Walter Görlitz is not welcome to post here.
- 1 A barnstar for you!
- 2 Comments
- 2.1 October 2013
- 2.2 Merry Christmas!
- 2.3 OpenOffice.org
- 2.4 Speedy deletion declined: GNOME Office
- 2.5 WP:AN/EW#User:ScotXW reported by User:Czarkoff (Result: )
- 2.6 OpenOffice.org RfC
- 2.7 MDY dates in CentOS article
- 2.8 Date format in Linux articles
- 2.9 December 2014
- 2.10 Orphaned non-free image File:EPSXe 1.9.png
A barnstar for you!
|The Editor's Barnstar|
|Thanks for editing File:VLC Media Player Screenshot.png and removing unwanted information. Take care of it. 09:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ubuntu Touch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | ui = [[Unity (user interface)|Unity]])
Merry Christmas bro!!
Hi, I've opened a thread a ANI regarding the verifiability of statements on OpenOffice.org. The issue mentions the approach of David Gerard regarding to the article. However, in essence, the thread seeks to move discussion to a broader community forum, such as Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard.
Speedy deletion declined: GNOME Office
Hello KAMiKAZOW. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of GNOME Office, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Seems like a reasonable redirect, no need to delete. RfD if needed. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
WP:AN/EW#User:ScotXW reported by User:Czarkoff (Result: )
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:AN/EW#User:ScotXW reported by User:Czarkoff (Result: ). Thanks. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
KAMiKAZOW, would you mind if I asked you to move your comment inside the main RfC section? I can foresee it being ignored or discounted if it 'wasn't really part of the RfC', etc. Thanks, --Tóraí (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
MDY dates in CentOS article
Hello there! I've just CentOS article – so, please allow me to explain it a bit further. Manual of Style does say that existing date formats should be kept as-is, but before I came to edit that article, ISO dates prevailed and to DMY dates about a year ago. Thus, I see no problems about moving this time to MDY dates, which, FWIW, I find to be much more readable. Of course, I'm more than open to discussing this further. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 23:53, 30 October 2014 (UTC)the date formatting edits, re-establishing MDY dates in
- So the DMY format is established since a year and you're hardly the only editor since then. I don't see how your change of mind a whole year later is in conformance with MOS. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 02:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I've seen at least a dozen of other articles switched to MDY or DMY dates, and hardly anyone complained. Also, CentOS could be considered to have a close national tie with the US, especially after Red Hat employed its main developers and took over the trademarks. :) Though, if you insist, I'm open to bringing back the DMY dates. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 02:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- “if you insist, I'm open to bringing back the DMY dates”
- That sounds as if you were in a position to negotiate that. You yourself established the DMY format a year ago, as you wrote yourself. As such the format rule applies and that transfer of the trademark to a company that has development offices in the Czech Republic and elsewhere around the globe does not change that. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Date format in Linux articles
Hello! Any chances, please, for you to have a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software § Date format in release history sections of Linux articles and possibly comment there by providing your point of view? The whole thing is pretty much poorly discussed with only a few editors actually discussing it, while it seems to be affecting more than a few articles (and the date format seems to be extending beyond the tables into references, please see history of the Linux distribution article). Any contributions to the discussion would be highly appreciated! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 02:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- com/2014/10/calligra-gemini-now-also-for-linux.html|title=Calligra Gemini – now also for Linux :)|publisher=}}</ref> On 28 August 2014 the first snapshot of Calligra Gemini was released by KO GmbH
Orphaned non-free image File:EPSXe 1.9.png
Thanks for uploading File:EPSXe 1.9.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).