Welcome to my talk page! Here are the Archives of my talk page: /Archive 1 Please start new topics below with a new section.
You oughta read Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun_control#Discretionary_sanctions and the rest of it. They don't put up with battleground editing anymore. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
|Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
I appreciate your coordinated heads up
- I'm not going to template you, because you've been around longer than I have. But all the more reason that you shouldn't be edit-warring at MastCell Talk 10:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC) . A number of people have expressed concerns about your graphic on the talkpage; I count 4 people with concerns about it, and only you defending its inclusion. In that setting, you should be working through the concerns on the talkpage, not edit-warring to restore the graphic.