Nomination of 247Sports.com for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/247Sports.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 247Sports.com
A tag has been placed on 247Sports.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
2013 Pac-12 Standings
Hello, Oregon is not a Pac-12 North Division co-champion with Stanford. You are correct that they are indeed tied for first by their records, until you take into account the tiebreaker, which is Stanford's win over Oregon. Because of the conference rules related to the tie-breaker it is impossible for their to be division co-champions. I'd like to point out that I am a die hard Duck fan, but the page has to be accurate.
If you want further clarification, please feel free to review the Pac-12 website and you will see no mention of division co-champions, or Oregon's website, where they also have no mention of it.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 NCAA Division I FBS football season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | [[2014 Sugar Bowl|Sugar Bowl]]]]