User talk:Juno

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Proposed deletion of Worldwide wave of action[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Worldwide wave of action has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future event, apparently called for but no evidence that anything's going to happen. WP:CRYSTAL. See [1].

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Obama-ism AFD[edit]

Thanks for your "KEEP" vote at the Obama-ism AFD. Sadly, Wikipedia still can't shake its liberal bias. The admin closed the debate early, ignored all of our arguments and assumed that this article wasn't notable because Obamaism wasn't a few years ago. --HansBarack (talk) 11:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

I count myself as one of those liberals, but its hard to argue about the bias. Hopefully people will be less sensitive after this administration is over. Its always easier to talk objectively about the past, rather than the present. Juno (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Worldwide wave of action for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worldwide wave of action is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide wave of action until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hillary Clinton's Enemies List, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Casey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll patch that up. Juno (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ready for Hillary may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[[[Category:Hillary Rodham Clinton|Presidential campaign, 2008]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 American intervention in Iraq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Worldwide wave of action for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worldwide wave of action is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide wave of action (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Your recent post at ANI[edit]

I have to suggest that your characterisation of a banned contributor/sockpuppeteer as a 'terrorist' strikes me as distinctly over the top, and unlikely to add anything to the debate but more heat - could I suggest that you revise it, and replace the word with something a little less dramatic? AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

@User:AndyTheGrump Just meant it as the turn of phrase, no drama intended. Happy to strike. Juno (talk) 03:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 American operations in Syria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In 2013, after an alleged chemical attack by the Assad Regime on its own people (the [[Ghouta chemical attack]], U.S president [[Barack Obama]] announced that Syria had crossed a "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Move requested to make room for American operations in Syria[edit]

There's a move discussion at Talk:2014_American_rescue_mission_in_Syria#Move_request_-_9_September_2014 to move 2014 American rescue mission in Syria back to original title 2014 American operations in Syria. With surveillance flights ongoing and airstrikes soon to happen there needs to be a place to put this.~Technophant (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)