User talk:LT910001

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please ping me ({{u}}) if you'd like me to contribute in a discussion on an article talk page.


I am ready to return to the community, which I will do after a Wikibreak. Thank you to all the users that expressed their support, it made all the difference. I am sorry for breaking the trust of these users and the community by leaving so abruptly. At the time I left, I was feeling powerless, that my efforts and person were not respected, and alienated. I felt like there was nothing I could do and that the conflict was quickly escalating to multiple venues and involving multiple users and could quickly deteriorate into an overall judgement on me as an editor. I must also admit this is the first real “conflict” that I’ve gotten into online, and I am more familiar with those in real-life, which in my opinion are somewhat more predictable, manageable, and containable.

I still feel strongly about WP, particularly about improving the medical and anatomy WikiProjects, to simply resign. I think that WP’s environment can be made more welcoming and inviting and I hope to initiate and participate in conversations about this, particularly on WikiProject Medicine.

I’ve also considered some of the personal causes that led up to this conflict. I will add some details to my user page and change my signature so that editors can feel they are working with a person. I will be more “thick-skinned”. I will be more open in my editing so that other users are aware of my activities and editing style, and so I do not feel that I am editing alone in the wilderness. I will be more assertive in asking for help. I have also had the chance to read some of WP’s policies and guidelines in more depth, so that I more understand what options I have should a situation arise in the future.

Again, I am very grateful to the users who expressed their support and confidence in me, and apologise again for leaving so abruptly. If I want things to change for the better I need to be part of the change. --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Nice to see you back. And I don't think you need to apologize for anything in this case. I've been meaning to re-email you, and will get around to that eventually. Flyer22 (talk) 05:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Wonderful having you back :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Great to have you back! --WS (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Welcome back, Tom! Iztwoz (talk) 11:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Glad to have you back my friend. You are definitely not alone in your editing endeavors and aspirations. I hope you're refreshed after your break because there's much to do so roll up your sleeves! TylerDurden8823 (talk) 07:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pudendal nerve[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pudendal nerve you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seppi333 -- Seppi333 (talk) 01:40, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


Thanks, I needed that. Always nice to be reminded that I'm not disliked by everyone! :) As to me taking a short break that will be a bit difficult since I recently got a bad case of the flue and all. Anyhow, looking forward for you're review; it still surprises me that nobody has reviewed it yet (I thought it was one of those articles which would spark interest). Thanks and cheers, --TIAYN (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering to review[edit]

Thank you for volunteering to review Gerontological nursing. I am a new editor and appreciate any help and feedback. LynnMcCleary (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)