User talk:KirtZJ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please use the New section tab above to start a new message. Thanks for stopping by.

—KirtZMessage

Contents

Napsman[edit]

...I presume? Always good to see another one of us here. Let me know if there's anything I can help you with. Guettarda (talk) 04:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Ingress[edit]

Revised that screenie, feel free to drop it in as appropriate. Also a comment on one aspect of edits over on the talk page thereTim Bray (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Accel World[edit]

Hello. I see you're working on Accel World. Just want to tell you something. There has been (rough) consensus for some time now to phase out terminology sections (see this, this and this for relevant discussions). Since you seem to be rather knowledgeable about the series, can you somehow merge the contents of the terminology section into the Plot section, or alternatively, to re-work it into a setting section? That would eliminate excessive fancruft in the article and remove any undue weight for in-universe information. For an example of how this was done, see Shakugan no Shana (it reached GA status after the terminology section was phased out). Maybe you can do the same for Puella Magi Madoka Magica and A Certain Magical Index? The articles can't fulfill their full potential (reaching B or GA-class) until their terminology sections are phased out. Thank you and happy editing! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

I had no idea that there was such discussions on the fate of terminology sections, although I had already planned on rewriting most of the Accel World and Guilty Crown articles where this problem is present and bring them up to B-Class for the time being at least as well the ones tied to them, such as their Anime and Character counterparts. It seems to me that amateur Wikipedians throw information into these articles without the knowledge of fancruft. For the time being I have reordered some of the text of Accel World so that I won't be confused about where the information goes and how it should be used when rewriting, the same goes for Guilty Crown. I must also point out that the plots for both are utterly horrendous and some of the information regarding usage of fictional devices is either inappropriate or wrong. For now I'm focusing on these two and have taken everyone's suggestions into consideration from the talk page discussions you referred to although, with the complexity of the plots behind both, pace will be slow but ongoing. ーKirtZJTalk 01:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Signature[edit]

You still need to provide a link to your userpage in your signature. It is not allowed to be plaintext.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Let me join in saying that it would be more collegial for you to have that link so that it is easier for other users to contact you should it be necessary. People can still find you without the link, but it takes extra effort, and that may make people feel put off. Jehochman Talk 18:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out to the both of you. I never actually noticed since I always use the four tildes at the end of a post, since I knew having my UserName visible is policy. ーKirtZJTalk 03:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Karneval[edit]

I believe the {{for}} is most definitely needed. From 2005 until recently, Karneval was a redirect to the German version of Carnival, with the manga being the article Karneval (manga). I'll agree that without that long-standing redirect, the hatnote would not be needed, but because if it, I think it is. Carolina wren (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Attack on Titan[edit]

Hi KirtZJ, the 'List of Attack on Titan episodes' page still has some grammatical issues, and please, allow me to change "loosing" to "losing". The other sentence I edited was previously the following: "Meanwhile, with the evacuation of the citizens completed, Jean, Armin, Sasha and several other soldiers run low on fuel for their maneuvering gears and hence, are unable to escape from the battlefield, while subsequently loosing their morale." This needs to be fixed, my suggestion was "Meanwhile, with the evacuation of the citizens completed, Jean, Armin, Sasha and several other soldiers run low on fuel for their maneuvering gears and subsequently lose morale as they are unable to escape from the battlefield." Could you explain what the issue is, I don't see an issue with tense. Thanks, Andy saigo. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Attack_on_Titan_episodes&diff=555871462&oldid=555871022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy saigo (talkcontribs) 01:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

The irregularity of that sentence would be that the tense wouldn't be right with the changes you propose. The present participle is usually the correct form used in summarizing episodic content on Wikipedia. That's really all there is too it. If you made that change, the entire article would need to be restructured to keep consistency, but again, the tense used would be wrong. "..subsequently lose morale.." is present tense while the adjoining part "..as they are unable to escape.." is the present participle. It doesn't match. Sorry if this seems a bit harsh. Also, HigherFive made the grammatical changes, upon looking at the history.
Also, sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes. Welcome to Wikipedia! ーKirtZJTalk 01:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Ingress tagging[edit]

You recently dropped in: cleanup|reason=Reads more like a guide book than an encyclopedic article.|date=May 2013

I went through and trimmed a bunch of superfluous fluff. Have a look? If you still think the tag is warranted, maybe identify something that you think has a more appropriate level of detail? Tim Bray (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I dropped those in because there is clearly too much detail, such as shown by all of the tables. Remember, Ingress is still a mobile game and not a dynamic mainstream game such as those for home consoles. An example of an initial mobile gaming article would be the Angry Birds (video game). Notice how it has achieved Good Article status since it is mostly prose. So until Ingress can reach some level near this, it doesn't even have to be Good, but something more encyclopedic like Angry Birds, I think the tags should remain.
An example of how to do this would be to convert some if not all the tables to a prose form and use only one or two variables as examples of achieving them such as Portal requirements etc, we really don't need to know all the power levels, just a basic few to give readers the general grasp. I'll leave the article up to you since you seem to be more knowledgable on Ingress than I am. I'd rather people know that Wikipedia isn't a guide book or walkthrough, if you catch my drift. As always, Happy Editing! ーKirtZJTalk 21:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Um, did you look? I took out all the tables except for the leveling-up points. Anyhow, I’ll keep trimming and eventually kill the tags when I think it’s clean enough Tim Bray (talk) 22:19, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I did but I still don't feel the Gameplay section should have so many so sub-sections. If you could merge most of them into a prose form like the Angry Birds article I mentioned that might about do it. KirtZJTalk 23:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

List of My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU episodes[edit]

Your revert doesn't explain why it should be used over my summary. You use WP:PLOTSUM which doesn't back up your arguments. The current summary is overly detailed for such a simple anime. You used List of Attack on Titan episodes as an example, but ignoring Wikipedia:Other stuff exists, I'll throw List of Buso Renkin episodes and List of Code Geass: Lelouch of the Rebellion episodes back. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 20:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

As par your last edit, you said " 11:01, 2 June 2013‎ DragonZero (talk | contribs)‎ . . (21,002 bytes) (-725)‎ . . (→‎Episode list: Episode 1 now under 1000 words." When my summaries were already way under your assumed limit, averaging almost 280 words, as I made a point of mentioning in the edit. By also giving reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_write_a_plot_summary#Putting_it_all_together , that specific summary on the Red Hiding Hood was to show you that it is about the same length as my summaries. What say you?
The anime isn't as simple as you think it is. It's based of off social Psycology which I understand pretty well. How about if I reduce my summaries by a further 2 to 3 lines? Also, use of the words "Misanthropy" and "conscript" are misused in your first summary. Hachiman isn't a misanthropic character, and he was basically forced by Shizuka to join the Service Club as a result of his pragmatic ideal, not conscripted.
I'd rather be precise than have readers assume a less than accurate summary. So again, If i reduce my summaries by 2-3 lines will that be alright with you? I had already started on a major-copy editing of that article if you check the article's history. So listen, I'm not trying to start anything here with logic, because that'll get us no where. I hope you'll take my good faith reasoning into account, since you are obviously more experienced editing on here than me. ーKirtZJTalk 20:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Misanthropy was what I saw from his behavior. I thought conscript could be used instead of forcefully recruited. I also meant less than 1000 characters. I only plan on editing the first episode to show the kind of concision that should be aimed for. There are too many ignorable events in the other summaries. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 21:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
That's okay, I just wanted to let you know that I actually meant no kind of harm by my summaries since I felt kind of antagonized by your reverts, after I had already started working on them. Maybe you should have specified 1000 characters from the start, so I wouldn't misunderstand. I'll go ahead and work on reducing the content.
Misanthropy by wikipedia's definition "..is the general hatred, mistrust or disdain of the human species or human nature." is a bit strong to describe Hachiman. He clearly doesn't hate people, simply a loner. If he did hate people that much he wouldn't help them as he goes out of his way to do in the first place; or he would have to be classed as some type of villain by nature such as the character Iago from Shakespeare's Othello. So I'll try to neaten up the first summary as well, again for a little condensed precision. Anyway, Happy Editing. I'll look forward to your guidance in the future DragonZero-senpai. ーKirtZJTalk 21:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, KirtZJ. You have new messages at HigherFive's talk page.
Message added 22:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HigherFive | 〉 22:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

External wikis[edit]

Are to be avoided in 99.99% of the cases, per WP:ELNO. I think there even is a bot reverting any additions of links to *.wikia.com too. ー HigherFive | 〉 01:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, I'll keep a lookout for more of those. <KirtZJ>Talk 01:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, KirtZJ. You have new messages at Soetermans's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply[edit]

Okay, fair enough. Delta Wings (talk) 23:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Oreshura[edit]

Are you fine with simply 'Despite this, he eventually fell in love with Masuzu" and 'She eventually fell in love with Eita without actually realizing"? Delta Wings (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

That should be fine, although it would be better if you could write it from the LN perspective (if you read them) as I suggested. See how it's done in the Oreimo article. <KirtZJ>Talk 23:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

The devil is a part timer[edit]

In our discussion on Talk:The Devil Is a Part-Timer! (before it was deleted), you twice suggested that I read the light novels which form the basis for the manga and the anime. I cannot read Japanese and I am not aware of anyway to obtain the light novels in English. Do you have a suggestion of how to do that? JRSpriggs (talk) 07:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Dragon Ball#DBZ creation[edit]

Do you want to try being involved in that discussion? A new and different insight might bring progress there, since the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga already tried. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I didn't feel like leaving this unanswered. I don't know much about DBZ to have made much of a difference here. <KirtZJ>Talk 16:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, KirtZJ. You have new messages at HigherFive's talk page.
Message added 17:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HigherFive | 〉 17:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

The Devil Is a Part-Timer!'s ED[edit]

Can you clarify what you mean by "CD track lists it as "Tsuki Hana"? When I checked before I was unable to verify the pronunciation. ー HigherFive | 〉 20:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

The "Sankaku" e.p. released by Nano Ripe on 22/05/13 lists the romaji as "Tsuki Hana", although the kanji, "月花" translates as "May Flowers" using Google. Not sure if this was intentional or not, but I thought it might have been best to go with the aforementioned. <KirtZJ>Talk 20:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
No, I'm aware that the song was released in the Sankaku EP. I was saying that I didn't find any romaji in any reliable place. That is, not in the EP's booklet, nor on nano.Ripe's offical site or members' blogs, or a retailer.
Google Translate's is a mistranslation, since 月花 is a made-up word. ー HigherFive | 〉 22:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I figured as much. I'll leave it up to you then. <KirtZJ>Talk 22:21, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Very well. I'll change it back to "Gekka". It's probably that since it's not explicitly specified. ー HigherFive | 〉 22:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Persona 4[edit]

Good article status states a view must be neutral, with giving due weights to each side

The receptive section is already neutral, you are the one constantly tipping the balance with your disruptive edits. This is the consensus shown by all those who have reverted your edits. <KirtZJ>Talk 21:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
neutral? atlus has stated his sexual orientation is ambigious, in the entire preceding paragraph suggests kanji is in fact gay, that is an opinion, because there is no concrete evidence as such, if you wish to put a parapgraph in favor of this, there must be another section detailing the neutrality of the accucation, therefore giving fair weight to each side. Either give due weight to each side, or remove the section all together. That is the standard of Wikipedia good article criteria. You cannot remove a section because you don't agree with it
You said it yourself; Atlus stated officially that it was ambiguous hence the neutrality. You're making a non existant case based on opinions and ignoring Atlus' official statement which you yourself quoted above. There's nothing here to debate. T You're trying to make something out of nothing. The consensus by all those who reverted your edits is that it is irrelevant. <KirtZJ>Talk 21:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Ive only included that secion because that paragraph, AGAIN, suggests that he is gay, which in fact is left ambigious. The fair thing would be to delete the whole secion, but because you have no intention of that, I have no choice but to include information to repute that claim and make it neutral
again, wikipeda good article standards state a view must be Neutral. even without my edit, atlus has stated that is ambigious, but the entire paragraph suggests otherwise, and its contriditary to suggest he is gay and then go on to state his sexual orientation is ambigious
The paragraph to which you are referring is citing a neutral undertone, they are neither confirming nor denying anything. How you fail to see this is beyond me. <KirtZJ>Talk 21:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
this is the one that gets me ""homosexuals could certainly take issue with the manner in which they are represented".citing that kanji is breaking the boundries for the typical stereotypical gay man
also "comment on homosexuality in a greater Japanese social context," in which "the notion of 'coming out' is seen as undesirable ... as it necessarily involves adopting a confrontational stance against mainstream lifestyles and values. this is irrelevant to kanji and to persona 4
also this is irrelevant and off topic to our current conversation, but does there really need to be any information on his sexual orientation? it seems kinda irrelevant to me..
That is exactly the problem here, reading bits instead of reading the section as a whole. If you did this you would get the neutral undertone. Anyway, I'm not going to debate further.
Also what would you do then? Remove Kanji's sexual orientation altogether like you did in the past? I will not endorse this. Lastly I would appreciate if you sign your posts on my talk page with 4 tildes after you have finished writing a point. <KirtZJ>Talk 22:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
if you don't wish to debate anymore ill leave your page and let you be. Ill be open to debate on the main persona 4 article page if you ever wish to continue. Thank you for your time
Sure thing. Happy Editing. (But make sure they are constructive) <KirtZJ>Talk 22:46, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

I saw your improvement to the structure of List of Danganronpa: The Animation episodes, looks good. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 21:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Wonchop made the switch; I neatened up the lead, there wasn't all that much information to begin with since the article is still young. KirtZJTalk02:20, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

VE[edit]

Thanks for the links. Further proof that VE is the cancer that is killing Wikipedia.-- 02:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Sure no problem. I'll start making a list of the articles as well; the VE devs must have no doubt been informed of the errors by now, since its really becoming something of an annoyance to fix every time. KirtZJTalk 20:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Persona 4 question?[edit]

What is that last sentence implying , if you don't mind me asking, "homosexuals could e certainly take manner in which they are represented? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loominginterval (talkcontribs) 22:09, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Its not implying anything; its quite blunt and straightforward, however please remember that line is only there for documentation purposes. This isn't the first time someone has had an issue with this topic on the P4 article. KirtZJTalk 22:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

External links[edit]

Also simply linking reviews to the EL is not what I have seen on WP:Anime and Manga articles

The Anime & Manga wikiproject is essentially defunct because all the content-producing editors have been driven away by increasingly narrow interpretations and deletionism; what you've seen is not in anyway what ought to be, but mere remnants. What, exactly, would you prefer people to do if not link to reviews? Link them on the talk page? This is utterly futile, as <5% of hand-selected highly relevant links will ever be actually added to articles: it is be linked in EL or not appear at all.

The question is, is it better for a lengthy insightful review for an RS to be linked, or not included at all? Given the moribund editing community, I'm afraid it is simply not a realistic option to demand that each review be carefully parsed and integrated into a Reception section.

Finally, I will again point you at WP:EL, which encourages use of ELs in the body of the article in some fashion but acknowledges that in the absence of infinite editor supply, this will not always happen and that putting RSs into a EL or Further Reading section is perfectly acceptable... --Gwern (contribs) 01:54 28 July 2013 (GMT)

That edit was more than a week ago and you came to bite my head off on my own talk page?. Clearly you took offense from the sentiment in my edit summary and I apologize for it. As for linking reviews...I would imagine that is precisely why a Reception section is included and it doesn't take more than two minutes to scan a review and write one or two lines on it, as shown by my edit. Also, let me explain something that goes far beyond a simple two-lined minor edit on which you have tread upon. I am a part of Wiki-Project Anime and Manga and I am thoroughly offended by you calling it "defunct." (You might probably stop reading around here) The regular editors that are on the project work their best to maintain the quality of the articles and have been discussing numerous times about forming consistency over all the articles in that project; this is especially hard when we have to deal with the inexperiences of IP editors coupled with fan vandalism on a daily basis. I am not here to argue, just to let you know you have offended me in that manner and also by throwing WP:EL in my face since I had already edited in the link in the reception section. You clearly did not take my edits in good faith. KirtZJTalk 00:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neon Genesis Evangelion[edit]

Due to the insular nature of the WikiProject, I have opened my proposal up for debate at AFD.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Gargantia on the Verdurous Planet[edit]

Hi KirtZJ:

First of all, english is not my mother tongue, but I'll try my best to be super clear, please excuse any language mistakes if they are not tremendously grave or funy (hehe!). Secondly, although this really is a trivial matter, I'd like to explain myself and try to make you understand why what you claim to be true is an error.

Now, let's get to the point, I'm refering to your undoing of my edition at the Gargantia article (Undid revision 570105253 by Folclorcaduco (talk) August 28, 2013 is the correct release date.)

The "Original video animation infobox" stated the following:

"Released August 28, 2013"

The event (release of OVA at august 28, 2013) might be scheduled at this date and will most probably happen, but it hasn't happened yet, now, as "released" implies the event already took place... then the infobox information is wrong.

Would you reconsider to add the question mark i added? Or maybe other solution might be even better, like changing "released" for "scheduled release"... and when the event happens, and only if it happens, then it could be changed back to "released" (this should also be verifiable, wich currently is not... but let's not be too picky? hehe).

WP:5 WP:ISNOT WP:CBALL

Folclorcaduco (talk) 02:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Do you even realize how utterly ridiculous you sound right now? That date August 28th, 2013, is coming up in two days why would you remove it and replace it with a question mark. I will go out of my way to explain that what you are trying to do is absolutely pointless; even though it isn't worth my time. Wikipedia cannot contain a "Question Mark" as an official release date, especially when there is an official release date with a citation available, hence making your case lack credibility. In addition, this edit is ridiculously small and again will become obsolete in less than two days. >> KirtZMessage 06:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Don't even mind me, i must stop being a drama queen and a troll, i tend to blow things out of proportion.

Re: Oreimo 2[edit]

I feel my comment was well-warranted. You need to take a step back and write a summary not as a fan but as a neutral observer of events. I don't find "Finally realizing that the brother she always wanted was the person standing next to her all this time" to be neutral whatsoever, because that is merely your own interpretation of the scene; in other words, it was not expressly spelled out that this was the case in that particular scene; you are simply adding in the "hidden subtext", and anyone reading it can clearly see that a fan wrote it. Writing like that is unencyclopedic and should be avoided. I would recommend taking a look at WP:WAF and WP:PLOTSUM if you haven't already.-- 09:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

I also apologize for the "fan gushing" comment and insulting you. I guess I could have worded it better, so I'm partially at fault.-- 09:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
It's cool. >> KirtZMessage 12:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I just happened upon here and I also wonder, KirtZ, when you will improve on your summaries. It's still written in complete play by play akin to a fan-site; though I am indifferent to it since it's better than nothing and I don't edit those articles. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Whoops, might've sounded too mean spirited. You have also done a lot of good for episode articles in the long run. Keep it up DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
That's alright Zero, I know you brought up my summaries in the past; rather than defend myself as having my own writing style, I'd already decided to reduce the amount of characters I use for series that I may start in the next Fall season. So fear not, your words were not unheeded. I'm still searching for that perfect balance in episodic summaries, especially between the number of characters used, noting important details without leaving readers wanting, and reading aesthetic. Some may say such a thing doesn't exist, but I believe it does. Hmm, that sounded pretty deep in retrospect; wasn't really my intention. Also I appreciate the compliment. >> KirtZMessage 22:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Ingress[edit]

Thanks for the thanks re Ingress. I'm a big fan of the game, but I'm a Wikipedian here. kencf0618 (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I'm glad someone addressed the maintenance tags. Remember what I sad about the number of pictures. All in all, good work. >> KirtZMessage 21:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I got a round tuit. kencf0618 (talk) 23:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Btooom! and Crunchyroll[edit]

Please take note that Crunchyroll isn't a TV station, and it doesn't stream BTOOOM! only in North America; the data in infobox is not accurate. There are many anime series streamed by Crunchyroll that their articles don't list it as a TV network. Is there a consensus to list Crunchyroll as a TV network in infoboxes? Can you provide some examples that another user has added Crunchyroll as a network? Raamin (talk) 01:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear user, you have removed the information I added to the article, in Anime section, for the 2nd time. You could have simply undone this specific edit, but for some reason, have decided to undo all my 4 edits, including the added informations, and a grammatical correction [It began aired] . I don't intend to start an edit war; please correct your last edit. Raamin (talk) 02:52, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't think you quite grasp the nature of online digital distribution services. Services such as Crunchyroll, Viz Media's Viz Anime, Neon Alley, Anime Network and Funimation etc are usually the first companies to obtain Japanese media for an English release. This doesn't necessarily mean that the media in question has to be released as an English dub; Funimation, Crunchyroll and Viz Anime all simulcast anime series that they have obtained on their websites on the same day as their premiere in Japan using English subtitles. Now this is where it gets interesting. Listing every single country that these services make their content available too is pointless due to the nature of the internet, whereby any website is accessible from any country using some means. It is best to list the primary country that the media is targeted at being distributed to by these websites, in this case—North America, since they are all based there. The same principle applies to the company Madman Entertainment—an Australian company.
—Now what does this have to do with the |network_en = parameter code. Simple, if the the parameter exists there is no reason it shouldn't be used, again due to to the nature of the internet, the aforementioned companies, Crunchyroll included can technically be listed as channels, since all of them can be viewed on TVs using their own apps. For example Crunchyroll can be accessed on a PS3, same as Neon Alley. So what is the actual difference. The is where it actually becomes a bit of a grey area. They can be left out of the parameter or they can be included. But if they can be included they should be included because there is really no reason not to consider them as TV Networks.
Also I made changes to the last edit you seem to be fretting about, with better wording. >> KirtZMessage 11:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
You have removed informations I added previousley to the article with your rollback edit two times, and refused to bring it back after I inforemd you; this is not ok.
I am fully aware of the nature of digital distribution; Crunyhroll and Niconico services are not the same as Neon Alley. You claim that your edits is common practice in en.wikipedia, but it doesn't seem to be the case. Raamin (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Its amazing how you guys go crazy over the smallest of edits. You really need to stop digressing. Now you've accounted yourself for all four of my reverts. It is common practice and allowed because of being a gray area. If you didn't feel like taking the time to read my explanatory response that is NOT my problem; you claim to understand how they work, yet I noticed you left CR under the |network_en = following your edit. >> KirtZMessage 21:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
What I did, was simply undoing your previous edit, becuase your rollback reverted edits that were not controversial and had no major problems. You can't force me to add something to the infobox which I clearly don't support. You could easily add what you wanted back to the infobox; but decided to revert all my edits. Raamin (talk) 22:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Well then that means this entire discussion was pointless wasn't it? Why didn't you just revert the uncontroversial edits instead of asking me to in the first place and blowing this whole thing out of proportion, Sigh. Forget it. >> KirtZMessage 22:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (List of The Devil Is a Part-Timer! episodes) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating List of The Devil Is a Part-Timer! episodes, KirtZJ!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great work.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Japanese episode list formatting[edit]

Could you tell me why you have RomajiTitle come before KanjiTitle and EnglishTitle the last of the three? And why you use "01", "02", etc.? This is not how the template is suggested to be formatted at all and you make a lot of these episode lists.—Ryulong (琉竜) 09:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Also why do you label songs without Japanese language titles with "<!-- No Nihongo-->"? And if there is Japanese, you should really put the translated title in the 4th parameter and not the 3rd.—Ryulong (琉竜) 09:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

So the first question was rhetorical right? Anyway I wasn't aware that the template I saved was outdated. So it's not cool to come at me so aggressively. I'll update now thanks. Also, the "No nihongo" is hidden so it isnt hurting anyone, but you have more experience so I'll kill the tags too. >> KirtZMessage 09:54, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
I didn't mean to be rude, but I'm sorry if I came off that way. I just see these odd choices for formatting all over the place and it just doesn't seem helpful when updating stuff like this.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
No problem; thanks again for the heads up. I'll get around to fixing the formatting on the pages I'm working on in addition to anywhere else I encounter them. >> KirtZMessage 13:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Valvrave's premiere date[edit]

Hello. You recently edited the listed date for valvrave's second season's premiere from October 10 to 17. ([1], [2])

Was this an error? I cannot find any reliable sources (or unreliable ones) that support anything other than October 10. HigherFive | 10:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

An anon user had edited the page before myself and changed the date from the initial October 10th and since I myself had been unable to find any good sources I took the edit on good faith. That was an error on my part, it seems as though the official website was updated with the actual airdates which suggest the 10/10/2013 on MBS. Last time I checked that wasnt the case but thanks for pointing it out. >> KirtZMessage 10:31, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to do the reverts. Happy editing! HigherFive | 20:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
No worries. I'll be giving the entire article a major overhaul soon anyway. >> KirtZMessage 02:33, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Main Cast of Devil Survivor 2 The Animation.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Main Cast of Devil Survivor 2 The Animation.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Just a suggestion for Beyond the Boundary[edit]

I see you're working on our article for Beyond the Boundary now. Just a quick suggestion: since apparently "youmu" is a made-up term, it would probably be a good idea to define what a youmu is somewhere in the article (obviously not in a Terminology section, probably in the Plot section, even in a single sentence or phrase; alternatively, youmu can be defined under the Youmu subsection of the Characters section). Would that work? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

I added the description. Since it seems like borderline Terminology I left it open for anyone to start a talk discussion should it be challenged. —KirtZMessage 23:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification[edit]

Reply. Avengingbandit 02:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

New section on the Anime and Manga RfC[edit]

Hello there. Since the Anime and Manga RfC seems to have developed a consensus for the "It depends on notability and uniqueness of each adaptation", I have started a thread to see if we can offer metrics or further guidance for such case by case... erm... cases. I have no idea if such a thing is even possible to draft up, but since having it might help, I figured I'd try. The thread is HERE, and as a previous participant in the RfC I wanted to let you know about it using this overly long, rambling message. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 15:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ero Manga Sensei - My Little Sister and the Locked Room for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ero Manga Sensei - My Little Sister and the Locked Room is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ero Manga Sensei - My Little Sister and the Locked Room until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..-- 22:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tsukasa Fushimi[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Tsukasa Fushimi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 22:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Yu Narukami sandbox[edit]

I have been working on a Yu Narukami sandbox here after checking there was real world information about his role in the series. Things are looking good but by any chance do you know Japanese? I believe one of these interviews has information about his characterization as explained by the staff. I also haven't been able to find comments about his voice actors. If you have the chance, feel free to edit the sanbox. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Those interviews are so short and most of them are incredibly vague with everyone really only declaring their feelings towards the P4 anime adaptation. I found one made by Romi Park when her character's bond with Yu solidified at the end of Episode 17. Unshō Ishizuka and Akemi Kanda made references to the family ties established in Episode 18—but made no reference of Yu and it would be a bit of s stretch (but doable) to cite his induction into their family at the end of the episode. The actual VA Daisuke Namikawa described his simultaneous feelings of "pressure and joy" when he learned of the adaptation but after that, nothing else he says is relevant. The same goes for the production staff including Kishi. There are about three or four interviews with Johnny Young Bosh floating around YouTube though. I found one where he described his voice work for the game and the anime and his own feelings towards both — So a citation could be created around it. —KirtZMessage 20:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. That's very useful. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Whoops, I just noticed there were three directors' interviews. I only clicked the first one while going down the list. My bad. The second one is the only one that matters. I extracted what was relevant and included it in the sandbox. —KirtZMessage 03:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Nice. I already created the article Yu Narukami. Thanks for the help.Tintor2 (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem. —KirtZMessage 20:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
I found this interview with the anime voice actors. Maybe it includes something useful.Tintor2 (talk) 00:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
I'll get to it in a bit. Also, did you consider adding a screenshot (perhaps from the anime) depicting Yu and Izanagi in a single frame? —KirtZMessage 10:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Author or Crunchyroll[edit]

So in this case, the author of Log Horizon, on his twitter, confirmed that the name of the expansion pack, ノウアスフィアの開墾 (Nōasufia no Kaikon?) to be a direct reference to Homesteading the Noosphere. Do we still use Crunchyroll's translation of Novasphere Pioneers? Freezingfield (talk) 08:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Appreciate the heads up. I created a suitable reference using the information. —KirtZMessage 22:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Persona 3 The Movie Banner Ad.png[edit]

I noticed you uploaded this picture taken by someone who uploaded it on flickr. It may be a free-use image (Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr). I am not familiar with flickr but I believe this image is public domain. If you will, I suggest setting it up on commons. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. I'll get to it in a bit. —KirtZMessage
The image seems to be copyrighted with "All Rights Reserved" so I don't think it meets the requirements of Commons, which is a bit unfortunate. —KirtZMessage 00:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Log Horizon[edit]

I see that you undid my revision with the comment of "irrelevant bloating." I do not see why those details are not relevant. While the world of Log Horizon focuses on the Japanese server, it is a worldwide game. If I understand correctly, one of the side stories is set on a different country server, which reinforces the point that it is a worldwide universe. MagicianLord (talk) 19:53, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

It is a form of trivia and should be avoided i.e. useless information when plot summaries should be concise and to the point. See WP:HTRIVIA and WP:PLOTSUM —KirtZMessage 20:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Steins;Gate Movie Project plot[edit]

Hi, I also fixed a lot of grammatical issues (obvious errors like plural words that should have been singular). What about sticking to the revision and then paring it down? Compare my revision with the orig. and you'll see what I mean; thanks Keron Cyst (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

There are no errors. You should read WP:PLOTSUM. —KirtZMessage 11:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Actually, there are obvious grammatical errors that your reversion brought back: the current version reads "... the memories... is overloading his Reading Steiner." "Is" should be "are." Additionally, try reading this last part of one of the current plot's sentences aloud: "... as well as prevent a future ruled by SERN due to the invention of a time machine no longer exists." By the way, WP:PLOTSUM says nothing about requiring use of last names, and the current plot uses first names for characters other than Okabe, which is inconsistent. These are among other things I was aiming to improve, so I would appreciate my edit being allowed. Thanks - Keron Cyst (talk) 06:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I used this revision as reference. Plot summaries should be as concise and accessible as possible, which is why the current revision is set, though it also has issues. Keron's edits are bordering fancruft and introduces unnecessary detail (grudgingly accepting his wish instead of the current revision's "accept his wish") ("which led him to take on his 'mad scientist' persona to emotionally protect Mayuri"), and jargon ("which has a divergence difference of .000001%."). Keron is right about about the grammar issues though. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

I see what you mean, though that "jargon" is directly plot-related, by the way! But now that I know what "fancruft" means, I see that those sorts of details should be reserved for the actual fan Wikia. I'll see about doing a take two and tapering down the edit to the necessary stuff. Thanks for reviewing the edit history - Keron Cyst (talk) 07:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Persona 3[edit]

How about in the trailer of Persona Q then? He is clearly named as Minato Arisato, and the Protagonist of Persona 4 is also named Yu Narukami. But okay, I won't change it again unless if there's official sequel of Persona 3 or Persona 4 game like Persona 4 Arena or such is published with official name for the Protagonist of Persona 3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.124.46.242 (talk) 02:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

As I've explained, the use of Minato Arisato in PQ was Atlus' attempt at fan servicing the Japanese audience of the P3 series since they had been referring to the Protagonist by that name.
You seem to think Yu Narukami is used across the board. He is called Sōji Seta in the P4 manga and by another name entirely in the P4 stage production. Your reasoning also suggests that despite the name's notability, we should change Yu Narukami to "Protagonist" because he isnt called Yu other than in the anime and two video game spin-offs. (See WP:NOTE). Enough information exists for Persona 3's Protagonist to warrant its own article in which he would be called either Makoto Yuki or Minato Arisato due to the notability acquired by both names—but least likely Minato Arisato and not likely Sakuya Shiomi in that order. (See WP:NRVE) —KirtZMessage 09:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Pokémon: XY episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Armbrust The Homunculus 03:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

This warning really feels like a "shoot first ask questions later" type of thing. A prime example of the dangers of watching and maintaining high traffic pages. —KirtZMessage 04:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Persona 4: The Animation[edit]

Will you allow me to shorten the episode summaries to Persona 4: The Animation? There was a notice about it:

"This section may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience. Please help relocate any relevant information, and remove excessive detail that may be against Wikipedia inclusion policy. (September 2013)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nd4SU (talkcontribs) 00:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Go ahead. There's no need to ask for permission. Rather than ask me you probably could have mentioned your plan here. But do not place hidden messages like your previous notice inside articles. Just make sure you mind the criteria at WP:WIABCA. Be careful though, the present summaries may be long right now but no one attempted a summarization because frankly, P4 is a difficult series to summarize due to the risk of sacrificing important information. —KirtZMessage 00:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I understand.... I've been editing for many years now, specifically many anime articles like you do. I never meant any to make edits that were thought to be unnecessary. I will try my best on these summaries. But it may take a couple weeks to finish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nd4SU (talkcontribs) 00:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Fairy Tail Best[edit]

Thanks for fixing the infobox for Fairy Tail. That edit by the other user totally confused me. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

No problem! Just doing what I can. —KirtZMessage 03:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Rollback Request[edit]

Hi KirtZJ - I've added the rollback flag for you. Pedro :  Chat  13:41, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Alright, Thank you! —KirtZMessage 14:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Persona 3 The Movie character table[edit]

How does it then people that Aigis wasn't seen in the first film, but she will be seen in the second one if both pads are gray and empty? CAJH (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2014 (EET)

The entire Midsummer Knight's section is grey because Aniplex has yet to release any sort of update regarding these characters and their VAs. —KirtZMessage 17:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Are you certain it's unwise to show the appearance of the character confirmed even though voice actor/actress is unknown? CAJH (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2014 (EET)
Sorry for writing the previous message without being logged in. CAJH (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2014 (EET)
No problem. That's how I've seen character tables be used. A white column box shouldn't be blank and using a question mark is generally avoided. The columns should remain grey until Aniplex releases an actual update confirming their VAs rather than something ambiguous. We might see something at the next full moon. —KirtZMessage 18:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Minor edits checkbox, etc.[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to File:Dblack.png, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Additionally to the above boilerplate notice. I fixed the deletion nomination of the above named file, which you had incorrectly transcluded to the log. However, while doing so, I noticed you had included in the edit summary "minor fix." A deletion of a file is not a minor fix. Please be a bit more accurate with your edit summaries. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Thats fine. How was the last nomination incorrect though for future reference? If you were talking about the one with the error I had renomed it. And the "Minor fix." edit summary description is automatically saved in my web browser but thanks for assuming that conclusion of yours and biting my head off. —KirtZMessage 19:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Never mind, I found the correct one under the incorrect one. I was not "biting" or being hostile in anyway. There was a bit of a misunderstanding and I have resolved it and reverted my edits. Safiel (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Sword Art Online[edit]

It's no 'fancrufted' additions or whatever, it's a fact. If you don't believe it watch the anime yourself and witness the dates posted on the screen. I've seen dozens of different anime web summaries, and some of them also have dates added in. Let's not live in a world where calendars don't exist okay.

When this list is rewritten with four line summaries for a Featured List in the future there will be nothing like that. It is trivial information. Most of those anime web summaries are made by fans. Wikipedia isnt a fan-based website where we include flavor text. —KirtZMessage 23:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I just don't see how you can call it something made by fans. As far as I know the summaries aren't filled with sentences that are made up or plagiarism, at least I think so. I know 'trivia' means unimportant things or details. Filling in the blanks is what I'm desperate to do, not to mention I'm a very organize person. Thank you

I dont think you quite understand what I said. You should reread it. See WP:HTRIVIA—"Trivia is broadly defined as information that is not important". This connects with the style outlined in WP:PLOTSUM.
It sounds harsh but it is the general way things are done. Summaries should be as concise as possible and information needs to be prioritized and cut. Ask any other experienced editor on the WP:A&M they'll basically tell you the same thing. And another thing, Please sign your messages with four tildes. —KirtZMessage 01:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't agree with you sorry.

Your GA nomination of Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth[edit]

The article Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

If you'd forgotten, the article's still on hold. It's close; I just want citations for the minor characters and a fix about the word "comming," as specified on the page. Tezero (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. I apologize for not making the changes ASAP, various IRL circumstances kept me from editing Wikipedia for a couple days. —KirtZMessage 09:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth[edit]

The article Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 15:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Congrats KirtZJ! Nice work on the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Tintor, much appreciated! —KirtZMessage 20:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyond the Boundary Promotional Poster.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyond the Boundary Promotional Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Log Horizon Promotional Image.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Log Horizon Promotional Image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 2, Midsummer Knight's Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Shoji Meguro[edit]

You reverted the edits I made to the Discography section on Meguro's page. I made the edits in an effort to make it match the Video Game section above. I'm not against using tables for a game composers' discography (as I've done the same on many other pages), but I think either the game section is edited to include the table format or it should revert back to the edits I made. - Dissident93 (talk) 04:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll eventually add a table, unless you'd like too. Reverting would be quite counter-productive. As I said, musicians generally have their works listed in tables since the use bullet lists on their articles are generally an outdated format. Just look at the history of Meguro's article and how little attention it's been getting. Some good examples of table use are Supercell (band), LiSA, Sekai no Owari, Livetune etc. At any rate, tables are generally the much neater format. —KirtZMessage 05:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Hamatora episodes[edit]

I'm going to assume it was your edits. Multiple static sizes in a row causes problems on different zooms and devices (link) DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm, I'm guessing its the format then. Can you repair it, I don't know what the solution is. —KirtZMessage 09:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
It's the ems. You should use percentages. I'm not sure what happens if size parameters are left empty, but it should be fine. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll make the changes. —KirtZMessage 10:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Persona 4: The Animation[edit]

I've liked your work in Devil Survivor 2: The Animation and decided to give Persona 4: The Animation a try. If you have the chance, could you add production information or info about the cast since you are quite the expert? Regards and keep up the nice work. It tends to motivate me.Tintor2 (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Finally someone is attending to P4TA. I'll start digging up some research for the sections. I'm not sure I'll be able to include them for a while though since I'm quite busy with other stuff lately. Thanks for the words as well. —KirtZMessage 19:30, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 1 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Log Horizon episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hamatora book[edit]

Any idea what is this Hamatora book? Might be needed to be added to the article.Tintor2 (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

From what I can gather, it seems to be an official art book. There are illustrations by Kodama and art from the first episode including the various environments and characters. You could use animate link to reference the release date and the twitter link if you're referencing its contents. —KirtZMessage 06:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Makoto Yuki[edit]

Made a small sandbox of Makoto Yuki here. However, considering how little reception the new film, I believe I'll have to wait to make it an article. Regards and good luck.Tintor2 (talk) 00:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Nice. Looks good. There should be character opinions in some of the P3 video game reception and we should prioritize those first. I cant imagine it would be much different from Yu Narukami though. —KirtZMessage 16:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Yeah but for Yu Narukami I took advantage of his anime reception. I don't think there video game critics talk about silent characters the player characterizes too much.Tintor2 (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Nevermind, looks like I can take advantage of some reviews articles to write an article. Things are looking neat.Tintor2 (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Alright, looks like you have it covered. I'll tweak the aesthetics in a bit. —KirtZMessage 17:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Mission accomplished my friend! Makoto Yuki (Shin Megami Tensei: Persona). I'll work in it later as now I'm a bit tired and I'll take a nap time.Tintor2 (talk) 17:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I did most I could. If you wish to tweak or add anything you are welcome to do it. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Help with interview[edit]

Hi there. Today I created Akane Tsunemori and found there was an interview of the series with the character's VA here. Could you help me with this? It could contain important info to add the character's creation section which is the smallest by now. Regards and good luck.Tintor2 (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I'll give it a shot today. That's a lot to sift through for one interview. —KirtZMessage 06:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
There wasn't much to get from the link you provided. The VA's were mostly questioned about the series setting from their own views and not their characters. Although Hanazawa had a line of interest which supported the changes Akane would be forced to go through due to her experiences. —KirtZMessage 21:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. That really helped. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hamatora radio show[edit]

I added info about a Hamatora radio show to the article but I thing I am missing information since I can't read the Japanese articles. Also, by any chance do you remember if this interview had information about a character named Shinya Kogami. There is potential to make an article about him. Regards and good luck with Devil Survivor Animation GAN.Tintor2 (talk) 17:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay, but those will have to wait until the weekend. I'm pretty much swamped with other stuff right now. And thanks, I'll try my best to make it pass. —KirtZMessage 14:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: Devil Survivor[edit]

Yeah, while working in Shin Megami Tensei: Devil Survivor 2 I also found some good feedback for the list. If you search in google "Devil Survivor game script" you will find several websites that transcribed the two games. That's how I managed to referenced the two video games' plot sections. Also about creation I know the two artbooks but information about each character (for example, Yuzu's dressing style is explained by the author as a way to attract the DS1's MC) but I have only access to one preview page. I'll see whether I can work in the list or add more to the game. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

I'd appreciate anything else you can do. Sorry I havent been much help lately. I'm pretty much swamped. KirtZMail 19:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh yeah thanks for the help with Makoto Yuki. For DeSu1 game script check this. For DeSu2 game script check this. It's ironic though how I can't find almost nothing about the making of Devil Survivor 2 game while the anime has a lot though XD. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Yu Narukami became GA! Hooray!Tintor2 (talk) 16:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Nice work on the article! Best. KirtZMail 15:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
By the way, the Persona 3 movie website made one or two updates on special. Maybe there are comments about the second movie.Tintor2 (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Was there? Could you link me to what was new because I cant see anything that I havent gone through yet, unless I missed something. Im only seeing stuff related to Chapter 1. Anyway I'm planning a major edit for Chapter 2 this weekend and have a tonne of references to sift through so anything will help. KirtZMail 19:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Staff comment was updated on 3/25. I really hope it means 2014 if not it's old info. I wonder if through this film we might be able to create an article for Aigis considering how prominent she and how famous is her actress (I also have a lot of creation info but let's leave that for later).

By the way, do you think the Devil Survivor character list should be splitted for each game? It feels weird since there is no connection between each game.Tintor2 (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Thats Chapter 1 material. An Aigis article sounds like a great idea though. Considering she was a main P3 character not to mention the main character in "The Answer". You probably dont necessarily have to wait for Chapter 2 since there should be reception about her as a video game character. I suspect there will be anime reception about her like there was for Makoto in Chapter 1 once the second film drops.
I'm not sure about Devil Survivor. It might be more useful to have the character lists together since there probably isnt much reception about their characters. At least as one list or split, it probably wont be as large as something like Persona. But, since the page is still almost 95% plot summary with a lack of references, it might be too soon to decide. KirtZMail 22:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
I did a small search in regards to Aigis but couldn't find much real world info other than this. I'll try asking for help to another user.Tintor2 (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Oversight[edit]

If this edit was your IP, you can request to have the revision suppressed as to maintain your privacy at WP:OVERSIGHT.

@Ging287 That was not me, I made it ambiguous because it looked like something that might cause a headache like the "Jaeger" thing. Also, please sign your talk message. Best. KirtZMail 21:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Production notes[edit]

In case you have free time could check these production notes to see if there is information about the cast from PsychoPass? Additionally, I created Shinya Kogami yesterday and I got little creation. Remember this? One of the interviewed people is Kogami's VA so I wonder if the interview has something about the characterization which might help with the article. Regards and good luck with the Persona 3 articles.Tintor2 (talk) 18:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Toonami list[edit]

i made a compromise for lists to help out. I hope you like it, so please voice your opinion there. Lucia Black (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Madoka Kaname and other Madoka characters[edit]

Hello KirtZJ. For some time now I have been thinking of writing an article about Madoka Kaname (which currently is a redirect to List of Puella Magi Madoka Magica characters), as well as for Homura Akemi and maybe Mami Tomoe (same as Kaname). Madoka (the show) was a huge hit in Japan (that's an understatement), and probably in Japanese sources, some would talk about its eponymous main character too, particularly after the latest movie (Rebellion) was released. What do you think? Do you think they have been covered in enough Japanese sources to be notable? And do you think any of them are notable, in the first place? If they are notable, what would be a good place to start looking for sources? Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Yamato Hotsuin[edit]

A user created Yamato Hotsuin‎. I'm a bit busy right now so I won't be able to help in the making but I believe your experience with the Animation article might help. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure Yamato has acquired enough notability to warrant his own article. The user who created the page is also creating Hibiki Kuze who has even less notability since Yamato's development slightly outweighs the Protagonist's. DS2 (and its media) is a completely isolated video game afterall. —KirtZMail 02:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
I see. Then the articles should be merged back.Tintor2 (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Devil Is a Part-Timer! DVD Blu-ray Volume 1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Devil Is a Part-Timer! DVD Blu-ray Volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. czar  14:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU Blu-ray Cover Volume 1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU Blu-ray Cover Volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. czar  14:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Re:My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU[edit]

The romantic aspect of this show has always been present, but is fairly subtle compared to the typical romantic shows. For example, Yui has been in love with Hachiman since Volume 1, and feelings among other characters having been heavily hinted at. Romance along with the main character's cynicism are two major driving points of this show that I don't think can be taken away. Freezingfield (talk) 08:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Sailor Moon#GA?[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sailor Moon#GA?. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, KirtZJ. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sword Art Online episodes/archive1.
Message added 12:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey! I already responded to the problems about the list. By the way, thanks for the criticisms, it helped a lot. Thanks! FairyTailRocks 12:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, could you use subst:rc to make the FLC easier to navigate? Also, could you do something about your talk page? It has gotten pretty big (by length and bytes). DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 21:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

I need to sort through this page's history and restore some stuff before I can start archiving. —KirtZMessage 20:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

seiyu in plot[edit]

Hello. I just want to ask, in Persona 3 Movie page, is it really necessary to mention the seiyus of the characters in the plot like: Makoto Yuki (Akira Ishida)? This is something new to me because I didn't find anything like that in any anime movies synopsis that I've read. Arami-re (talk) 02:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Im not treating the page as an anime film but rather a general film, and mentioning the actors (in this case VAs) is acceptable. Look at the plots of Atlantis: The Lost Empire and The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film). At any rate I'm gearing it up for an FLC. —KirtZMail 03:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Ikutsuki's first name in movie plot[edit]

Why shoudl we use his first name in plot description of this movie: Persona 3 The Movie: Chapter 1, Spring of Birth or anything related to it? In games his first name was mentioned only once and every other character used only his last name or called him just 'Chairman'. CAJH (talk) 12:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Because this is a film and NOT a video game. For consistency with all characters, first names are used throughout. —KirtZMail 12:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't think that rule is limited only for video games. Consistency doesn't mean that every character must use only their first names whatever the story or platform (film, TV series, video game) is. CAJH (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
However, I will eave your edits be, if someone else defends your opinion on this or the rules of Wikipedia support your vision more than mine or many others. CAJH (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
No, I meant you are thinking about the film as if it WERE a video game, which is an incorrect treatment, it is merely adapting a source material. The film should have consistency within its own 'film' universe. This is why the Tag, mentioning that the sections not be edited with P3 Game Details is there. The naming scheme falls under this. —KirtZMail 16:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for still complaining, but that was not what I meant. I never said that I'm doing this in order to compare it to video game itself. But for example in many other games, movies and comics of any franchise (not only in Persona 3) some characters have been referred by their last names. I think the writers do this because of the character's role or because it feels more suitable. Even if in the movie, when the characters would call him only by last name, would you still use the first name? I've seen the movie and there other characters only called him 'Chairman' and he himself told his full name only when he introduced himself to Makoto as far as I remember. CAJH (talk) 07:24, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Persona 4 the Golden Animation Promotional Image.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Persona 4 the Golden Animation Promotional Image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Fairy Tail 2[edit]

Regarding your reversions, some acknowledgement should be made that Japan is dividing the series this way. I didn't remove 'season 5' I just made a tiny note, what harm does that do? Ranze (talk) 02:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

The series is a continuation. There is no reason to mention "Series 2" or the like. —KirtZMessage 11:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
That's just it, Japan isn't dividing the series that way. "Fairy Tail 2" or "Fairy Tail Series 2" are terms that have never appeared on any official Japanese page or banner for the series, any press release, or the Japanese advertising for the series. Among the official sites for the series, slapping something with a 2 on the end is something only Crunchyroll has done. That's why websites like MyAnimeList and Anime News Network list it under something like "Fairy Tail (2014)", rather than "Fairy Tail 2". In short, there is no real divide of that kind to make a note of. 108.28.233.191 (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Devil Survivor 2: The Animation[edit]

I thought i point out some issues with the article here so that it wont affect GA status.

  • Music section is completely made up of audio releases. perhaps best suited in the "Audio" section. but if not, that's fine. However, i will contest to the music infobox of a single because it does contain more than one soundtrack release.
Moved to "Music and audio". I think a "single" can have more than one song on disc. —KirtZMessage 15:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't think its necessary to list the episodes if there's already a list-article dedicated to it. I'm not sure if you added hat or someone else.
I guess the Ep. list can probably go. I figured it might have been a good idea to use the <onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> parameter but I guess we can take it out. —KirtZMessage 15:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
  • With just three Drama CDs, it seems like you can include them in the prose rather than have them listed. I don't think it would be that long, especially if you have the nihongo foot. Instead of trying to have one sentence cover all three Drama CDs, probably one sentence covering one at a time.
  • Its probably better to save the manga list in a sandbox so that when it gets long enough, you can make it into a separate list article. Right now there's to list, and i think its getting in the way of re-organizing the media section.
I dont see it posing any harm to the section right now. I already made a redirect so if/when it gets too large, we can move it there. —KirtZMessage 15:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
  • The supporting cast, although well sourced, might not be relevant enough to have. Again, similar to manga section, probably save additional information onto a sandbox so you know when to make it. However, i believe the main cast can stay

Let me know what you think of these suggestions. Lucia Black (talk) 01:48, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lucia, Thanks for the feedback. I'll have some time to work on the page on Thursday and I'll respond to these individually. By the way, I took alot of things into consideration when formatting that page. I'll get back to you. —KirtZMessage 04:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of List of Encouragement of Climb episodes (Season 1)[edit]

I'm afraid that your GA nomination of List of Encouragement of Climb episodes (Season 1) unfortunately falls under a criteria for speedy failing as a stand-alone list. You may nominate it as a featured list if you feel that it already matched the criteria there, or withdraw this nomination.

Please contact me on my talk page if I perceived anything wrong. Thank you! ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Episode list documentation[edit]

Hi. I saw your hidden note at List of One Week Friends episodes. So you know, the documentations of the template are outdated. ("margin:auto; background:#FFF; table-layout:fixed;") It would be like coding something to be white when by default it is already white. On my zoom, these settings would make One Week Friends look best.

{|class="wikitable" |- style="border-bottom: 3px solid #DEB887;" ! style="width:1%;" | No. ! Title ! style="width:14%;" | Original air date ! style="width:1%;" | Refs.

I have no idea what it'll look like on default zoom without checking though, and this would be the first time I omit the size restriction. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

@DZ, I was only having a problem with a single IP hopper so I put the note. I'll experiment although leaving out that section of the code is new for me. It always leaves the option to change the background color and modify the template size if necessary. —KirtZMessage 14:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Free! (anime)#Comments after the move[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Free! (anime)#Comments after the move. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 5 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Re: Eren[edit]

Thanks. Also, I reworked Eren's article here but nobody in the talk page is paying attention. RegardsTintor2 (talk) 19:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Sailor Moon episodes[edit]

Hi. As you may know, I have nominated the List of Sailor Moon Crystal episodes for a possible Did you know nomination. We may need to add some home media releases for the individual seasons of the previous Sailor Moon anime. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Sjones, Are the media sections necessary for the DYK? They still need to be included on those pages at any rate. I'll do some research. I suspect it'll be a bit hard to locate some online sources though because VHS? —KirtZMessage 19:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
I think 1500+ characters are required, as well as sourcing hooks for DYK as well. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Devil Survivor 2: The Animation[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Devil Survivor 2: The Animation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 14:42, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Devil Survivor 2: The Animation[edit]

The article Devil Survivor 2: The Animation you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Devil Survivor 2: The Animation for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 02:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Bullet Promotional Poster.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Bullet Promotional Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless contributions on animanga-related articles! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Pokemon: XY[edit]

I get that it's "still an episode" but the numbering is skipped in the dub listing as it didn't air in the United States. As it didn't air in Japan either, why should we let it still be episode 826 in the Japanese listing? It should be marked with a dash in case if it were to air later on or something. - Jabrona (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

It's not a special episode. Same as episodes 35 and 38 over here. —KirtZMessage 19:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
I know it's not a special, but it didn't air in it's order as intended so it shouldn't be listed as episode 826 if it were to air later. I don't see the point you're making off of Episodes 35 and 38. They still aired in Japan in their given places which is why they can be listed, but they're skipped in the dub listings as they didn't air in the United States. We should do the same hing for Japanese listings if an episode doesn't air as intended. If you look at the listings for Season 14, the Team Plasma episodes are skipped in both listings as the two-parter didn't air in Japan or over in the United States. - Jabrona (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
@Jabrona, Perhaps that was a bad example. Imagine that in reverse. The point is in fact that the episode does not require special treatment. Even if it gets a later English airing it's numerical order doesnt need changing as it was TV Tokyo's originally intended order. If you still feel otherwise, I suggest you go to the talk page of that article. If you change the numbers yourself that constitutes to original research. —KirtZMessage 23:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Um, putting a ash to indicate it's no longer episode 826 is not me giving it special treatment. What you're doing does as again, the Team Plasma episodes are skipped in the Japanese listing too as they didn't air. The episode may have intended to originally be episode 826, but the fact is another one has aired in it's place so if it were to air later like as episode 850 or something, it would be episode 850 and not 826 and have to be listed as such. We can only keep it as episode 826 if the rotation airing in reruns has it fall between 824 and 826 or some statement saying this episode is still 826. If not, it's only fair if the episode gets a dash. It wouldn't constitute to original research for obvious reasons. The episode didn't air as intended and we have two previous episodes skipped from the Japanese listing as they didn't air. It would be original research to keep this episode listed as episode 826 with no statement saying such. I may just have to take this to the talk page to see if others can share my view. Sorry you couldn't see this. - Jabrona (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Listing and moving episodes around as you see fit based on your own rationale (however much sense it may make) is the definition of original research. The list is fine as is. —KirtZMessage 22:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

SOA hallow fragment[edit]

My edit was adding a direct quote from the reviewer showing the review was invalid and should be ignored by anyone interested in the game , a review starting with how much they hate the anime version of this game is no way to review anything and the adding of this review to the wikipeida page with out a full description of the review and how it was written is misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldie610 (talkcontribs) 17:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

A valid review is valid and is in no way misleading no matter how the reviewer chooses their words since it is usually purely opinionated. This is why usually more than one review is available to provide a somewhat neutral perspective. —KirtZMessage 17:57, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

I've been trying to emulate the Persona 3 Spring of Birth article with Tales of Vesperia: The First Strike but I still have a long way to go. Any feedback or article that might help? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Already gave it a shot.Tintor2 (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Remember the Hamatora book I once showed you in a link? Well, three pages have been scanned and they seem to focus on the designs of Nice, Murasaki and Hajime. Is the information over there useful for the article? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

@Tintor, its trivial information. Nothing useful. —KirtZMessage 02:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
I see. Thanks.Tintor2 (talk) 15:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, KirtZJ. You have new messages at Psjk2106's talk page.
Message added 13:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HigherFive | 13:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Crunchyroll simulcasts[edit]

Regarding your edit on Btooom, how should Crunchyroll simulcasts be noted? They are released during the show's first run, so should they go on network then if you don't think they should go in network_en? Should there be a new parameter in the infobox for such presentations as that tends to be the new release pattern for anime shows? -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

As far as I know it was a practice to remove CR infobox links. There have been numerous debates here, here and, the case with Btooom!, with the community going into a frenzy as usual. On a side note, I figured network_en only referred to networks that air an English dub, not subtitles. If you want you can bring it up (yet again) on the project page. —KirtZMessage 17:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I put the question up in the Template talk:Infobox animanga page so I think the practices you referenced should be added on that template. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
There are some shows that were broadcast in the US with just subs, like Dragon Ball Z (Majin Boo and Kid Boo saga) and GT on International Channel back in the early 2000s. It's great content for the broadcast section of the article. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Aldonah. Zero Episodes issue[edit]

Thanks for fixing what I did there. Sorry to cause a bit of issues for you to fix. BTW, is there anyway we can change it to make it clear how many episodes? Most sites I've visited have listed 12 episodes for this anime. While it is known that it will start again (another season I guess) in January, can it be changed so that it diverts into how many have aired so far and others that are still yet to come? Personally I found it confusing when it listed 24, yet only 12 was aired and there was no mention of what happened with the rest that haven't aired yet in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Den914 (talkcontribs) 06:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Unlike other television series on Wikipedia that update the episode count on an as-they-air basis, the Animanga WikiProject usually lists the total number of anime episodes as stated by official sources where available. Just leave it at that. —KirtZMessage 17:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of One Piece characters#Protagonists vs. main characters[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of One Piece characters#Protagonists vs. main characters. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#RfC. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Beyond the Boundary episode list reversion[edit]

The edits to the Beyond the Boundary episode list which were reverted are in fact corrections of the material originally present or improvements of wording/grammar. Having just watched the anime, the errors were rather obvious. 72.39.122.224 (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

There are NO errors. The material is fine as it stands, leave it at that, all you are doing is justifying the addition of extra data which is not required. —KirtZMessage 22:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

I beg to differ. The very first sentence in the summary for episode 1 is incorrect. Akihito is not contemplating suicide when he sees the other student. Most of the other changes were, as I said previously, for grammar and, I should have added, readability. For example, one of the sentences later in the same synopsis reads "Mitsuki teases Akihito ON being stalked" which should read "Mitsuki teases Akihito ABOUT being stalked" if one uses proper English. There are numerous other instances where word use/choice is suspect. As for justifying extra data, I found that I was usually parsing sentences with an eye to making them clearer and eliminating extraneous information and/or words, but ymmv. 72.39.122.224 (talk) 23:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't have the time to nitpick with you about what you think is wrong with the choice of syntax and literary styles when nothing is. —KirtZMessage 00:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Argevollen Promotional Poster.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Argevollen Promotional Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Buddy Complex Promotional Image.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buddy Complex Promotional Image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Free! - Eternal Summer Promotional Poster.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Free! - Eternal Summer Promotional Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

List of The Devil Is a Part-Timer! episodes[edit]

Hi KirtZJ, I went ahead and put the List of The Devil Is a Part-Timer! episodes up for assessment beyond C-class; I didn't see any major stuff that needed copyediting. Thanks again. -AngusWOOF (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm not so sure it'll pass for B at this stage. The assessment page hasn't been given a decent check since September either. —KirtZMessage 02:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, probably because there's just one editor that actively does the B-class assessment these days. Still worth a shot for now, since I think it's well-referenced. If the summaries are too detailed, that can be trimmed, but I think the other information is pretty much there. -AngusWOOF (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Lord Marksman and Vanadis[edit]

Hi, KirtZJ. I already contacted AngusWOOF and the Anime WikiProject about expanding the Lord Marksman and Vanadis article and the List of Lord Marksman and Vanadis characters article, but I was wondering if you can help me out too. We need to find sources for how it was produced and reception on the series itself, as well as conforming the articles to WP:ANIME standards. Do you think that this is a good idea? Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Alright, when I get some time I'll give the main article a general clean up. I can't help with the character list (or any plot for that matter) because I'm completely unfamiliar with this series. Also, if you're going to expand the other areas, I would suggest moving the Episode list to its own list article because I don't see the main article improving beyond C-class if it remains there. —KirtZMessage 14:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cross Ange Promotional Poster.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cross Ange Promotional Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Lord Marksman[edit]

I wasn't testing, I put the real ending date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.102.136 (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

I put the wrong notice. You'll just have to wait. None of those series have ended yet. —KirtZMessage 06:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Unbreakable Machine-Doll characters[edit]

Ugh that one looks to be a mess with large paragraphs. I tried breaking it into the characters as listed in the anime official site but I get the feeling it has tens of other characters that become important in the light novels so it might be better to shove it all off into a separate article, but it's still excessively detailed. -AngusWOOF (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)