User talk:Lafilledumonde

Welcome!

Hello, Lafilledumonde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I personally invite you to do so in my own sandbox (just follow the simple rules!). Again, welcome! — ßottesiηi ^{Tell me what's up} 19:44, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ross Sebastian

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ross Sebastian may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. porges 04:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hi...regarding the welcome notice that was left for you on April 23, I just wanted to clarify that you should only sign comments on internal Wikipedia pages, such as talk pages or AFD votes, with ~~~~. You shouldn't sign actual articles. Thanks. Bearcat 01:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The O.C.

Your recent edit to The O.C. was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 08:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Incrediblytrue2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Incrediblytrue2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paella.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paella.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secret ^account 22:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PS2.JPG

The file File:PS2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

file with unclear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]