User talk:Kleinzach/Archive 36
|This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at
|This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.|
|Archive 35||Archive 36||Archive 37|
Hello. You reverted my edit (concerning the title's translation) without offering an explanation or contributing to the ongoing discussion in the Talk Page. Wikipedia would be interested in knowing your opinion on the topic. Perhaps your proposed translation is superior to the one I offered. I proposed a metrical translation that conveys the same meaning as the rudimental literal one, and I offered a supporting external reference from another translator. --Majorbolz (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
I wonder if I can interest you, as a music expert and fellow admirer of our much-missed Smerus, in Wikipedia:Featured article review/Olivier Messiaen/archive2 where Smerus commented before his departure. He advised on whether the Messiaen FA should remain an FA; the question is still open and I think your input would be very helpful. Regards, Tim riley (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
All Wikipedia articles are stand-alone. The notables in Kos are indeed, notable. No disagreement. They need to be tied to Kos with a WP:RS which editors (or anybody else) does not have to exit the article to discover. Usually, the bio doesn't have reliable cites for residency either. WP:CHALLENGE covers this, I think. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 21:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)