User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 3

Twinkle[edit]

Yes, its a pretty useful tool. Thanks for mentioning about this tool to me. :) Ssven2 (talk)

Bhishek[edit]

Definitely i will look into the matters. I believe that User:Murrallli's contributions will surely help us as it was also a sock puppet of Padma. That puppet's contributions, if matched with Bhishek's, will prove the latter as a sock puppet i believe. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pavan, great news: Bhishek has been found guilty of being a sockpuppet of Padmalakshmi, and so is user Pushpakan. A pity that he never refrains from sockpuppetry. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well now another puppet. Padma is like a soul that never gets redeemed. It continues to haunt every one in any other possible way. It was Murralli, Pushpakan and now Bhishek. What's next? But this user continues to edit even now as i see. Is the user blocked? If yes please let me know and also show me how this user has been found guilty? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet, but some admin performed WP:CheckUser and found him guilty, and will block him soon. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Well, can you copy edit this page if any section requires such. I am working on it but i am unable to decide whether this one requires a copy edit. Please help me. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. Bhishek, along with Pushpakan and half-dozen socks were blocked indefinitely. A great relief temporarily. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But the freak has always "evaded" his punishment by creating new accounts. We can only hope this is the last. But I wish that repeated sockpuppetry should soon mean legal prosecution (just like how a woman was arrested for repeatedly stalking her ex-boyfriend over FB). Kailash29792 (talk) 11:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Like i said before, this freak is like an irredeemable soul (provided you are not an atheist) which has no peace of mind till returning here in any other name. The way this user edited Telugu film-related articles made me feel that TRPoD (the one i hate immensely) is 1000 times better. So, this i hope should be the last one. Legal prosecution is indeed required but i don't think so that it would be possible like how it happened in FB. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars[edit]

Helped you put your recent barnstars on your user page. :) Ssven2 (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chandramukhi GA review[edit]

The article has been taken up for reviewing by AmritasyaPutra. Ssven2 (talk) 07:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magadheera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kaminey[edit]

Hello Kailash. I saw you made some edits to this recently, some of which seemed to be in accordance to my GA review for the article. Since nominator Prashant hasn't been active for a few days and previously failed to get this up to GA back in August 2013, maybe you'd like to assist him this time around. The review is on hold until November 22nd. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]