User talk:Kendrick7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This editor is a Most Perfect Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain and Cigarette Burn.



March of the prostitutes[edit]

Just saw your new article. Can't give you a specific timeframe, but the Grand Rapids Michigan police did something similar about 15 years ago. Just prior to a national church convention, they rounded up all the hookers, arraigned them on whatever pretense the busted them on,put them on a bus and released them on their own recognizance in Alpena, 250 miles away. For what it's worth. :) John from Idegon (talk) 06:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Al-Arab News Channel[edit]

Hi Kendrick, glad you liked my edit :). I've started a discussion on a different edit at Talk:Al-Arab_News_Channel. Boud (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roswell Lee Evans[edit]

Hello, Kendrick7. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Roswell Lee Evans, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arbustum (talk) 18:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glossip v. Gross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cruel and unusual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Roger Ver for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Ver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Ver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tenaqzn'f Fbvyrq Gubat (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


Information icon Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Information.svg Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. - Happysailor (Talk) 16:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

You're right, I dun screwed up. And despite your templated advice, I've replied on your talk page anyway :) -- Kendrick7talk 01:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 06:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)