User talk:KingMorpheus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, KingMorpheus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig2.png or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! TJ Spyke 22:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Contents

Deep South Wrestling title[edit]

If you want the page moved, make a request at WP:RM. Just turning the page into a redirect is a no-no since it ruins the edit history of the page (which is not allowed at WP). TJ Spyke 22:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Major Brothers[edit]

Here is an explanation of why I reverted your edit: Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Avoid the definite article ("the") and the indefinite article ("a"/"an") at the beginning of the page name. TJ Spyke 03:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:TheMajorsBrothers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheMajorsBrothers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Jesse Dalton[edit]

Pages have to be moved by administrators to preserve the edit history for copyright purposes, rather than moved manually. Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves. McPhail 22:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Tony Braddock[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tony Braddock, by Mschel, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tony Braddock is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tony Braddock, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Tony Braddock itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Links[edit]

I appreciate that you're trying to help out at the Days of our Lives articles, but it seems that there are fair number of move wars going on. Since these moves are controversial, could you please be sure to check consensus for a move at the article's talkpage, before moving it? Other procedures for controversial moves can be seen at WP:RM, thanks. --Elonka 20:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Blanking of Ory DiMera[edit]

Information.svg Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ory DiMera. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Jason Morgan[edit]

You just cant completely uncited info about a character. Corpx 01:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Chief Mojo Risin[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Chief Mojo Risin, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Chief Mojo Risin fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

verging on nonsense. AFAIK, no actual connection to article it redirects to. Prob OR.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Chief Mojo Risin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Wes Novak[edit]

  • Hey, KingMorpheus, I like that you moved Wes Novak to Wes (AMC), since that has merged those two articles together...which were of the same character, but since he does have a last name and there's no other article on Wikipedia of the name Wes Novak, except this one, this article should definitely be titled Wes Novak (and without the title of AMC next to his name). I just wanted to let you know that I'm about to move that article to Wes Novak. See you around. Flyer22 21:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm back to state that I'm not even sure that his last name is Novak, but it had to have been reported as Novak for an editor here at Wikipedia to have created an article titled Wes Novak, unless that editor was just joking around, which I don't believe was the case there. I'm going to wait until I know that his last name is Novak for sure before I move that article to Wes Novak. His last name could have been originally reported as Novak, but then changed...or the source that reported his last name as Novak got it wrong. Anyway, we'll see. Flyer22 21:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Well, we finally know now that Wes is not to be called Wes Novak. And, in case you didn't already know, though you would have come across it eventually, the article Richie Novak, the one who is actually Annie Lavery's brother, has been created. I'll see you around, KingMorpheus. Flyer22 08:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Wait, now it turns out that Wes is actually Richie Novak. Whoa. I mean, then I wonder who the guy is that's been following Annie for a little while since he held up Babe at The Comeback. I just read Richie Novak's updated article and either I missed the more important parts of last week's episodes of All My Children or those are spoilers in his article at this moment. Flyer22 16:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I know that spoilers don't count on Wikipedia. So are you saying that Wes really isn't Richie, or that we can't say that he's Richie yet? I see that you've fixed that article quickly, of course, to change mention of Richie being Wes. Thanks for the heads-up on that matter. Was that just mis-information, or, as I asked before, just a spoiler? Flyer22 17:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
All cleared up. Flyer22 19:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Here. Flyer22 20:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Theresa Crane[edit]

Hello KingMorpheus, I just wanted to tell you, I plan to change Theresa Winthrop back to Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald Crane. Due to the fact that Alistair Crane is still alive, Theresa's marriages to Ethan Winthrop as well as Jared Casey are invalid. This means she never legally carried the last name Winthrop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBanks (talkcontribs) 13:53, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

WWE[edit]

WWE has been calling it the "ECW Championship" for a couple of months, I think it's safe to say that is the new name of the title. Would would mind changing it back please? TJ Spyke 01:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:StandStill.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:StandStill.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image[edit]

Why did you upload this image? Picaroon (t) 00:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

A more important question is why did you create the sockpuppet account BatWave (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) and use it to vandalize other articles with the image? Thatcher131 03:30, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
I did no such thing, I uploaded the image 'cause I thought it meant something--KingMorpheus 23:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, m:Checkuser determined that you are the same as BatWave. In any case, unless you took the girlie pic and have a signed model release, putting it here was a no-no. Thatcher131 02:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted images on userboxes[edit]

Information icon.svg A non-free image was recently removed from one or more of your userboxes. Please be advised that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Wikipedia policy does not allow templates (which includes userboxes) or user pages to contain any copyrighted content not under a free license; so, for example, claims under "fair use" are explicitly rejected. This clause is to be interpreted strictly and without exception, for legal reasons. You can research Wikipedia's non-free content policy for more details.

I hope this does not discourage you from creating more userboxes; your contributions to Wikipedia are greatly appreciated. For images and other media that are freely available for use in userpages and userboxes, check out Wikimedia Commons. Thank you.

An additional note, I'm referring to User:Jw2034/stone roses2. The album image can only be used in articles since it's copyrighted. It's a drag, I know, but its policy. If you have any questions or suggestions, send me a message in my talk page. Thanks. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 11:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

TNA Women's World Championship[edit]

The rightful title of TNA's new Women's division title is TNA Women's World Championship, per this article on TNAWrestling.com. What are you seeing that contradicts that?«»bd(talk stalk) 23:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Green/Generico[edit]

No, what makes them notable as a team? There is a reason that every WWE tag team doesn't have an article (and WWE is like Major League Baseball, ROH and PWG minor league baseball). Since I don't watch ROH or PWG (since I don't want to spend money on their DVDs just to see, if they were on TV in the US I would at least check them out) I can't be sure of their notability. TJ Spyke 23:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


Image source problem with Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

No Remorse Corps[edit]

A tag has been placed on No Remorse Corps, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how No Remorse Corps is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:No Remorse Corps saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. One Night In Hackney303 00:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. One Night In Hackney303 00:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nikki311 21:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Removing verifiable content[edit]

Soap show pages have a Coming and Going section. When it is published in a recognized publication that an actor is leaving and then posted under "Comings and Going" DO NOT REMOVE THAT INFORMATION. Your repeated removal of verifiable content could be considered vandalism. Repeated offenses will be reported.IrishLass0128 17:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:WWECHAMPHHH.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:La's .jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:La's .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ClassicJohnSquire.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:La's .jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:La's .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Velvet Sky[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jamie Szantyr. Since you are interested in recreating Velvet Sky, you might want to participate in the Jamie Szantyr deletion review. -- Jreferee t/c 23:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello KingMorpheus. An editor is objecting to a cross-namespace redirect you created pointing to User:ThisDude62/sandbox. Sandbox articles are intended for development, not publication. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross-space link problem for the discussion. You are welcome to add your own comment there. EdJohnston 05:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Moving pages and why you don't do it[edit]

Regarding your moving of Belle Black, which has been moved back and protected from moves, here is why it is not done: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). There's a whole explanation there as to why we don't willy nilly move pages just because a character gets married. If you have any questions, feel free to ask, I have other discussions I can also direct you to. CelticGreen (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Jamie Szantyr (wrestler)[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jamie Szantyr (wrestler), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: User:ThisDude62/sandbox. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamie Szantyr (wrestler)[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Jamie Szantyr (wrestler), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SmashvilleBONK! 05:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Don't tell another editor who is correct, a new character is not notable, to "back off." I'll gladly put the article up for deletion. A character takes years to be notable. I can very easily put the Claudia article up for deletion and get it. There are many editors who would agree a character of 2 days with no background would be an easy delete. KellyAna (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Unnotable characters[edit]

I realize you put a lot of time in writing these characters of this teenage soap opera. But they are not within the guidelines for WP:NOTABILITY. See also WP:NOT. Also, they are already included in the parent article The Best Years. I will not put them up for deletion, however, don't be surprised if someone else does...and succeeds. If you need any help on anything, don't hesitate to ask. Happy editing!--Sallicio\color{Red} \oplus 08:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

PS, just as a sidenote, this IP address, 72.229.214.90 might be construed as a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet. If it is not then disregard.--Sallicio\color{Red} \oplus 08:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

It's Wells[edit]

[1] Don't know what "credits" you are looking at but the NBC site has now and always said "Wells" and WP:Common names policy is also on the side of it stays EJ Wells. Do not move the page again as it goes against policy and NBC's own site. KellyAna (talk) 05:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

It's here [2] and here [3] as Wells too. Just in case there's any doubt. KellyAna (talk) 05:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text message killer[edit]

I agree with you, but there's an AC injunction in place that means that you can't (unfortunately) redirect the article just yet :/ Will (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Your article?[edit]

Uh, you're welcome, I guess, but it's not your article more than anyone else's. If anything, it's mine (but it's not). This is a wiki. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 07:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

That's an extremely childish way of looking at it, and, yeah, just plain wrong. Perhaps you're unfamiliar with WP:OWN and WP:COPY. I'll retract what I said earlier. The article's not "mine" at all. It's no one's. Again, this is a wiki. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 07:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Whatever. I don't care. Sarcasm is impossible to detect on the internet anyway. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 07:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 07:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Removal of prod notices[edit]

You have removed PROD notices from articles including Pussycat Dolls' second studio album with only WP:IAR as justification. I think you are abusing this rule: removal of a PROD notice should be justified and you have ignored that rule by using another which must also be justified. See WP:WIARM#What "Ignore all rules" does not mean and especially:

  • A rule-ignorer must justify how their actions improve the encyclopedia if challenged.

So please tell: how does keeping an article which fails Wikipedia policies WP:CRYSTAL and WP:V improve the encyclopedia?

Ros0709 (talk) 08:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Shannon Moore[edit]

Hi, can I please ask you to explain this edit? I don't understand why you removed the move names when they are source with a reliable source. Also, I changed you edit of WWE roster to WWE superstars back, because the template is called Template: WWE roster. Thanks, ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 08:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, ok. It was my understanding that OWOW is a reliable source, btu maybe not for move names. Well, that's grand then. Thanks for explaining, ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 12:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
PS, thanks for signing my autograph book! ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 12:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Sure thing. It's really quite simple. Just go to the members list and add your name. I would also advise you to add your name to the active members list. After that, you just edit away, maybe join in some discussions at the project talk page or help out with our PPV expansion project. I know you haven't actually joined yet, but let me be the first to say welcome to the team!NiciVampireHeart♥ 23:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Why not? I'll add ya to my section! ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 23:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


Your Page[edit]

KingMorpheus, I like how you did your page. Can you tell me how to set my page up like that? -- The King Gemini (talk) 04:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks The King Gemini (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Howdy![edit]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 21:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)


Help[edit]

jus wondering if you could help me with some things like making my page more betta cuz i was wondering how u got those things on your page like this user is a music composer and stuff like that --KCDavis (talk) 19:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Devil Thunderbolt

Thank You KCDavis (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Creating A Userbox[edit]

How do you create a userbox? I've been trying create some. —Preceding unsigned comment added by King Gemini (talkcontribs) 22:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 17:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Re: Question[edit]

I'm afraid I don't. I don't watch TNA. Sorry. ;( ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 06:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 17:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Yaya vs. YaYa[edit]

I'm unclear why you moved the article to YaYa DaCosta. All of the sources I've been able to find do not capitalize the second "y". AniMate 23:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes it matters. Life and death? No, but according to ABC you are inaccurate. AniMate 00:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Hayley Williams[edit]

You're edits to this article are becoming disruptive. The article was merged according to the guidelines because it has considerable overlap with an existing article (Paramore). Remember wikipedia does not need an article on everything and everyone. There is no reason for an article that is basicaly copied and pasted text from another and is attempting to attribute Paramore to her personally. The only thing in the article that is actually about is her name and birth date. The rest is about the band and already exiswts in the band article. It has been discussed before and there is still no assertion of notability. --neonwhite user page talk 23:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Nobody 'deserves' an article. It is entirely based on the notability guidelines at WP:MUSIC. There are lots of article about non-notable subjects on wikipedia but that is not a valid reason for creating another. The Lacey Mosley is a poor article full of irrelevant WP:FANCRUFT that needs looking at. No content is being deleted here, it was just being merged into another article for easy of use. It shouldn't even be an issue. A better use of time would be to improve the 'members' section in the Paramore article. Then if they get too long it may need seperating. At the moment i can;t see any info that cannot go on the paramore page. --neonwhite user page talk 23:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

← [[../Issue 014|Issue 014]] |
Issue 015
| [[../Issue 016|Issue 016]] →
Delivered: 16:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

La Familia[edit]

It's no problem. ;) ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 12:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 14:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 19:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 20:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Common names[edit]

Are you aware of Wikipedia's Common name policy? It's the reason that when a woman or fictional character gets married to a man, that does not mean that her article should be changed to her married name. Why? Because she is most well-known by her maiden name or whatever name she had been significantly using before she got married. The same applies to men or fictional male characters who suddenly change their names. Lucas should be at Lucas Roberts, not Lucas Horton. EJ should be at EJ Wells, not EJ DiMera. This is why I have returned these articles to these names. Not only is it Wikipedia policy, but it makes more sense for their articles to be titled by their well-known names rather than their new names, especially since most eventually go by their well-known names again anyway. Flyer22 (talk) 03:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 17:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

RE[edit]

What are you talking about "WWE tag straps"?--UnquestionableTruth-- 02:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 18:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 16:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 15:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Red Links[edit]

Why do you keep removing Red links from the GH cast list? --OLTL2002 (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Because they encourage new articles. If there is a red link for a certain non-existing article, it will automatically become a link if an article is created. You can read the link that I posted for 'red links', but in the meantime, leave them be. Thank you. --OLTL2002 (talk) 01:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Ben Davidson[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people), qualifiers like "Dr." are not used in article names. Plus, it is standard practice in fictional articles to denote series, film or book/comic for any necessary disambiguation. — TAnthonyTalk 00:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Beth Phoenix[edit]

Why do you keep removing Glam Slam? It's been used numerous times on Raw and I cited a source for it. You then reverted with an edit summary that cited two WrestleZone articles that have nothing to do with Beth. Per WP:PW/MOS#Sources, 411Mania is more reliable than WrestleZone. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

I could search Youtube later if I have time. But let me ask you this, if there's a source, why does it really matter? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
WON (as well as SLAM and PWTorch) pass the requirements of WP:RS. Regardless of your opinion of them, they passed. 411Mania is debatable however. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of La Familia (professional wrestling)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated La Familia (professional wrestling), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Familia (professional wrestling). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- iMatthew T.C. 15:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 22:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 15:43, 31 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 14:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 19:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 17:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 20:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

I'm back![edit]

It's been MONTHS since you posted on my talk page, Free Dixiercat!....well my block was temporary but after that, I had trouble with wikipedia...I could log in, but I couldn't make it past 1 page before the internet went all screwy...But I'm back! And I'm back (almost) full force! I plan to abide by wiki rules as much as I can and the person(s) who had a problem with my articles back in February has been revealed to be a sock puppet... Peace out!

Dixiercat (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 14:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

CfD nomination of Category:Dirty Sexy Money characters[edit]

I have nominated Category:Dirty Sexy Money characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Priceless (professional wrestling)[edit]

Please do not restore this article. It is a short article that has information that can easily fit into the individual member's pages. There is no need to make a separate page...if every tag team had a page there would be a million more article on Wikipedia. WP:N states that it can be a stand alone article if there is reliable third party sources that mention them as a group. If you can add that, then the page can stay. If you can't, the page should remain a redirect. Nikki311 03:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 17:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 10:28, 21 December 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 00:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Archive[edit]

Your talk page is over 300K, you should consider archiving it. I suggest getting a bot to automatically do it. TJ Spyke 20:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Ted DiBiase and Cody Rhodes[edit]

Consensus at WT:PW is that the team is still not notable enough to warrant a separate article apart from the individual member's articles. Please stop recreating the article without trying to get consensus that the team is notable enough. You may start a discussion at WT:PW if you like. Nikki311 03:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I said that third party reliable sites would help the article prove that it satisfies WP:N. The article you created has none. Like I said, bring it up at WT:PW if you think you have an argument. Nikki311 03:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
If you continue to recreate the page, I am going to protect it from editing. You are being disruptive by going against established consensus that you've been told about multiple times by multiple people. If you want to try and create new consensus then fine, but you can't go against what has already been decided. Nikki311 03:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Well the link you provided on my talk page [4] has NiciVampireHeart and WrestlingLover saying the same thing in edit summaries. Nikki311 03:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Sir, all I see is you. --KingMorpheus (talk) 03:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 17:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Scott Levy[edit]

What's the deal with this edit?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Levy&diff=281446917&oldid=280215512

You remove Online World of Wrestling sources in favor of it's older version, Obsessed with Wrestling. I also can't undo the edit for whatever reason, so I'll have to go back in and re-add the source manually unless you can give me a good reason for your reversion. Thanks, Gavyn Sykes (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I reverted, because someone removed relevant data about Raven's DDT (Even Flow/Raven Effect) didn't see it, whoops.--KingMorpheus (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]