User talk:Krimuk90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." — Albert Einstein

Vikram filmography[edit]

Hey dude! I expanded the list sometime ago hoping to take it to FLC. Considering your experience and success in this area, may I request you to copyedit and polish the lead section of the article? Thanks in advance. -- Sriram speak up 14:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay. I have been very busy with work. Will try to comment soon. -- KRIMUK90  14:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Sure. No problem. Take your time. Face-smile.svg -- Sriram speak up 15:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for you help thus far. Can you complete the c/e? As you have removed some of the films that aren't worth mentioning in the lead, it will save me some time in finding suitable refs. -- Sriram speak up 12:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Also, I need your opinion on my editing prowess. In comparison to Gemini, have my prose quality gotten any better or is it still the same? I hope to hone my language skills and vocabulary and contribute to better quality articles and your feedback would be helpful. -- Sriram speak up 12:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
I have been making a few edits to reduce your burden. Hope I haven't messed it up. -- Sriram speak up 17:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
No problem. I'll take a look again this evening. :) -- KRIMUK90  05:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
In your absence, I have tried my hand at copy editing and feel I have done a fairly decent job. There might still be some trivia and unnecessary fluff. Feel free to remove the clutter and fine-tune the prose. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 14:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey, sorry I couldn't take a look yesterday. Been extremely busy. I'll take another look as soon as I have some free time. Cheers! -- KRIMUK90  14:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Not a problem. I can understand. -- Sriram speak up

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Hey buddy! Happy Dusshera. Are you still busy? -- Sriram speak up 12:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Dussehra to you too. Yeah, I am busy and unwell. A terrible combination. :( -- KRIMUK90  15:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Oh! Sorry to hear that. Get well soon. And, pls. lemme know if you still intend to help with the c/e. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 14:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! :) I'll take another look soon. Sorry for the delay. -- KRIMUK90  15:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


Excuse me! There was an edit conflict encountered when you and I were editing. Don't think I'm so dumb that I'll write such statements. Some random IP or someone else must have written that. I was writing the Critical reception section. Arjann (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC) you weren't. :) -- KRIMUK90  09:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the copy editing. It really needs more of it. Arjann (talk) 04:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Iam not a Wikipedia editor[edit]

Respected Krimuk Sir,

I am not a Wikipedia editor and I have made Wikipedia account to edit the height of actor Arjun Kapoor. I am very obsessed with that actor and always want to become like him. Sorry if I have deleted your Wikipedia information which have added to actor Arjun Kapoor's article. Now I don't want to add or delete information of actor Arjun Kapoor. I just want to ask you that who are you by profession and want to know if you get paid to write or edit biographies of actors. I just want to know because I am a 20 year old student who is doing his BA from IGNOU and want to know about this profession because if you get a chance to meet with the actor to know his biography and write about him/her. Please reply me back.

From: Mridul Sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mriduls.sharma (talkcontribs) 08:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wow, I am really stumped. I have no idea how to answer this! -- KRIMUK90  13:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Sir I want your answer on your profession[edit]

Respected Krimuk Sir,

I want to know if you make biographies of Bollywood actor's you get paid by doing this or not. Maybe you are reporter who knows everything about that actor and writing article on Wikipedia. Please reply me back and tell me in detail about your profession and writing articles on biographies of actors and actresses.

From: Mridul Sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mriduls.sharma (talkcontribs) 14:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Editing here is not my profession. I am a volunteer here like everyone else. Please read this article for more information. -- KRIMUK90  15:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Krimuk90. You have new messages at Talk:Arjun Kapoor.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Tamravidhir (talk) 13:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Akshay Kumar filmography[edit]

I have improved the above filmography. There were no comments at the PR. Can you take a look at it and tell me whether it should be renominated or not? Thanks for your help.--Skr15081997 (talk) 05:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll try, but no promises. -- KRIMUK90  07:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Sonakshi Sinha's Wikipedia article and Sonam Kapoor's article[edit]

Respected Krimuk Sir,

The article of Sonakshi Sinha which is made on Wikipedia has been edited by some random Ip addresses which led to the deletion of her picture and adding of her height which is not according WP source and a slightly similar thing was happened to Sonam Kapoor's article .Adding of height not according to WP source. Please check and correct all the above inaccurate data. Please reply me back.

From: Mridul Sharma — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mriduls.sharma (talkcontribs) 12:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

I'll take a look. But please stop ruining my talk page alignment. -- KRIMUK90  07:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Reality check[edit]

Kangana ranaut was main heroine of Krrish 3 and was nominated for Best Supporting Actress. Priyanka starred briefly? Kashibai is supporting act. I see your all edits against Chopra. So, you were the one who re-added that catfight. I don't see that on Mukerji, Padukone and other article of yours. You were taking advantage of my silence and it all over now. Much favouritism huh? Sorry but, I wasted my time interacting with you. I don't want to interface in your work. So, pls dont interface with mine.—Prashant 14:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Kangana, main heroine in Krrish 3? That's like calling John Abraham the main hero of Dhoom! In fact, I feel Kangana was predominantly evil in Krrish 3 until the character's last few minutes. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Well that's what is according to Krimuk. She was main lead and Priyanka was a supporting act.You can see what Krimuk had added to Kangna's and Chopra's page. He made Kangna as a lead and Chopra as a brief role.—Prashant 15:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)o

LOL, the rant begins again! So apparently I am partial to every other Bollywood actress other than Priyanka Chopra, which is ridiculous! -- KRIMUK90  01:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

No. no its not like that. I only said what I felt. You said Kangana as main lead and I said ok. Then, you does the same for Chopra and calls her supporting, though I know she is a supporting actress. But, the film is not even released. As per your thoughts like it became clear after K3 release. I mean we can simply say she is starring alongside this and this. I see your these kind of edits only for Chopra. Also, you have reverted all my edits since I don't know.

I don't revert anybody's edits unless there is some mistake. So, I don't target either you or Ms Chopra. I have always been willing to co-operate with you, but only if you stop comparing Chopra to every other actress. That's unwarranted, and unfair to both Chopra and the other heroines. She is as successful as Kareena, Kangana, Vidya, Rani, Deepika, Katrina etc, so there is no reason for me to portray someone as more or less successful, because they all have done very well in their careers. -- KRIMUK90  09:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

But, all my edits are not that bad, though I know I don't write that we'll. But, now I understand that I don't have anything to do with the article. Right? I never interrupt your edits as they are brilliant off course. I don't compare her, but your edits. As, Kailash said Calling Kangna the lead is like calling John, the lead actor of Dhoom. But, you should give some space for others too.—Prashant 12:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Fyi, nowhere in Kangana's article does it say that she played the lead role in Krrish 3. It's quite obvious she was the villain in the film. Kailash's response was to your comment, and not mine. -- KRIMUK90  14:13, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

I mean Chopra starred briefly and Ranaut starred in Krrish 3, both are different things. Doesn't matter who played prominent roles. For example Kapoor in 3 Idiots, Singhams Returns. But, no one dared to correct or object that. Even you didn't corrected. So, what will I assume from this. Now, you tell me?—Prashant 14:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Oh, please stop with the comparisons. There are several, several examples. Sonam played a brief role in Bhaag Milkha Bhaag, Katrina played a brief role in Dhoom 3. Similarly, Chopra played a brief role in Krrish 3. Again, no reason to compare Chopra with Kareena Kapoor. Kapoor belongs to a different league, and her article is in great shape, and written by a brilliant editor. Also, her role in 3 Idiots was not brief; the length was much more than Priyanka's role in Kaminey. In Singham Returns, yes, and the article very well covers that. So, please stop complaining before checking the facts and frustrating all your fellow editors! No one here is against Priyanka Chopra or you. So grow up and accept that fact! -- KRIMUK90  15:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hey, buddy![edit]

I'm good. Hbu? OMG, yes! I watched it last week too. Best movie I've seen in a long time. I think I'm in love with Rosamund Pike. She's beyond amazing in the movie! AB01 I'M A POTATO 10:19, 24 October 2014 (UTC)