User talk:Locke Cole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Interaction ban request[edit]

I've filed for an interaction block between us at ANI. It's evident no good comes when we attempt to discuss things. I'm sure you can agree. Rusted AutoParts 01:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Side note, the edit summary says I undid your edit. This obviously isn't the case. Rusted AutoParts 01:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
That wouldn't work. —Locke Coletc 19:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

You really need to read WP:PERSONAL. Rusted AutoParts 19:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

You made it personal when you started attacking me for no reason other than me stating my opinion. You really need to learn to play the victim better. —Locke Coletc 20:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Seriously? I merely disagreed with your opinion and you took it to heart. A majority of your replies consist of needlessly pointy jabs that have no business in the discussion. Rusted AutoParts 20:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
I said this, and (apparently this is just you disagreeing with my opinion, I disagree with that assessment) you said this in response. If you don't see the problem with your behavior there, I can't help you. If you can't understand how it got personal after that, I also can't help you. Ask somebody else, I'm done with you. —Locke Coletc 22:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Can we at least agree to both act a bit more mature? We may not agree, but making it personal (on both of us) isn't benefitting the debate and most definitely annoying our fellow editors. Rusted AutoParts 20:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Assume good faith only gets you so far, and when you repetitively make it personal you can't expect me to suddenly back off because you're now uncomfortable with the bed you've made for yourself. WP:AGF got me to step back the first few encounters I had with you and reassess, no more. —Locke Coletc 22:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Im sorry you feel that way.ive always felt the best thing to do when things like this get heated is wipe the slate clean and be more calmer. I'm a bit of a hypocrite, I concede, but it still doesn't deter me from wanting to make any attempt at all to leave a discussion on some good terms. And even if it doesn't look like it, I do respect your opinion. I believe in when verifiable sources post something, its a good source. But I've always felt differently in terms of biographies. This is someone's life history. Something we should always make sure is correct in all areas. I'm not doubting she is pregnant, and I'll kindly eat my own words should I get proven wrong. You already know my side, so I won't rehash it. I can only offer you a hypothetical hand to shake, and part ways. Rusted AutoParts 22:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Scarlett Johansson". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 3 April 2014.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 21:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected[edit]

The request for formal mediation concerning Scarlett Johansson, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Scarlett J[edit]

You know and I know and the entire non-Wikipedia publishing world knows she's pregnant, but it's just not that important -- you could just have easily been blocked per wp:3rr as having the page protected. Will you tell Spartaz you'll cease trying to insert the tag so we can get the page back to normal? NE Ent 23:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:S-VHS.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:S-VHS.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)