Feel free to leave me a message at any time and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Unless directed otherwise, I will always respond on this page. I have just started using STiki so if you could cut me some slack, I would really apprectiate that.Leoesb1032 (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Why did you remove my edit on Tirangaa. I am an Indian. This movie was released in 1992 and became a blockbuster. Unfortunately I couldn't find any link. But in your case you must watch this video  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZORDANLIGHTER (talk • contribs) 04:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
What i wanted to say was that I know that the movie is successful. Actually the time when this movie was released at that time there was no internet critics in India in the year 1992. critics appeared in newspaper and film magazines. There is no website copy of that. Indian news agencies are not that advanced like newyorktimes who have updated all old news. I have read in so many magazines that this movie was successfull.The link of boxofficeindia is dead this link might work http://ibosnetwork.com/asp/filmbodetails.asp?id=TirangaaZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Leoesb1032, I just wanted to let you know that I have granted the reviewer userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, please contact me and I will remove it for you at any time.
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Hello Leoesb1032. In the Steve Capus page I think that is just to emphasize in the idea that the allegation have not been proven yet. Everybody deserves be innocent if anybody can prove other thing.
Edit to place Washington Monument as tallest monument looks to be correct. However just because there is a statement on another Wikipedia page stating something it doesn't mean it is correct. Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference for itself. Robynthehode (talk) 22:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)