User talk:Launchballer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Launchballer.

Blocked[edit]

You may not have broken 3RR, but you were certainly edit warring, and you've been blocked for that before, so you're blocked for a week. You should know better, you've been here a long time. Follow WP:BRD next time. Sergecross73 msg me 23:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

That's ridiculous - I was merely trying to ensure that WP:BRD was being followed! A block may have been warranted but a week is way too harsh. I'm busy today, but considering unblock requests.--Launchballer 07:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
The fact that you reverted 3 times shows that you weren't even close to following WP:BRD yourself, so that excuse isn't going to fly. The length of the block was escalated because your block log shoes you've been blocked for edit warring in the past. Sergecross73 msg me 10:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I got annoyed because the editor thought that a consensus, formed seven years ago and regarding a different state of the article altogether, still stood, and he wasn't listening. I also thought my edits fell under WP:3RRNO#EX4.--Launchballer 13:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
No, it was clearly a content dispute, not vandalism. And edit warring is not okay, even if you think your edits are justifiable. There was nothing so pressing about this (such as copyvios or WP:BLP violations, that this couldn't have been resolved on the albums talk page, or at a Wikiproject or something. Sergecross73 msg me 14:46, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Re-adding this. You can clear your talk page, but you are not allowed to remove active block notices. Sorry. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 00:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

@ Sergecross73. Blame me - Sorry, I didn't realise about not removing block notices. However I should add that there is material on this user's front page which shows that perhaps a little more kindness is warranted in this case - at the very least some advice on how to get help when an edit war might be about to begin. --Storye book (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

It's all right to remove the block notice as long as you're not requesting unblock, Launchballer (because if you're doing that it's needed). Sergecross73, I've just changed the guideline per overwhelming consensus on talk.[1] [2]. Bishonen | talk 09:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC).

That wasn't even enacted until after I had done it. But thanks for the heads up for the future, good to know. Sergecross73 msg me 12:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Noted. Upon my unblock I will be copying these comments over to the archive and requesting that the revisions made before this be moved to the archive. As for preventing future edit wars, I will be voluntarily following WP:1RR from now on. Any second reverts can be made by someone else.--Launchballer 17:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Launchballer/archive/2014/401-500[edit]

A tag has been placed on User talk:Launchballer/archive/2014/401-500, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Custom histmerge, could all revisions of User talk:Launchballer before this one be moved here please.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Launchballer 09:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: The above message (which I don't totally understand) was sent to my talkpage, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to to do about it. Launchballer asked me to archive his userpage while he was blocked, I was (and am) happy to help, so I did it. I didn't realise that the Blocked message should not have been archived, but as it was copied back onto Launchballer's talkpage by admin, I understood that all was well. Now could someone please tell me - am I supposed to just leave this thing alone to look after itself - or am I being asked to dispute the deletion tag on Launchballer's behalf? It's not my archive, and I have no personal interest in what happens to it, but if I'm being asked to support Launchballer's interests until the block is completed, will someone please let me know what exactly is required, and I'll do it. Thanks. --Storye book (talk) 09:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Storye book: With the rest of my archives, the history is in the archive therefore I'd like the history moved to there. I believe I set out my intentions in a comment above, and I need an administrator for this. With Twinkle, which I use extensively, it automatically sends out talk page messages for deletions for custom criteria and I should've unticked the box. My sincere apologies, no offense was intended.--Launchballer 09:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • No worries, I don't get offended. I'm glad all is well, and I'm here to help if needed. --Storye book (talk) 09:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Thea Austin[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plastik Funk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Everybody Dance Now and Shaggy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014[edit]

Hi[edit]

Could you please take a look at Josephine Bornebusch. Thanks!--BabbaQ (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

And Robban Andersson :) Thanks :)--BabbaQ (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Two attempts later... Reflinks is playing up, it says "Unable to establish gateway with remote VM". Discussion about it can be found here.--Launchballer 15:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Reflinks is back up, I just managed to do so on my own article Dr. Who (Tujamo and Plastik Funk song). However, I see Technical 13 beat me to it. Any other articles you want Reflinks run on I am now able to do again.--Launchballer 00:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You![edit]

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Man's Barnstar
For many helpful AfD nominations. RomanSpa (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I was beginning to think I was posting too many because I had to withdraw quite a few of them.--Launchballer 12:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
The trick is to learn to lose gracefully! Sometimes an AfD debate is a good way to focus people's minds, and if that leads to a better Wikipedia then no harm is done. Keep up the good work! RomanSpa (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Vandal[edit]

You undid my edit of the Now Summer 2008 (Australian series) article to stop a vandal - recent incarnation 121.217.197.176. I know nothing of this article, so I appreciate your insight. Be aware though, that this would be a rare "constructive" contribution, maybe the first, so please make certain it is constructive. Thanks.

Prosecreator (talk) 22:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Have another look at this edit and tell me if you think it is vandalism. Quite honestly, I would consider your edit to that article less constructive than the IP's; the IP simply piped a link to an article, whereas you made "(song)" visible, which is undesirable. Who cares if it's the first constructive contribution it made - the fact was, the edit was constructive, and the only time a user's edits should be blanket reverted is if the editor is indefinitely blocked or banned, which is not the case and in any case can be done by an admin using Special:Nuke. To echo my comment in the edit summary; comment on content not contributors.--Launchballer 23:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. Wikipedia's mechanisms to stop vandalism from anonymous IP's are simply inadequate. I am not an administrator, but am doing my best to repair the damage this individual or individuals cause. It requires a lot of effort to clean up these messes time and time again, and mistakes can be made. Numerous articles are effected by this individual, and they've been active for months, maybe years. Often they simply delete entire sections or add inappropriate content (e.g. childish bathroom humor). Sometimes it is more "insidious" with seemingly legitimate content that upon closer inspection is intentionally incorrect. Prosecreator (talk) 18:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Here is a link to another recent discussion about this character: User_talk:Discospinster#Musical_Key_Vandal Prosecreator (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ZSZ[edit]

A tag has been placed on ZSZ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Prosecreator (talk) 18:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Johanna Frändén[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 14:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of No Mediocre[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of No Mediocre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Dr. Who! (Tujamo and Plastik Funk song) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Django Reinhardt
added a link pointing to The Chase (game show)
Dr. Who! (Tujamo and Plastik Funk song)
added a link pointing to Chuckie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014[edit]