User talk:Johnsoniensis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Formerly User talk:Felix Folio Secundus

  1. ^ Barber 1986, p. 141

Johnsoniensis, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Johnsoniensis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
User:Johnsoniensis
Born (2014-04-11) April 11, 2014 (age 0)
Manchester, England
Other names User:Felix Folio Secundus
Education University of Oxford
Known for
Awards

Rogation Days[edit]

Thank you for your reply - I think it might be helpful if you were to express your opinion on the article's Talk page.

Robocon1 (talk) 19:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, the section to look at is "Custom carried by Slave Holders" Robocon1 (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the heads up.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Gentile de' Becchi[edit]

I notice that you have just tagged the article as C-class for a number of categories.

C-class: The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.

  • The important content is covered
  • It doesn't contain irrelevant material
  • It is fully referenced
  • It doesn't require substantial cleanup.

The article is short because there is not a great deal of information available. All the apparent major events of de' Becchi's life are covered, except his date of birth and education, which are unknown to his biographers.

I would rather that you didn't assess the article at all, rather than assess it as a C-class, when it is plainly to developed, too well written and too well supported with references to fit in that category. Once assessed, an article tends to stay that with that assessment. Would you mind taking another look at it. Amandajm (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Having has a second look it is apparent that the article is of a higher standard and the content is thoroughly referenced. Sorry for being too careless earlier.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk:List of people from Evanston, Illinois[edit]

Hello, recently you added a BioProj assessment to the List of people from Evanston. I edit a lot of these lists and am an active member of the BioProject. I don't disagree with you that this is a Biography related list, but I never saw it that way and was simply inquiring about your reasoning. Cheers. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

If I come across a list which does not have a banner for WP Lists already I usually add one. In the case of lists of people I would add a WPBIO banner as well on the basis that it relates to the organization of biography articles. ("The Biography WikiProject concerns the creation, development, and organization of Wikipedia's articles about persons.") I know I am not a member of those projects so if this was against policy I would stop this.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
P.S. There are also many cases like Talk:List of Bohemian consorts where the article is relevant to a particular work group, in this case Royalty.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
No, no policy. I was just seeing if you had a compelling enough reason to motivate me to go through and add it to all the People from...lists. Your reason is sound enough for your edit, but not compelling enough for me as I doubt anyone for the project would take notice, if that makes any sense. Cheers. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Bare URLs in Simona Halep wiki?[edit]

Hello, Naki here! Please could you let me know which URL citations exactly are bad/bare? Thanks in advance. Naki (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Christian music[edit]

Thanks for correcting Geistliche Chormusik and the project tag. Most of the other works by Schütz, and hundreds of works by Bach would be in the same project, right? And many other articles I wrote, such as Rutter's Magnificat, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Precious[edit]

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Cornish villages and churches
Thank you, Oxonian bookworm, for quality articles on Cornish villages and churches such as Tintagel Parish Church, and for gnomish work in article assessment for projects, style improvements, redirects, moves, precision, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Kenites[edit]

Category:Kenites, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Rivers Articles[edit]

Hi Johnsoniensis. Thought I would drop by and say thank-you for the rivers assessments you have done over the last year. I think we were both trying to reach the same goal of reducing the Category:Unassessed River articles to zero, which has now been done, at last. Thanks again...Jokulhlaup (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Confused by your edit comment[edit]

Sorry to bother you, but on this edit you placed the comment: "wp x 2". May I bother you to explain what "wp x 2" means? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

It is an abbreviated way of saying two WikiProject banners have been added to the page; "difference between revisions" will show what they are.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 12:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Yes, I'd worked out that it was an abbreviated way of saying that it was 2 x something - just not what the "something" was. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Costello[edit]

Hello, that article referenced this book and I can find no mention of that spelling there so presume it is a mistake. Vladeraz (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Image placement[edit]

Hi Johnsoniensis. I see you're moving images on Doom Bar over from the left. My understanding was that images should be staggered from left to right, per WP:IMGLOC. You say it's deprecated in the top left of sections, can you point me to the discussions where that was decided so I can have a look? Cheers WormTT(talk) 11:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

weird[edit]

Not sure why you wanted to paint the talk page tags blue in your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Mexican_saints - it would be much more helpful to do the full assess - as it is you have left ?? in the importance.... Also I rarely ever see any of my talk page editing added or amended. (most eds are not the slightest interested in maintaining project tags) . The 'List' project tag in effect becomes redundant if you have put 'list' as the class in the other projects. I could go on at length, but... If indeed you are interested in project tagging, or in assessing - good luck to you - there is no support for the activity (not that I have ever seen). satusuro 13:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Even weirder - saints - is a stand alone project - and by extension should have only the tag for that project at project pages - so a bit mystified as to why biography creeps in there... ? satusuro 13:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh well happy christmas, and in all AGF and all the rest your answer feels quite unconvincing to say the least, trust you have a good new year as well. satusuro

Isabel Bolton[edit]

Thanks for fixing my error re. Bolton's first name in the 'biography' template I had added to the her page. Careless mistake on my part while copy-pasting the template from another page. - Xenxax (talk) 12:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)