiar with Morano's and/or Revkin's biographical info. Do you have any other objections? If not, then I'll provide the reliable reference on Revkin and expect you to reverse your edits. olsonjs444 talk — Preceding undated comment added 06:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


Hello Everymorning, Since it appears you are a busy person, I will be curt: I am new to the behind the scenes wiki-pedia world so please don't expect me to know all the nuances.

I think you have an interest in the homeopathy article; if not please don't read any further and disregard this post; no answer is necessary.

In the interest of improving the content by adding an element that is not discussed, I bring up the following for consideration:

Yes, there is no scientific basis for showing that the homeopathic process for selecting ingredients and preparing homeopathic drugs is based on sound reasoning; BUT, if I randomly concoct a large enough sample of homeopathic remedies, there is a finite probability that some of them will actually work. I think this is indeed the case and anyone who states that because there is no basis of science in the homeopathic process, none of the homeopathic drugs can have any efficacy is not exercising logical thought processes. This aspect of the discussion has been left out of the article. I also have not seen it discussed anywhere else; but I think to have a complete and unbiased article something should be said of this.


The December issue of the Life Extension Foundation's magazine has a summary of the studies done on the concept that taking Zinc supplements may prevent or speed up the cure of the common cold. Here is a link to the article: < > The article does present some scienctific studies that do show a cause and effect between Zinc and cold prevention.

If you read the article and delve into the footnotes you will find further sustaining data on how the Zinc ions travel to the sinuses from the mouth. See George Eby's article on the mouth to nose closed electric circuit: < > Eby's article presents a theory with substantiating data to explain how Zinc ions can propagate from a lozenge in the mouth to the nasal passages via an electromotive force that naturally exists in the human body and propels the Zinc ions out of the mouth and into the nasal passages.

THE ABOVE TWO REFERENCES present some evidence from a scientific point of view that Zinc lozenges can and do assist in preventing and curing the common cold. The Zi-cam product is mentioned in the wikepedia article; but not in a positive light. In addition, Life Extension is now marketing a Zinc lozenge as a cold remedy. At the insistence of our daughter, my wife and I have recently experimented with Zi-cam to prevent colds and so far the results appear to be consistent with the allegation that if taken promptly and consistently it works. ALTHOUGH HEAD COLDS ARE NOT USUALLY FATAL, THEY ARE A LARGE NUISANCE TO SOCIETY WITH LOST WORK AND IN GENERAL FEELING BAD FROM THE SYMPTOMS; FROM THAT ASPECT, I BELIEVE THIS TOPIC IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO WARRANT INCLUSION IN THE ARTICLE because as the article is currently written it implies that all homeopathic medicines are 100% impotent.

I am not an editor for Wiki-pedia but am hopeful that an editor with an interest in this article will read up on what I have presented above and unless there is good reason to reject this contention, incorporate the substance of this post into the wikipedia article. JPfrmME (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)JPfrmME

DYK for Tor Wager[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emma Sulkowicz[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Emma Sulkowicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article violates WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:BIO1E, WP:N/CA, and WP:ROUTINE. Because the coverage of this subject matter is indistinguishable from tabloid sensationalism and because the accuser is not notable for any reason beyond her accusations, this article meets the criteria for deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ustawa (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


The source said more than just the following. "A day after the post a website called "Monsanto Collaborator" appeared online which listed the names of scientists and journalists who allegedly collaborate with the bio industry.[17]" The reader won't understand how a separate website is related without explaining the story behind it.

"NOTE: The GLP has been able to confirm that Adams is indeed the mastermind and financier behind the Monsanto Collaborator’s website. The story has now taken an even more bizarre twist, as Adams, facing multiple investigations from law enforcement officials, including the FBI, is now trying to make it appear that not only did he not oversee the project, but that it was a set up by Monsanto in a twisted plot to discredit anti-GMO critics."[1]

I think another sentence can explain it a bit more. I can't think of a way to summarise the bizarre twist. QuackGuru (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

  • There used to be text in the article about Adams' response to accusations that he was behind the Monsanto Collaborators website, but it was removed by Jytdog. [2] He called it "an endless road of tit for tat." Perhaps you should ask him whether he thinks it is a good idea to include information about what Adams was accused of, how he responded to the accusations, etc. Everymorning talk 19:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Maconie[edit]

I'm not sure this RfD has been opening in good faith. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Sony Pictures Entertainment hack[edit]

Harrias talk 14:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Authority control|VIAF=40543312|LCCN=n89655618[edit]

Hi, Just wanted to thank you for your contributions to Fred Cate and to ask a question. What does this do:Authority control|VIAF=40543312|LCCN=n89655618? Thanks in advance. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  • I'm not exactly sure. But I've been adding it to bios for more than a year now. Apparently according to WP:VIAF, it "add[s] additional value for the reader." Everymorning talk 15:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Journey to middle earth 2[edit]

Hi. You PRODded it, but I think a speedy tag would have been better. For one thing, "fieldray productions" doesn't google. Plus, the name was probably borrowed from "Howard Shore: Creating The Lord of the Rings Symphony: A Composer's Journey Through Middle-earth". Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Do you mean G3 (blatant hoax)? Everymorning talk 00:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Also, there is one Google result (besides Wikipedia) for Fieldray Productions. [3] Still, it's possible this is part of the hoax as it's on a free webhosting service. Everymorning talk 01:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Blatant hoax or just WP:A7 because who knows, maybe some kids and their handicam have a real, but non-notable picture in the works. I usually reserve WP:A11 for stuff like Strawberry-scented Zebra herds of northern Canada, All aluminum oven mits, or List of balding hedge fund managers on Pluto. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
I see it's already been deleted per A11. BTW, I tend to be cautious about tagging things for speedy deletion because sometimes when I do so, other editors remove my tag. Everymorning talk 13:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Valentine Greets!!![edit]

Wikilove2 new.png Valentine Greets!!!

Hello Everymorning, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,
--L235 (talk) As a courtesy, please ping me when replying. 01:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A page that was voted to be a redirect that someone restarted again[edit]

So I was looking over my watchlist and clicking on some of the pages, I found this one Doyle (band) which was voted to be a redirect last May to another page but in November someone decided to deleted the redirect and restart the page. I just moved it back to the redirect, what I'm wondering is what is the protocol when someone does that? Given that it was a few months ago that it happened, so yeah. Wgolf (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

  • You could always ask for the redirect to be protected at WP:RFPP to enforce the AFD outcome. Everymorning talk 01:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks-if it happens again I probably will. Wgolf (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Yoga as[edit]

Where you cleared out[4] the non-medrs compliant source? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Oops, thanks for pointing that out, I will fix it immediately. Everymorning talk 15:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

2015 Haiti Carnival accident[edit]

--Nakon 00:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Villa Clare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peachtree Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)[edit]

The article Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Nusenda Credit Union[edit]

Hi there Everymorning, I see you took the time to add a reference and categories to a newly created article Nusenda Credit Union. The creator of the article keeps removing the content you added, and has made some comments you might be interested in seeing.[5] The editor seems to think you have some agenda against their organization, when it's quite obvious you came across a new article and only tried to help. I have no idea what the editors problem was with the categories, but I get the feeling they think because it's their organization, that they are the ones to edit it. Sounds like a conflict of interest to me. Cmr08 (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the heads up; I have responded on the creator's talk page. Everymorning talk 00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
That's good, I was in the middle of writing a comment myself but got the edit conflict. I'll leave it at that for now and see what they have to say. Cmr08 (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs)[edit]

The article Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Dhanish Karthik[edit]

Hi Everymorning, you had marked my article Dhanish Karthik for possible deletion due to no sources. I was in the process of adding in reliable sources which I have done now. Please let me know if there are any other issues.

--Nicoleww1985 (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Nicole W


Hi Everymorning, you tagged the page that I created as a possible infraction of copyright because the content has been copy-pasted from another page. This is text that we created, and I wanted to ask you if we can paste it in both sites, and if so, how do I remove the message. Thank you. laura — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura.costas (talkcontribs) 15:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Everymorning. You have new messages at Smileguy91's talk page.
Message added 20:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

smileguy91Need to talk? 20:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Everymorning. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 02:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
  • Thanks, I saw your message already, actually. Thanks for the feedback. Everymorning talk 03:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)