User talk:Lo2u

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Important - please read before you post

Please remember to sign your posts. This will result in your receiving a quicker and more useful reply because I'll know who you are and what you're referring to. You can sign by leaving four tildes (~~~~) after your comments. If you're posting in connection with a specific article, it would also be helpful if you would tell me which one. --Lo2u 10:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Bent bananas[edit]

Your edits to Commission_Regulation_(EC)_No_2257/94 are really good, it is much less partisan now. Thanks! 86.15.111.76 (talk) 22:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Bent bananas[edit]

Your edits to Commission_Regulation_(EC)_No_2257/94 are really good, it is much less partisan now. Thanks! 86.15.111.76 (talk) 22:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


That's no problem. There's a discussion about a possible move and rewrite of Euromyth at talk Talk:Euromyth if you have any comments. I think it's in everyone's interests, with one side complaining it will inevitably present Euro-Sceptics in a poor light without allowing room for opposing views, and the other regretting there can't be more discussion of what is seen as media distorted coverage, it might make everyone happy. Best whishes. --Lo2u (TC) 00:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Map[edit]

This map does not give any units or a reference of were the data comes from. Wondering if you have that info?

Homicide-world2.png

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Indeed, the description page was a real mess. My fault. That was the initial page when the image was uploaded, which I really thought I'd updated using the template in the other map. It was a while ago. Maybe I forgot or maybe I edited it and the edit didn't take. Anyway, the image is an illustration of the data in List of countries by intentional homicide rate, which is the only place it appears. The original sources are so numerous that I would rather not itemise them on a page that is not in the article space, unless you really think it's necessary. Anyway, hope it's ok now. If not, please tell me. --Lo2u (TC) 19:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demigod, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cato, Genii and Heroes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

"Unique"[edit]

Hello. Perhaps you missed my edit summary. In this context, "unique" means that the vessel is not part of a ship class. Please stop removing it. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 19:36, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

My apologies. I did indeed miss the edit summary and I wouldn't have reverted had I noticed it; I just saw the blank summary. I take the point, but I still don't like the way this reads. Can't it simply say that it is the only ship in its class? -Lo2u (TC) 19:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
No problem - my finger slipped and hit enter while I was typing the summary. One of the small problems with the new notification systems, I suppose. In any event, if you want to reword it, that's fine. Parsecboy (talk) 21:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)