User talk:Jojalozzo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

TUSC token f55b91cbe975dd875728f9d9718d0bc6[edit]

My TUSC token.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
844 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: A ThinkPad (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
16 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Andy Albright (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,462 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Costco (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
628 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Window (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,870 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Socialism (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
1,057 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Neologism (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
82 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
486 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Price discrimination (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Communications in the Isle of Man (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
13,477 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Carbon tax (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
2,780 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Economics (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
271 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Jean Tirole (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
94 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: C White pride (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
152 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Bicameralism (psychology) (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
1,252 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Digital marketing (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
35 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Racial whitening (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
124 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Grid-tie inverter (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
566 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Professional certification (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
80 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Naprapathy (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
213 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA White Brazilian (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Wikify
51 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Richard Dyer (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aircraft Structures Technician (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Musa Bagh (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Belgian Civil Aviation Authority (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
34 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Legend Holdings (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
415 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Second World (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 2006–07 Bahraini Premier League (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
66 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Netduino (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
158 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Business sector (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 2000–01 Bahraini Premier League (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Gallery Added[edit]

(I'm copying this to Talk:Overpass#Gallery_Added let's continue the discussion there.)

Regarding the images on the article Overpass, the prior arrangement was somewhat unsightly due to the relatively small amount of text on the page and the large number of images. I left one image out of the gallery because, in my opinion, it was the image that is most descriptive of the concept of Overpass/flyover.

I did intend to move the image to the right side of the article, but I forgot to do that. I have just corrected that oversight.

In your note you mentioned that the images were, "moved ... to the railroad overpass section." I'm not sure what you mean. The article, and the gallery I added, is about both highway and railroad overpasses. What I did was create a gallery for all but one of the images to make the article flow better visually.

Finally, the policy I mentioned in my edit summary is Section 3.2 of Wikipedia Manual of Style/Images which talks about how to locate an image. But I was also influenced by Section 2 of Wikipedia:Picture tutorial, Avoiding stack-ups where we learn that stacking multiple images against large amounts of white space is visually undesirable. My edit was intended to fix that.

Finally if your interest is in railroad overpasses, I think the article would benefit from more railroad related images. If you have any that would be appropriate that would be great.

— Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib)  –  26 January 2015, 08:34 (UTC)

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter[edit]

Rescuesquad - No text.png

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Volume I, Issue III
February 2012

To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page.
ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.


changes you reverted[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Talk:Western_world#Repeated_wikilinks's talk page.

An Objective Re-Write is Needed[edit]

Hi there, would you be interested to re-wrtie a controversial and a highly hot topic from Finland in regards to freedom of speech and freedom of press? I tried many times but there is a war going on between the ones who just want to attack the newspaper without any sources and others who want to provide the issue from both sides. It's on Finnbay page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnbay

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:34, Monday, January 26, 2015 (UTC)

Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge


Please comment on Talk:Renault[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Renault. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Peer review of COBOL article[edit]

Hi, I've recently submitted the COBOL article for peer review and I'd really appreciate any comments you might have on it. I've not had much interaction with other editors while I've been writing it, so its probably in desperate need of copy editing and it definitely needs reviewing by someone who knows what a good article looks like. EdwardH (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jersey City, New Jersey[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jersey City, New Jersey. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Fail to understand your views[edit]

January 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Delfont. I wanted to thank you for your deletions of my your recent contributions to List of companies of the United States by state and Carpet cleaning for the reasons of "because they appeared to be promotional". I fully understand Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Although I could possibly agree in seeing a conflict with the Carpet cleaning due to the return link used to return to the main website. Though, this is an informational page with no internal links except for a " back to carpet cleaning services" (this is used to return to their website).

I do not see the difference of the provided United States recognized and Indiana Licensed Sure Clean Inc that was listed. This listing was identical except for a link. If the link is the problem, then remove the link. Here is a promotional page of wikipedia Servpro. As you notice, it has many links refering back to the promotional homepage. That is why I felt that adding a link to the homepage on List of companies of the United States by state must be acceptable. Thanks again! Delfont

There should be no companies in the List of companies of the United States by state that do not have Wikipedia articles about them. URL links should not appear there. If your company is sufficiently notable to have its own Wikipedia article like Servpro then you should start one, but it takes a lot of independent news coverage (not press releases) to gain that level of notability. Jojalozzo 04:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Manhattan[edit]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Manhattan. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Stylization of the "common name"[edit]

In January 2013 there was a "RfC on COMMONSTYLE proposal" at WT:AT in which you expressed an interest. FYI there is a similar debate taking place at the moment, see Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Stylization of the "common name" -- PBS-AWB (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Economic growth[edit]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Economic growth. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC)