User talk:Jojhutton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
News This article has been mentioned by a media organisation:


If you leave me a message here, I will answer here


NL West W L Pct. GB Home Road
Los Angeles Dodgers 89 67 0.571 40–35 49–32
San Francisco Giants 84 71 0.542 42–35 42–36
San Diego Padres 74 81 0.477 14½ 46–32 28–49
Colorado Rockies 65 91 0.417 24 45–36 20–55
Arizona Diamondbacks 63 94 0.401 26½ 32–46 31–48


Editor - platinum star I.jpg This editor is a
Master Editor
and is entitled to display this
Platinum Editor Star.
40,000+ This user has made more than 40,000 contributions to Wikipedia.
Imac 16-9.png This user contributes using an
iMac.
This user contributes using an
iPad.
Nohat-logo-XI-big-text.png This user is one of the 2000 most active Wikipedians.
Edit-find-replace.svg This user is a new page patroller.
Noia 64 apps karm.svg This user has been on Wikipedia for 6 years, 6 months and 1 day.
Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
Ddraig.svg On Ye June 2010, in the year of the 'pedia Jojhutton came 2502 on this measure of editcountitis.
US flag 13 stars – Betsy Ross.svg
This user is interested in the
History of the
United States of America
Mitlogo.svg This user is a member of the
WikiProject Baseball.

Life is grand

This editor is a Master Editor and is entitled to display this Platinum Editor Star.


List of American television programs by date


The Signpost: 20 August 2014[edit]

L.A. Meetup on September 21[edit]

The 20th Los Angeles meetup: Sunday, September 21 from 11am to 4pm

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

Join us on Sunday, September 21, from 11am to 4pm at Kramer Studio in Mid-City (map) for a meetup and edit-a-thon! Get to know the Los Angeles Wikipedia community and do some editing (or learn to edit!) in a collaborative environment. Please RSVP and consider becoming a member of the SoCal task force to help us improve articles about everything in the region.

I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

The Signpost: 27 August 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 03 September 2014[edit]

No, they will not.[edit]

The Signpost: 10 September 2014[edit]

IPhone 6C listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPhone 6C. Since you had some involvement with the IPhone 6C redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 04:57, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Controversy Over John C. Calhoun Portrait[edit]

Hello Jojhutton. Since you were the one who first proposed using Calhoun's vice-presidential portrait in the infobox on his article, I thought you'd be interested in knowing that somebody has replaced it with a Brady photograph (1849, I think), contending that photographs are "more accurate" than paintings, and that they "take precedence" over paintings. See Talk:John_C._Calhoun#Lead_image. Interestingly, the same person seems to have lost the same argument in connection with pictures of Andrew Jackson. (See link on Calhoun Talk page.) I don't have the energy to wage a campaign in defense of the painting, but perhaps you have. ;0) J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014[edit]

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Why your subst:Requested move was not working[edit]

I saw you tried to place a requested move on iPhone 6 but that the subst wasn't working for you. You had two problems with the wikitext. First since the reason you provided included an equal sign you needed to add reason= in front of that part. The second was that you had an extra open bracket at the start of one your external links( the one to touch.latimes.com ). So the fixed mark up would be something like:

{{subst:Requested move|iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus|reason=Per reliable sources since this single article covers two separate devices, but only one of the devices is mentioned in the title. Sources include, but are not limited to: [http://9to5mac.com/2014/09/22/apple-iphone-6-sales/ From 9to5 Mac], [http://news.yahoo.com/single-most-important-trick-every-iphone-6-6-135527244.html;_ylt=AwrTWf0ghyBUYHYA2SbQtDMD From Yahoo], [http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/16/tech/mobile/new-ios-8-features/index.html?iref=allsearch From CNN], [http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/23/technology/apple-sells-10-million-new-iphones-in-first-weekend.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3As%2C%7B%222%22%3A%22RI%3A13%22%7D&_r=0 The New York Times], [http://touch.latimes.com/#section/1780/article/p2p-81447203/ The LA Times], [http://blogs.wsj.com/personal-technology/2014/09/19/teardowns-of-iphone-6-and-iphone-6-plus-reveal-big-battery-difference/?KEYWORDS=iPhone+6+Plus The Wall Street Journal], [http://www.macworld.com/article/2686209/record-broken-iphone-6-iphone-6-plus-sales-top-10-million-in-opening-weekend.html MacWorld], [http://www.mercurynews.com/Business/Technology/ci_26582759/Apple:-Record-10-million-iPhones-sold-over-weekend San Jose Mercury News via The associated Press]. The ideal thing to do would be to have separate articles for each device, but that logic was rejected. So we need to do the next best thing and include the iPhone 6 Plus in the title of the article, per reliable sources.}}

Not sure if their would be much support at this point. Also note that if the article grows long enough and there is enough difference in coverage of the two variations of the iPhone 6 it is possible in the future that the article might get split again, though it is probably too soon to consider that. As an aside "iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus" sounds a bit wordy, something like the "iPhone 6 family" or "iPhone 6 series" might work better; though I personally think that just using "iPhone 6" is probably good enough for a title. Anyways hope this helps. PaleAqua (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)