User talk:Jono799

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Merwin Sibulkin concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Merwin Sibulkin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Merwin Sibulkin[edit]

Greetings, this is a good start, but to the untrained eye your References look pretty informal. Given that Sibulkin's career and impact is covered in actual serious books and journals, why not add some stronger references? I've done one for you as an example; in under 60 seconds of searching I came across mention of his "bathtub experiment" (which I honestly thought was your personal joke when I read it first) on GoogleBooks, and formatted the URL into a fully-fleshed citation using http://reftag.appspot.com

I'm pretty sure this article will eventually get approved and published, but please do yourself a solid and give it some more formal sourcing, and in footnote form rather than just listing links at the bottom. Just another hour or two of giving it stronger references will help a lot. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merwin Sibulkin (October 2)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Merwin Sibulkin concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Merwin Sibulkin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allied Quality Assurance Publications[edit]

Hello Jono799,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Allied Quality Assurance Publications for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dudel250 (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allied Quality Assurance Publications[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Allied Quality Assurance Publications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 12:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


Allied Quality Assurance Publications[edit]

Hi,

The article about which you inquire was deleted through Wikipedia's proposed deletion process. Under this process, the request of anyone -- including yourself -- is sufficient to have the article restored. I will do this shortly. The restoration which I will perform does not protect the article from further challenge. It may still be nominated by any editor for a full deletion debate, where a thorough discussion on the merits of the article can be conducted. We appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, and certainly do not wish to lose you as an editor. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

I support your position on your new page.[edit]

The person who nominated your page Allied Quality Assurance Publications has apparently reverted many of my edits and left an insubstantial message on my talk page. I do not believe that that article passes for notability reasons, however I think the summary could be a bit confusing. I would recommend you expand on that quickly and show how the article has notability. Also, I would put some articles in English on the further reading portion if possible. If another problem comes up again, I will support you. Bladeor (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014[edit]

Hi Jono. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer (Talk) 18:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC)