Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1990 in the environment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, Juro! I reverted your edit to Structural formula; although your spelling correction was fine per se, the word concerned had recently been inserted as vandalism, contradicting the rest of the article. When making superficial improvements, please try and verify that what you’re fixing actually makes sense.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Juro2351; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for being a vandal fighter. --I dream of horses @ 04:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
John Carl Buechler
I just stumbled upon the page John Carl Buechler, and it seems you reverted an earlier blanking of the page. While I agree that simple blanking is not a sensible solution, looking over the prose I'd say this isn't an article and I wonder how any of it could even be salvaged to sensibly stubbify the article until it is expanded with proper sources and tone of writing. For that reason, imho simply restoring all the material wasn't a good call either. Just saying since you're one of two established editors to do so, rather than at least acknowledging the unacceptable text itself. --220.127.116.11 (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)