User talk:Kjaergaard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello Kjaergaard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Ucucha (talk) 04:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Interests[edit]

Kjaergaard, what are your interests? Coagulation, tissue remodeling, cancer? -- Boris 05:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

It should appear from the user page now...!!! Kjaergaard 01:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Cool. Would you like to join our little Molecular and cellular biology project's team and help us with those articles that are related to your interests? -- Boris 12:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm now officially on the list... Kjaergaard 06:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Protein-protein docking[edit]

Kjaergaard, check this out. This user - User:Zargulon - has added Protein-protein docking to the protein methods, i'm not sure whether there is such a method (i just don't know, i haven't read much structure stuff) but i know for sure this article is about the science field, not the method (even if there is one), two totally different things. What do you say? -- Boris 18:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

It is primarily a method of computational structural biology, but the theory behind it is probably so extensive, that it has developed into a field in its own right, as could be argued for e.g. x-ray crystallography and protein NMR. I think it should stay in the list, however at some point we might want to branch out the list into different sublists: Computational protein methods, Structural protein methods etc. Kjaergaard 04:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the replay. Well, you know better - that's your own backyard and that's why i asked you. I like the field though. Everything in the cell is pro-pro-interactions - i actually see the cell as one giant protein complex build of different subcomplexes that constantly are broken down and rebuild in a regulated way. -- Boris 16:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Bikini Lines[edit]

Thanks for editing the bikini line section. WikiPedia sure needs more people with expert knowledge in many fields. Perhaps you would also care to expand the short stub that it is now? --Lassefolkersen 20:59, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Great Belt Link[edit]

Great photo you added to Great Belt Fixed Link! Do you by any chance have a similar one of the Oresund Bridge? Zarniwoot 23:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

No, unfortunately not. The flight wasn't that long... :-) Kjaergaard 00:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


Would you care to contribute at Protein-protein_interaction_prediction ?

Protein-protein interaction prediction[edit]

Hi. Are you aware of this new page: Protein-protein interaction prediction? It was off to an unlucky start, being listed on Articles for Deletion.

Featured Picture Candidate[edit]

Spanish shawl.JPG
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Spanish shawl.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.

Congrats! Thanks for your contribution! --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 10:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Cleaning up your user page[edit]

Hey, just wanted to let you know, you can make your user page much neater by moving all that stuff at the bottom to a sub-page, like User:Kjaergaard/temp. --SheeEttin 21:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject Newsletter![edit]

We have a new newsletter!
As you've no doubt noticed, there's a new Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject newsletter, which will be sent out about once a month to all WP:MCB members. This newsletter is designed to perform two equally important functions. Firstly (and obviously, perhaps) it will serve to inform the members of the MCB project of such things as important discussions, votes, and article improvement drives. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the periodic correspondance will hopefully encourage a greater level of participation from the MCB community by acting as a gentle reminder of many of the the interesting tasks that are awaiting completion. If you prefer to receive this newsletter in the form of a link, or not receive it at all, you can add your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Newsletter/Opt Out List.
New project feature: MCB Article Improvement Drive
Have any pet MCB subjects that you think need attention? Have you been longing to be part of a team of like-minded editors working toward a common goal? If so, the MCB Article Improvement Drive is for you! On the first of every month a new article is selected by the MCB with the goal of promoting it to good article status. Make your nominations and cast your votes now, because the first article will be chosen on September 1!
In an effort to organize and motivate the MCB activities, it has recently been proposed that a member of the MCB project take the role of "director", who would be responsible for the administrative side of the MCB project, including but not limited to coordinating recruiting efforts, spamming the newsletter, and maintaining the Article Improvement Drive and MCB Portal. A special discussion/vote page has been created for this proposal, and the vote will run until 23:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC), unless the community decides otherwise.
Odds and ends: what else you got?
Signed...
ClockworkSoul
06:39, Sunday August 27, 2006 (UTC)
If you wish to opt out of having the newsletter posted on your talk page in the future, you may add yourself to the opt out list
Newsletter concept and layout blatantly "borrowed" from the Esperanza newsletter
.

This month's WP:MCB Article Improvement Drive article[edit]

ClockworkSoul 22:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject Votes[edit]

Nuvola apps kcmpartitions.png The Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject has recently opened two surveys that will help to decide the direction of the project. First, nominations are currently being accepted for the position of coordinator of the project. Second, votes and additional suggestions for the official title of that position are also being taken. As a member of the project, we hope that you'll drop by and voice your opinion. – ClockworkSoul 03:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

This month's WP:MCB Article Improvement Drive article[edit]

ClockworkSoul 21:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

One more vote for the coordinator of the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject[edit]

Since two of the three editors nominated for Coordinator of the MCB Wikiproject declined their nominations, one more vote has been posted: should the remaining nominee, ClockworkSoul, be named as the coordinator, or should nominations be reopened? Every opinion counts, so please vote! – ClockworkSoul 17:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject Newsletter[edit]

The project main page has gotten a facelift!
When people visit the project, the very first thing that they see tends to be the project's main page, and with this in mind, the main page has been completely overhauled. To enhance readability the various "goals" sections have been merged, and a detailed "how you can help" section has been added. To increase accessibility for more established members, the links to any resources that were in the main body text have been moved onto the navigation bar on the right. Finally, the whole page has been nicely laid out and given a nice attractive look.
New project feature: peer review
I'm proud to announce the addition of out newest feature: peer review! The MCB peer review feature aims serve as a stepping stone to improve articles to featured article status by allowing editors to request the opinions of other members about articles that they might not otherwise see or contribute to.
Project progress
The article worklist
We’ve had quite a bit of progress on the worklist article in the past month. Not only has the list itself nearly doubled in size from 143 to 365 entries, but an amazing three articles have been advanced to FA status, thanks in great part to the efforts of our very own TimVickers! Remember, the state of the worklist is the closest thing we have to quantifying the progress of the project, so if you get the chance, please take a look at the list, pick a favorite article, and improve it!
Collaboration of the Month
Last month's Collaboration of the Month, cell nucleus, was a terrific success! In one month, the article went from a dismal stub to an A-class article. Many thanks to all of the collaborators who contributed, especially ShaiM, who took on the greatest part of the burden. This month's Collaboration of the Month, adenosine triphosphate, isn't getting nearly the attention of its predecessor, so if you can, please lend a hand!
Finally...
The project has a new coordinator, ClockworkSoul! The role - my role - of coordinator will be to harmonize the project's common efforts, in part by organizing the various tasks required to make the project run as smoothly and completely as possible. Many thanks to those who supported me and those participated in the selection process.
ClockworkSoul, project coordinator
18:16, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
If you wish to opt out of having the newsletter posted on your talk page in the future, you may add yourself to the opt out list
Newsletter concept and layout blatantly "borrowed" from the Esperanza newsletter
.

This month's winner is proteasome![edit]

ClockworkSoul 22:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Could you please write an article about Anfinsen's Dogma?[edit]

I saw you made a nice contribution to Levinthal paradox, and since subjects are connected - you might be interested... I added Anfinsen's Dogma to requested article page - so someone might start it eventually. But what I really feel is that subj is important and it is a shame;) for English wiki not to have an article on it. Here is outside link. TestPilot 20:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!!! I think "D" in dogma should not be capitalized(just like "P" in paradox) so I moved an article. Thank you one more time:) TestPilot 00:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

RDC[edit]

Hi! I see you have contributed significantly to NMR related pages on wikipedia. It would be very helpful if you could glance through Residual dipolar coupling page that I am currently working on. Thanks! Sangak 11:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

This month's winner is RNA interference![edit]

ClockworkSoul 14:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein![edit]

ClockworkSoul 18:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

National academy of sciences[edit]

I think it is a good idea to start and expand the biographies of the national academy of sciences, so I did the next in line. Will you please read it and correct any mistakes. By the way I think you won our WikiWager big time (the-most-articles-in-2006-wager) - congratulations! --LasseFolkersen 08:38, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

FAC[edit]

Hi Kjaergaard! Just in case you have time and interest in the topic (it's a bit far from nmr!):

I would like to have your comments on my work for further improvement. Any suggestion will be very much appreciated. Thanks.Sangak 18:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Serpins[edit]

Hi Kjaergaard - its been great working with you on the serpins page and I'm really pleased with the way in which it is beginning to shape up. I'm still getting to grips with how wiki language functions (and thus my edits have sometimes had unfortunate and unexpected side effects). I will indeed join the MCB team. Jcwhizz 22:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Patrick O. Brown[edit]

I nominated this page for speedy deletion as it lacked an assertion of notability. You can insert the template {{hangon}} at the top of the page if you want to prevent it from being deleted, or discuss it in deletion review if you disagree with this decision. I am notifying you as you seem to be the primary source of the page's material, but I see you haven't really modified it for a while, so forgive me if I'm needlessly taking your time. :) Faithfully, Deltopia 15:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok... I really didn't understand what the National Academy thing meant, but I have tried to atone for my sins. It is no longer a candidate for speedy deletion. Thanks for the info :) Faithfully, Deltopia 23:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Information.svg Hello Kjaergaard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,848 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Jorge Allende - Find sources: "Jorge Allende" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images
  2. Clinton Ballou - Find sources: "Clinton Ballou" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images
  3. Michael Chamberlin (biologist) - Find sources: "Michael Chamberlin (biologist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Operation Moshtarak[edit]

According to icasualties 5 US soldiers were killed in the correct place of the operation, just because a US Serviceman is killed in Helmand or killed in Stan does not mean they were killed in the OP. We have USMC sitting in Helmand that are not participating in the Op. Look at the source i provided and you will see 3 of the 8 you said were not killed in Marjah but near or in Helmand. Also please look at the units that are involved, cross checking them will back what i am saying even more. The 3 other Marines that were killed do not belong to the units participating in the Op.(USMCMIDN (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC))

commons:File:Pacific halibut.JPG[edit]

Reclassification here. correct or not ? - Goudron92 (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)