User talk:Linguisticgeek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The writer is from the early 18th century. Therefore no reference exists on Google. Sasikumar10 (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Sasi

which writer ?.LinguisticGeek 14:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Theories of humor[edit]

Please don't revert User:Cdg1072's deletion on this article. He's removing his own addition to the article, which is supported only by his own unpublished paper. Several editors have been discussing the issue. Completely understandable why you reverted him (unexplained deletion I assume) since he's been using possibly as amny as 6 different IPs as well as his account, and he's not very good about using edit summaries or signing his comments. Meters (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

ok.did not know that.LinguisticGeek 06:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter[edit]

Hey Linguisticgeek. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:42, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siddharth Varadarajan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Tulu language article as good article[edit]

Let's make Tulu language article Good artilce. Please join discussion on Talk page of the article. Rajraowiki (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Benfold. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Hindu Nationalism because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Benfold (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Linguisticgeek. You have new messages at Benfold's talk page.
Message added 12:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Benfold (talk) 12:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Please, stop![edit]

Please, clarify which way they are same? Hindu Nationalism and Sangh Parivar both have different pages. If you don't clarify in my talk page and start reverting then i've to bring this to ANI. Thanks, --Benfold (talk) 12:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Template:Hindu Nationalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you![edit]

Choco-Nut Bake with Meringue Top cropped.jpg Hi, Sorry for the edit war on the template. I should have used the template's talk page. Anyways, I like cupcakes very much and hope you'll enjoy it too. Warm Regards, Benfold (talk) 04:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M. Govinda Pai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trousseau Week[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Trousseau Week has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local event; no general importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 03:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

About Yogendra Yadav[edit]

Hi, Please refrain from adding nickname to the BLP again and again after being disputed by many other editors. It will be much practical if you add the refs with it in the another section. Reverting every edit and adding the name in bold repeatedly is not appropriate. Harsh (talk) 10:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Also wondering why you've insisted upon a nickname used in one article. Most articles on living people only refer to individual's nom de plume if its usage in source materials justifies it. In this case, it seems to be superfluous, but perhaps you could defend your decision. —Foolsscholar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.149.196 (talk) 14:24, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

It is well sourced.your reasons are invalid. Linguisticgeek (talk)

Ah, so you're a communalist then! Excellent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foolsscholar (talkcontribs) 22:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

No.I am an Ambani agent.Linguisticgeek (talk)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2014 (UTC)