User talk:Johnparkw/Sandbox

This is a "Scratch Pad" for johnparkw. Please use my talk page for edits or comments. John Park (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a test[edit]

This is how a citation gets marked.^{[citation needed]} John Park (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image handling[edit]

Sub sub heading 1a??[edit]

Images for my projects[edit]

Partners[edit]

User talk:Good Olfactory
User talk:Secisek —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnparkw (talk • contribs) 18:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
User:Tb -- John Park (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

partial edits[edit]

This article is about the Christian Church (Disciples). It shares common roots but is no longer affiliated with two other groups:

Churches of Christ which went their separate way officailly in 1906.
Independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ which separated in the years following 1968.

For information on those movements, please read the articles about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnparkw (talk • contribs) 13:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions[edit]

My question is this: Do you have any suggestions for proper protocol for removing extraneous material from an article, without prompting a battle? My inclination on my next round of edits, is to first move it into the history section headed "Divisions" and then remove it completely when I get to the polishing stage. Is there a better approach? John Park (talk) 16:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You didn't ask me but I have been following your edits with interest, and am excited about the improvements you are making. I would say that I think it is important that the article say something about the relation of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) with the other Churches of Christ. There is an existing section titled "Division" which I think is nicely written to address the issue. But I think that, from the perspective of the other Churches of Christ, the article might seem a little POV-centric. It sounds a bit as if the history section is written in such a way as to suggest that the current Disciples of Christ was founded back then, oh, and there were these other groups that split off. From their perspective, they were founded back then too, and have an equal share in the majority of that history. Perhaps it might work to do two things: take the paragraph you rightly deleted (IMO) and see if there are particular facts or perspectives that might well be incorporated in the existing Division section; and have the history begin with some kind of acknowledgement that the current Disciples are only one strand that originated in the story of Scott and Campbell. Tb (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Good advice. Remember to ask that additions be cited or you will never get it to FA. -- Secisek (talk) 17:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help and the affirmation! I see the value of collaboration, and appreciate the help, from both of you! John Park (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

citation templates[edit]

Wikipedia:Citation templates —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnparkw (talk • contribs) 06:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration movement article structure[edit]

Contents

OUTLINE 1 Early history

1.4 Other related groups (retitle something like: Influences & context that set the tone)

Currently this section is about influences on Stone, Perhaps it should move into the Stone section as introductory materials.

1.1 Stone movement

1.1.1 Early influences

1.1.1.1 Okelly & guifford accademy

1.1.1.2 Cane ridge revival

1.1.2 Stone's tenuous ordination by Presbyterieans

1.1.3 The Springfield Presbytery

1.1.4 The "Christians" only

1.2 Campbell movement

1.2.1 Tutoring in John Locke

1.2.2 University of Glasgow

1.2.3 Presbyterians in the new world still fighting European battles (newlight/old light -- Seceder/ Anti-Seceder -- Burgher/ Anti Burgher)

1.2.4 The sojourn with the Baptists

1.2.5 Free at last to be reformers

1.3 Merger of the Stone and Campbell movements

1.5 Internal strains

1.6 Division

3.1 Churches of Christ and Christian Church separation

3.1.1 Factors leading to the separation of 1906

3.1.2 Aftermath

2 Key principles

4 Time line

3 Twentieth century divisions

3.2 Variations with the Churches of Christ

3.2.1 Largest subgroups

3.2.2 Other issues

3.3 Churches of Christ/International Churches of Christ Split

3.4 Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) / Independent Christian Churches - Churches of Christ Separation

7 The Restoration Movement internationally

1.7 Pioneers

6 Christian Churches and Churches of Christ reunion efforts

8 See also

8.1 External links

8.2 History and Sources

8.3 Notes

8.4 References

Text to drop or redistribute

5 Modern branches Though I think some of the best writing is in this section, this should be incorporated into the separations text.

1.8 Early congregations (Drop this one?? or move to footnote status at the end) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnparkw (talk • contribs) 13:52, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sample Welcome[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) will produce your name and the current date. You should always sign talk pages, but not articles. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnparkw (talk • contribs) 16:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]