User talk:Lord Opeth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Lord Opeth
User talk:Lord Opeth
User:Lord Opeth/Barnstars
User:Lord Opeth/Sandbox
Special:Contributions/Lord Opeth
User
Talk
Barnstars
Sandbox
Contributions

Welcome to my Talk page, where you can send me messages and comments.


Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4


Sailor Uranus and Neptune article issues[edit]

The image itself cannot be used as a source because it comes from an unreliable site, so it should be removed. Besides, a photo is redundant, as a simple citation to Materials Collection is more than enough. But are these two powers (air and water manipulation) mentioned in MC as factual abilities or as initial concepts of Takeuchi's which where finally not incorporated into the characters? If we could find a complete collection of photos from MC, just for verification reasons, we could see if they are fact (except if you own MC and have checked yourself that they are indeed in their list of powers or if another person you trust has seen it themselves and passed you the info). Also, the infobox colour in Uranus' article is purple-like, it should be changed because it is not her uniform colour. Thank you. Hula Hup (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I think there's this complete collection of the MC, but it is in Japanese: http://mangastyle.net/sailormoon-materials-collection/
Maybe Uranus' powers are not made from wind, but clearly Neptune's are. We can change Uranus' infobox to "Generation of damaging energy" but keep the "Generation and manipulation of water" in Neptune's. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 03:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
I see. If you don't own the art book or haven't been given the info by a trusted individual, I suggest we remove the info because it's speculation; personally I believe there's a greater chance of it being energy, but we can never be totally sure unless someone speaking Japanese translates the info for us. There is a place on Wikipedia where we can ask for translation, but I don't remember its name. Hula Hup (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Franchise articles to Disney films[edit]

Hey :) I saw your amazing work in the The Lion King (franchise) so thought I'd share with you a proposition that crossed my mind today. I saw how many Dreamworks films had franchise articles. Even those with only 1 film in them at the moment. I think Wikipedia should have franchise articles for Disney films. Lord knows pretty much every film has spawned sequels, video games, musicals, theme park rides, TV shows, and more. It should be fairly easy to collect the info and create the articles. You appear to be much more experienced that me, so I wanted to get your opinion on this. We already have The Lion King (franchise) and The Little Mermaid (franchise), so I would suggest starting off with Aladdin (franchise) and Beauty and the Beast (franchise) - those being 4 of Disney most popular/most successful films.

Thoughts?--Coin945 (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. The thing is that I am not as active in Wikipedia as I used to be, but I would contribute to the articles as much as I can. Go ahead and start them, using TLK and TLM franchises as basis. --LoЯd ۞pεth 01:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hmm.. I guess I could start off the articles.. but I can't promise they'd be any good. The point of a stub is to allow others to edit it and make it better, no? At least if I follow your guidelines in TLK i should be okay. It's a matter of copying info from the various other wiki-articles and compounding them into the one article.--Coin945 (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:HerculesDisney.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HerculesDisney.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HerculesDisney.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HerculesDisney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HornedKing.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HornedKing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Sailor Moon#GA?[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sailor Moon#GA?. Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC) The discussion for the sailor senshi images is at WT:ANIME]. Lucia Black (talk) 00:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DisneyVillains.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DisneyVillains.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DisneyVillains.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:DisneyVillains.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:VillainsFigures.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:VillainsFigures.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

FL for List of Sailor Moon characters?[edit]

Hi, Lord Opeth. I'm thinking about taking List of Sailor Moon characters to FL status, as with List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters and List of Naruto characters. I'm thinking about expanding the lead to include reception and information as well. Also I may do a complete rewrite of the article from scratch if its possible and I have also contacted WT:ANIME about this. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

I think it is a good idea. Right now, the article is well referenced, includes real world and impact information. Perhaps we should start by re-writing each character's section so that they are not presented in an in-universe way so that they can meet the WP:WAF criteria. The lead/intro should include more real world stuff and perhaps we should remove some in-universe info. I think that using a WP:Sandbox would be helpful. --LoЯd ۞pεth 01:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. I'll probably write up a draft at User:Sjones23/List of Sailor Moon characters in the next couple of weeks or so. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OnceUponMaleficent.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OnceUponMaleficent.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:LightningMcQueen.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:LightningMcQueen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MulanCharacters.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MulanCharacters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)