User talk:Kkj11210

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

(Untitled)[edit]

Hi Kkj11210! First of all I want to apologize in advance about my eventual english mistakes, I am a french student. In fact, in the case of my studies, for a class project we have to build a wikipedia page from A to Z and me and my workmate chose the topic "Vincent Callebaut". And so, we putted some link in for our draft page and every link in we did were redirected to the "Floating Ecopolis" via your Vincent Callebaut page. So excuse us if we did some mistakes by deleting some things on your page. Is it possible for you or an other person to let the link go to our page (I said it earlier, actually it is only a draft page for the moment). The dead line of our work is on the 7th of December.

Please let me know if it is possible to fix this problem, you or me. Please let me know. And I apologize again if we did something bad.

Laurentlouis, the 17th November 2014

Laurentlouis (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

@Laurentlouis: Thank you for your attempt to improve Wikipedia. I have reverted this edit because your edit broke the redirect without contributing anything to the page itself. If you wish to create an article, please feel free to do so, but I will suggest that you read WP:YFA and use the WP:AFC process to ensure that the article is up to Wikipedia standards.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here or visit the WP:TEAHOUSE. KJ Discuss? 01:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Improving accuracy of Hinoki International School wikipage[edit]

Thank you for your message, Kkj11210-- I'm not sure which changes/edits you may have made, but I am the Board President of Hinoki International School, which is not affiliated with Niji Iro Elementary School in any way, so our page should not be redirected to theirs in any way. Hinoki is indeed a bilingual school, so it makes sense for our page -- which we will be fleshing out over the next several hours/days -- be listed under that category. Merci beaucoup! KyouikuKaizen KyouikuKaizen (talk) 03:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

@KyouikuKaizen: You can remove categories that the article does not belong to, but please don't list article topics under non-existent categories. It's technically fine to edit the page to be a stand-alone article, but please be noted that Conflict of Interest editing is strongly discouraged. Per WP:BLANKING, I'll restore the redirect for now. If you still wish to create the article, I suggest disclosing your COI and using the WP:AFC process. KJ Discuss? 05:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG So you are not an administrator i can give you this.. :D Haroldok (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
@Haroldok: Sure, thanks! KJ Discuss? 13:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Creazioni Artistiche Musicali[edit]

Hi, Kkj11210. Sadly I have not the English proficiency to expand this lemma. CAM published soundtracks like the ones of Otto e mezzo, La dolce vita and Amarcord by Fellini, Il Postino by Radford, The Godfather by Coppola. Greetings.--Adriano G. V. Esposito (talk) 03:08, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Adriano G. V. Esposito: Before working on the article, you would want to see if the company is notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article. The general rule of thumb is WP:GNG; if a subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject,then it's generally considered reliable. Please be aware that a company does not have inherent (WP:ORGSIG) or inherited (WP:INHERITORG) notability. If you've determined this, I can help you make the article itself. KJ Discuss? 04:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
It is too hard for me to determine this. Thank you for your effort anyway!--Adriano G. V. Esposito (talk) 05:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Navy Day (Iran)[edit]

Hello. In an article named "Navy Day (Iran)" I'm waiting to find information about this event and forwarding to Public Holydays make confusing. The page Public Holidays gives nothing about the seeking subject. There is nothing about celebrating or history of this day. Maybe you can provide some description about this day in other case the page Navy Day(Iran) doesn't do any sense. Anyway the automatic forwarding to another page with completely another contain is not very fair for the readers. Maybe it would be possible to write few sentences into Navy Day(Iran) and to say that it is a national public day in Iran with a hyperlink to the article Public Days in Iran. Regards --Retro917 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

@Retro917: In this case, the page deserves its own article if it is notable enough. On Wikipedia, it means that it passes WP:GNG (received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject) or for this specific topic, meets WP:EVENT. However, if the topic does not meet either criterion, then the topic may be redirected to a different article which should contain information of the redirect topic. It's true that there is no 'Navy Day' section in Public holidays in Iran. However, this does not mean that the redirect should be changed into a stand-alone article if it is not notable; rather, it encourages editors to add the information to the redirect target, which I highly suggest you do. Feel free to ask anything else. KJ Discuss? 04:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Kkj11210. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 23:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Well You know KFTI AM is now on 1070 Because KLIO Is not there anymore. 68.102.58.146 (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Blanking of Blakey[edit]

Hello, I am trying to create a page about Robert Blakey, but it keeps redirecting to some American chap I've never heard of called G Robert Blakey. I don't want to blank him, but I do want to be able to create a new page for Robert Blakey. Whatkatydid 16:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatkatydid (talkcontribs)

Re: blanking of the redirect Australian socialism[edit]

Hi!

Re my blanking of the redirect Australian socialism (to Economy of Australia), which you reverted.

My intention was to contest the existing contention that Australian socialism is equivalent (or near) to Economy of Australia.

I came across the redirect via Helen Palmer (publisher). The "magazine of Australian socialism" spoken of there would probably not identify itself with the present (or past) Economy of Australia. As neither that nor any other article seemed to fit the bill I thought it better to divorce the two. Perhaps some use of the phrase Australian socialism in another article may come closer but a search for "Australian socialism" doesn't yield any clues.


So my question is if you think Australian socialism is equivalent to (or near) to Economy of Australia.? DadaNeem (talk) 05:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@DadaNeem: I don't have any opinions on the validity of the redirect itself. By revert was due to the fact that blanking an article is disallowed (WP:BLANKING). Please consult my message on your talk page. KJ Discuss? 06:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thank You (4Minute song)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Thank You (4Minute song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a song on the album that was released as a music video. It did not have a campaign to promote it as a single and thus does not have notability on its own. It should be merged into the 4Minute World. The chart performance data is copied from the album and does not reflect the individual single.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article was re-created by an unregistered user who has been trying to add unsourced secondary singles to 4Minute albums, so I am hoping this can be deleted without controversy. Would appreciate your help on this. Thanks. AngusWOOF (talk) 17:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

genus Barteria[edit]

Barteria is a genus in the family Passifloraceae, and also it seems a synonym for genus Brasenia in a completely different botanical family. Why should a genus listed on the Passifloraceae article be linked to something not in Passifloraceae? I have found dozens of these misdirected links in plant genera, I thought it would have been obvious why it was changed so didn't see the need to explain. Sorry for any inconvenience on your part but I think you should correct or delete the link as the synonym Barteria for genus Brasenia is rather obscurely attested,[1] cheers Nickwilso (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://eol.org/pages/5472904/overview