User talk:Locke Cole
There is no reason to blank an article that you tag with WP:CSD#G1. Nor, in my view, was the article nonsense. I still deleted it because it was petty vandalism, but please tag pages properly and, off the top of my head, you would blank an article if it were an attack page or a copyright violation, and I believe there is a template that should be placed on the page in those cases.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I think I grew concerned when the article was already showing up in search results on Google, hence the blanking. As to nonsense vs. vandalism, it didn't make sense to me, I'm glad it made sense to you. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 05:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Locke, it was surprising and nice to see your note on my talkpage. After our unpleasant experience being on opposite sides of a bitter dispute in 2009, perhaps time might have given both of us the ability to heal.
I wish you well, and encourage you to come back to editing when you feel the time is right.
My best wishes.
- They say time heals all wounds, and I think five years is more than enough time to set aside and move past something that has long since been settled. Thank you, Tony. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Waverly in Spokane County.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waverly in Spokane County.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:24, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Blu-ray 3D (logo).svg
Thanks for uploading File:Blu-ray 3D (logo).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).