User talk:Lenov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello[edit]

Hello,

I'm one of the contributors to the Systems Biology article. I just wanted to thank you for your input and I hope that you will keep contributing to the Systems Biology article and talk pages.

Best Wishes and Happy New Year

Robnpov 22:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Recept3D.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Recept3D.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


Image copyright problem with Image:DennisBray.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:DennisBray.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:DennisBray.JPG[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:DennisBray.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Asenine  17:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC) -- Asenine  17:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:JPChangeux-small.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JPChangeux-small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Asenine  17:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC) -- Asenine  17:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


Image permission problem with Image:JPChangeux-small.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:JPChangeux-small.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

To the above, I wanted to add that we have a similar concern with Image:DennisBray.jpg. Particularly when images have been demonstrably published elsewhere prior to placement here, we need external verification that we have authorization to use them. This is necessary to protect the project from legal difficulties. With this second image, the matter can be easily cleared up by having a release placed here. Alternatively, the e-mail processes above can also work. The Wikimedia Foundation assigns these e-mails an OTRS number which is placed on the image's page so that if at any point in the future our right to use the image is legally challenged, we are able to present proof of compliance with US copyright law. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know. I have tagged the images {{OTRS pending}}, which alerts other administrators that you have sent the letter. When the OTRS ticket is logged, the images should be cleared. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:59, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. It often takes a few days for permissions letters to make it through the Communications Committee. Have you received any response to your e-mail? The images shouldn't be deleted while that permission letter is pending, but if they are, they should be easily restored once it is cleared. The only real problem I foresee would be if for some reason your permissions e-mail did not cover the necessary points to log the clearance, but even then it should be a simple matter to put them back on Wikipedia once the problems are straightened out. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

changeaux[edit]

your realise, of course, the word bibliography means list of books, or more specifically list of publications, right? further it is by overwhelming numbers the standard option for use as section headings. --emerson7 19:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:JPChangeux-small.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:JPChangeux-small.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. emerson7 19:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

File:JPChangeux-small.jpg again[edit]

Did you forward the email giving permission to use this file to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as you were previously asked to do? Please do so as a matter of urgency. The image will be deleted shortly if you do not do so. I've listed the image at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 January_8#File:JPChangeux-small.jpg. Many thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

By far the simplest method of getting a picture uploaded is to have someone take a picture and upload it themselves on Wikimedia Commons. It will be useable here just as if it had been uploaded here only without endless emails and with much less chance of confusion as to acceptable licenses. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Can you forward the email you got as explained at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission#When permission is confirmed and add {{OTRS pending}} to the image when you've done so? Many thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Picture of Jean-Pierre Changeux[edit]

Now that a message has been sent to OTRS, the matter should be straightened out soon. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Computational Biology[edit]

Hi Lenov. I saw that you recently changed the assessment for an article in the WikiProject Computational Biology. We have recently tried to revitalise this project by identifying and tagging articles of relevance. I'm not sure we've done a good job with systems biology articles so far. So if you were able to add tags to any of those you thought were relevant we'd be delighted :) There is a growing list of other tasks that you can help out with if you have a few free moments. See the discussion page. All the best. Alexbateman (talk) 08:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent assessments! Much appreciated. If you have time to help any more I used a tool to identify all the articles in the Systems Biology category (and one depth of subcategory) that currently are lacking the Computational Biology WikiProject:

http://toolserver.org/~magnus/catscan_rewrite.php?depth=1&categories=Systems_biology&comb[union]=1&templates_no=WikiProject+Computational+Biology&templates_use_talk_no=1&PHPSESSID=s3l4ihbac6c7oqc1rln30ven14&doit=1

Hmm, looks like the wikipedia rendering is screwing up the URL. Hope you can work it out Alexbateman (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Importance of biographies in WikiProject Computational Biology[edit]

Hi User:Lenov,

I see that we have now assessed all the ~750 article in the WikiProject, Yay! I was having a look through the Top importance articles and noticed that you had added some biographies in that category. I have been adding all the biographies as low importance unless they were someone who perhaps was completely fundamental to the field and then only giving them a mid importance. It would be good for us to get some consistency in our approach. From my perspective the top importance articles are those that someone from outside the field might come across or be interested in such as Bioinformatics. These articles are also likely to get a lot of traffic. Here is some very short guidance I found:

Need The article is of priority or importance, regardless of its quality
Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low Subject is mainly of specialist interest.
Bottom (Optional) Subject has no real significance to the project.
NA (Optional) Subject is a disambiguation or redirect page, residing in article space.

What do you think? Alexbateman (talk) 10:04, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DennisBray.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DennisBray.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interactome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Neuroscience welcome[edit]

I just wanted to say welcome to WP:WikiProject Neuroscience. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, me too. Looie496 (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonard R Stephens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Signaling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Identifiers.org, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DOI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael J O Wakelam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Stuart J Edelstein[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Stuart J Edelstein, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Stuart J Edestein. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 08:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)